Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015050
Original file (20130015050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130015050 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a reconsideration of her application to characterize her service as honorable versus "uncharacterized" and to show her rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states she disagrees with denial of that portion of her earlier request.  She provides an outline of her service to outline her periods of service and promotions.  She states she had more than 180 days of service to warrant the correction.

3.  The applicant provides copies of 14 Leave and Earnings Statements (LES), the 9 May 2013 Record of Proceedings with attachments, and a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120019438, on 9 May 2013.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), for eight years, on 20 July 1995, with entry onto initial active duty for training (IADT) on 2 October 1995. 

3.  On 22 November 1995, she was released from active duty due to pregnancy, was credited with completion of basic training, and issued a certificate of service. 

4.  On 22 August 1997, she was ordered to active duty to complete her IADT/AIT.

5.  The applicant was promoted to specialist (E-4) effective 15 September 1997.

6.  The applicant completed IADT/AIT and was released from active duty on 9 October 1997.  She was transferred to a USAR Troop Program Unit (TPU) in Salem, VA to complete her USAR obligation.

7.  The 9 October 1997 DD Form 214 shows 1 month and 18 days of active duty, during this period, with 1 month and 29 days of prior active duty and 1 year, 11 months, and 3 days of prior inactive duty.  Her service was shown as "uncharacterized."  

8.  The applicant served in a TPU until her voluntary request for transfer to the Inactive Reserve on 11 May 1999. 

9.  The LES's provided confirm the applicant's periods of active duty and active Reserve TPU service.

10.  A Certificate of Promotion shows she was promoted to sergeant (E-5) effective 25 January 1999.

11.  The applicant completed her period of obligated USAR service and received an Honorably Discharge Certificate on 22 July 2003. 

12.  On 9 May 2013, the ABCMR granted partial relief but denied a correction of her characterization of service and rank/grade (to E-5) . 

13.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 4 provides for the separation or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment and other periods of active duty or active duty for training.  It states specifically that individuals of the USAR ordered to active duty who have completed less than 180 days of continuous active duty were to have their service shown as "uncharacterized," even though they had completed IADT.  

14.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states:  
   a.  The DD Form 214 provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service (emphasis added) at the time of release, retirement, or discharge from active duty.  
   
   b.  USAR Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous ADT or IADT that results in the award of a military occupational specialty (MOS), even when the active duty period was less than 90 days, will be issued a DD Form 214.  
   
   c.  For item 4a and 4b, enter active duty grade of rank and pay grade at time of separation.
   
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The 9 October 1997 DD Form 214 covered the applicant's period of active duty service that ended on that date.  Her promotion to sergeant occurred 14 months after that date.  Therefore, further correction of her rank/grade is not warranted. 

2.  A DD Form 214 is issued to reflect periods of active duty.  While the applicant had over a year of inactive service prior to her release from her second period of IADT, at no point did she have the required 180 days of continuous active duty to warrant any entry on the DD Form 214 other than "uncharacterized."  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 





are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20120019438, dated 9 May 2013.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015050



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130015050



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015381

    Original file (20130015381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she was given an honorable separation from active duty, versus an uncharacterized separation, and she was separated in the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. Only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019438

    Original file (20120019438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her service was characterized as honorable versus "uncharacterized." Specifically, individuals of the USAR ordered to active duty who have completed less than 180 days of continuous active duty will have their service uncharacterized, even though they have completed initial active duty for training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090927C070212

    Original file (2003090927C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) for the period 14 August 1989 to 16 December 1989 be corrected to show her character of service as honorable vice uncharacterized. The applicant provides: On 6 May 1994, the State of North Carolina issued the applicant an Order and Certificate of Name Change which ordered the change of her last name from Cxxxer to Pxxxxll.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018969

    Original file (20130018969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service be changed to honorable and issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The doctor requested the applicant's release from service and stated the applicant was unable to continue in service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for members of the USAR under the following circumstances: * after...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003360

    Original file (AR20130003360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in entry-level status was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with character of service described as uncharacterized. However, the characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation is normally honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011433

    Original file (20140011433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 12 May 1990, to show in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) - private first class (PFC) * Item 4b (Pay Grade) - E-3 * Items 12a-e (Record of Service) - Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) service credit * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbon Awarded or Authorized) - Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge * Item 14 (Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526

    Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service." Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized even though they...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008695

    Original file (AR20130008695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 13 November 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130008695 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Presiding Officer I certify that herein...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004558

    Original file (20130004558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was discharged due to a disability aggravated by military service. Her record contains MEB proceedings, dated 24 August 1995, which show the MEB considered her for recurrent knee pain, determined her knee pain was an EPTS condition not incurred while entitled to base pay, and was not permanently aggravated by military service. b. Paragraph 3-7b, a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011625

    Original file (20130011625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 shows her: * type for separation - release from active duty training * characterization of service - uncharacterized * narrative reason for separation - completion of required active service. c. Paragraph 3–9 (Uncharacterized Separations) states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if separation processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry-level status, except when: (1) characterization under other than honorable conditions is...