Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000113
Original file (20150000113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	 

		BOARD DATE:	  27 August 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000113 

THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Bronze Star Medal (BSM), a secret security clearance, and all Republic of Vietnam (RVN) service medals. 

2.  The applicant states he received an early discharge upon his return from Vietnam and was separated from service on temporary records and his affidavit. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* ARCOM Certificate
* ARCOM Citation
* General Orders Number 16156 awarding him the ARCOM
* BSM Certificate
* BSM Citation
* Letter from the Office of the Adjutant General informing him he had been awarded the BSM
* General Orders Number 06982 awarding him the BSM
* DA Form 2545 (Cryptographic Access Authorization, Briefing Certificates)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 16 October 1969, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  After initial training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 05C (Radio Teletype Operator).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* Item 31 (Foreign Service) – he served in the RVN from 11 July 1970 to 
his separation date
* Item 38 (Record of Assignments) - he was assigned to the 23rd Administration Replacement Detachment and Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 11th Infantry Brigade during his RVN service
* Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) –

o National Defense Service Medal (NDSM)
o Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
o ARCOM
o RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
o Overseas Service Bar
o Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
o Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)

4.  On 9 July 1971, he was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-4 and transferred to the U.S Army Reserve.  

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 from the period ending 9 July 1971 shows he received the NDSM.

6.  General Orders (GO) Number 16156, issued by Headquarters, 23th Infantry Division, dated 17 December 1970, announced the award for the ARCOM to the applicant for meritorious achievement during the period 1 August 1970 to 
30 November 1970.  

7.  General Orders (GO) Number 06982, issued by Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division, dated 22 June 1971, announced award of the BSM to the applicant for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force while assigned to HHC, 11th Infantry Brigade, 23rd Infantry Division from 1 July 1970 to 31 May 1971.  

8.  The applicant submitted a copy of DA Form 2545 showing he had been the subject of a favorable National Agency Check (NAC) and had been found clearable for classified information up to and including secret, dated 
10 August 1970.

9.  A review of the applicant's service record reveals that he participated in the following three Vietnam campaigns:

* DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive, 1 May 1970 – 30 June 1971
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VII, 1 July 1970 – 30 June 1971
* Consolidation I, 1 July 1971 – 30 June 1971

10.  DAGO Number 6, dated 1974, announced the award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to HHC, 11th Infantry Brigade for the period 
1 April 1971 to 30 June 1971.

11.  His record is void of documentation showing he was the subject of disciplinary action during his active duty service.  He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.

13.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings.  

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the VSM for participation in each credited campaign.  

15.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by the units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the HHC, 11th Infantry Brigade was cited for award of RVN the Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, (DAGO) 6, dated 1974.

16.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  The regulation does not provide for entering a servicemember’s security clearance on the 
DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  GO awarded the applicant the BSM and the ARCOM.  

2.  GO 6, dated 1974 shows the applicant’s unit was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  

3.  He received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service, he was promoted to E-4, and there is no record of any disciplinary action taken against him.  Based on his overall record of service, it appears that an administrative error occurred resulting in him not being recommended for or awarded the first award of the AGCM.  Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 16 October 1969 to 
9 July 1971 and correct his final DD Form 214 to show this award.

4.  He was awarded the VSM and participated in three campaigns.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three bronze service stars. 

5.  The applicant completed a qualifying period of service in Vietnam for award of the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award and issuance of the medal.

6.  Pursuant to Army Regulation 635-5, there is no requirement to list a servicemember’s security clearance on their DD Form 214.  



BOARD VOTE:

_________  ________  _______  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  __X______  __X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the:

* VSM with three bronze service stars
* RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* BSM
* AGCM
* ARCOM
* RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to listing his security clearance on his DD Form 214.    
   


      
      __________X________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140013405



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000113



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009905

    Original file (20100009905.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009905 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army’s awards policy. Therefore, based on the recommendation of his unit commander contained in the DA Form 137 in his record, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 23 October 1968 through 22 October 1971 and to add it to his record and DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001889

    Original file (20120001889.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (1st Award), an upgrade of at least one Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) to the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add all authorized awards 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008336

    Original file (20110008336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, his DD Form 214 does not show all the awards he received and his awards were never issued to him. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 29...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011397

    Original file (20110011397.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: a. item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with oak leaf cluster (OLC) * Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM) * Legion of Merit (LOM) * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020200

    Original file (20100020200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his record be corrected by adding a third award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and all unit awards due based on his service and campaign participation in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * self-authored statement * ARCOM Certificate, dated 12 February 1971 * ARCOM Citation * ARCOM Orders, dated 24 February 1971 * enlisted disability retirement letter orders, dated 3 August 1971 * DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000619

    Original file (20080000619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 12 January 1970 through 6 December 1970. The applicant provides a PH Certificate which shows that on 20 July 1970, the 91st Evacuation Hospital awarded him the PH for wounds he received in action on 19 July 1970. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add his award of the PH to his record and separation document at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017135

    Original file (20090017135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd Award), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Item 38 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 also shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments, and his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018773

    Original file (20140018773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 885, issued by Headquarters, II Field Force Vietnam Artillery, dated 29 July 1970 awarded him the BSM for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force for the period from August 1969 to July 1970. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * BSM * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * MUC * VSM with four bronze service stars * RVN Civil Actions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003454

    Original file (20120003454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 July 1971. General orders awarded him the DFC (2nd Award) and he is entitled to addition of this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 29 March 1968 through 27 July 1969, b. deleting award of the DFC and VSM from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 July 1971,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014018

    Original file (20130014018.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records contain a copy of a letter, dated 21 April 1970, from Company E, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry, 11th Infantry Brigade, Americal Division that shows the commanding officer forwarded a BSM certificate to the applicant showing he was cited for award of the BSM during the period March 1969 to March 1970. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 17 April 1968...