Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015435
Original file (20130015435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  15 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015435 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 25 (Education and Training Completed) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he received training as a cryptographic specialist.

2.  The applicant states he was trained as a cryptographic specialist and he maintained a top secret clearance with the Army Security Agency.  He would like his DD Form 214 corrected to show his grandchildren the truth.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* DA Form 873 (Certificate of Clearance and/or Security Determination Under EO 10450)
* DA Form 2545 (Cryptographic Access Authorization, Briefing Certificates)
* a memorandum
* Special Orders Number 103
* Special Orders Number 106
* Special Orders Number 41

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 October 1966.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 72B (Communications Center Specialist).  On 29 May 1967, he was granted a Top Secret security clearance.

3.  On 19 September 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his military service obligation.  The DD Form 214 he received shows he competed Army Training Program 21-114 (basic combat training), training as a Communications Center Specialist, and that he received training in the Code of Conduct.  The form fails to show he received formal training as a cryptographic specialist.

4.  The applicant provides copies of orders from Fort Gordon, GA, to Vint Hill Farms, Warrenton, VA, and a DA Form 2545 showing he received a cryptographic security briefing at Warrenton, VA, on 14 June 1967.  These documents also show his personnel file was flagged because he could be restricted from some assignments due to having access to Special Intelligence.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's release from active duty stated that item 25 would include an entry listing service schools, including major courses which were successfully completed, and military sponsored courses completed in civilian schools and colleges during the period covered by the DD Form 214.  For enlisted personnel, the installation training courses (qualification courses), military correspondence courses, and off-duty courses the enlisted person completed successfully during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of item 25 of his DD Form 214 to show he received training as a cryptographic specialist has been carefully examined.
2.  Though it is probable that a Communications Center Specialist may have received such training, the applicant's record does not contain any evidence and he did not provide sufficient evidence which shows he successfully completed formal training as a cryptographic specialist at any time during the period covered by his DD Form 214.  

3.  The fact that he possessed a Top Secret security clearance is duly noted, but there is no provision for annotating that information on his DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ___x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015435





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015435



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006736

    Original file (20140006736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 8 November 1991 to show: * his primary specialty as 11B2P * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * his duty military occupational specialty (MOS) as 95D (U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Special Agent) * he completed weapons expert training * he attended CID Special Agent School * he attended the ESI Advanced Security Specialist Program in a temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012621

    Original file (20110012621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. award of the Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; b. that his unit of assignments in Vietnam be reflected on his DD Form 214; and c. his DA Form 2545 (Cryptographic Access Authorization, Briefing Certificates) be corrected to show he held a higher security clearance than "Confidential." His DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 May 1971 was prepared while he was serving in Vietnam,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000113

    Original file (20150000113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Bronze Star Medal (BSM), a secret security clearance, and all Republic of Vietnam (RVN) service medals. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 16 October 1969 to 9 July 1971 and correct his final DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010544

    Original file (20080010544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In his unsigned self-authored statement, dated 5 June 2008, the applicant states that: a. he enlisted under the ACASP program, formerly known as the stripes for skills program, which qualifies non-prior service-members with critical Army needed skills to be granted an accelerated promotion, when they enlist for a certain MOS, meet all the requirements for that MOS, and can demonstrate proficiency to their training command. He was finally recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5 on 27 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012028

    Original file (20070012028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), which will simply be referred to as his DD Form 214 throughout the remainder of these proceedings, be corrected by: a. changing his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) title in item 16a from Special Identification Operator to Special Identification Techniques Analyst; b. removing the entry "203.138 Telegraph Operator" from 1tem 16b (Related Civilian Occupation and Dictionary of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012933

    Original file (20100012933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * he attended the school for military occupational specialty (MOS) 31S (Satellite Communications Systems Operator-Maintainer) and to show he received both tactical and strategic training because the course was later split into two courses * he completed school for additional skill identifier (ASI) 1C (Satellite Network Controller) * he completed basic combat training (BCT) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051908C070420

    Original file (2001051908C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His separation document indicates he had 3 years, 2 months and 27 days of creditable service. There is no evidence of record available to the Board, which shows that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action; therefore, he is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003825

    Original file (20080003825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal Unit Citation. Item 21 of this form shows the request was submitted because the applicant's duty assignment required him to handle classified information up to and including Top Secret. There is no evidence in the applicant's personnel records which shows that he is entitled to receipt of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106211C070208

    Original file (04106211C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that the top secret security clearance was a requirement to complete his MOS training. In spite of the denial of his request for an exception to the 24 month training requirement, the applicant pursued and was successful in securing a training seat in the pilot course, completed the course on 12 December 2003, and was awarded the 96B specialty. Although the applicant initially intended to pursue training in a field which did not require a security clearance, he was subsequently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002546

    Original file (20080002546.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She goes on to state that she completed all of her training and demonstrated the appropriate level of proficiency; however, her commander denied her promotion because her Top Secret clearance had not been completed. However, after completing her training, she was assigned to a unit requiring her to have a Top Secret security clearance and because the adjudication of her clearance was delayed, she was denied advancement to the pay grade of E-5 until 13 February 2007, over 3 years after she...