IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 April 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130014862
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
2. He states the Army Good Conduct Medal is authorized for 3 years of honorable service and he was discharged early as an overseas returnee.
3. He provides his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire. This case is being considered using the applicant's DD Form 214.
3. His DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 February 1954.
4. He was honorably released from active duty on 5 January 1957 as an overseas returnee in the rank of specialist three. He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 4 days of creditable active service with no lost time. His DD Form 214 only shows award of the National Defense Service Medal.
5. His conduct and efficiency ratings are not available and there is no available evidence which shows any derogatory information or a record of a commander's disqualification for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying. Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying. There must have been no convictions by a court-martial. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions that the Army Good Conduct Medal is authorized for 3 years of honorable service and he was discharged early as an overseas returnee are acknowledged.
2. However, the available evidence does not include his character and efficiency ratings or whether he received any disciplinary action (i.e., court-martial) during his active duty service.
3. In the absence of sufficient evidence, there is no basis for awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
______________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130014862
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130014862
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020273
The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and that they be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge from Active Duty). Accordingly, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 10 September 1962 to 30 August 1965 and it should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022734
The applicant requests a new DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and any other awards he may be authorized. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 2 January 1957...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025618
While the applicant's records are not available to confirm his eligibility for the Army Good Conduct Medal, the following facts establish a preponderance of evidence that he was, in fact, eligible for the Army Good Conduct Medal and that it appears it was not issued due to an administrative oversight: * he was advanced to SP3/E-4 in 1 year and 4 months * his commander rated his conduct and efficiency as "excellent" on his DA Form 137 * his commander recommended him for the Army Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016908
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no orders or any other evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for the AGCM. His military service qualifies him for award of the NDSM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007721
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 26 February 1964 through 8 February 1967 and adding this award to his DD Form 214. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087927C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show that he received the Good Conduct Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal and the National Defense Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008261
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the awards of the National Defense Service Medal and Army Good Conduct Medal because they were never listed on his separation document (DD Form 214). The evidence shows that the applicant met the eligibility criteria and is authorized the award of the National Defense Service Medal for his honorable active service for the period between 13 March 1964 to 7 March 1966, inclusive. The evidence shows that the applicant was awarded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016509C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 July 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050016509 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008045C070206
There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Good Conduct Medal. This form was prepared by the Commander, 763rd Medical Detachment, on 12 January 1968, and requested that the Commanding Officer, US Army Transfer Station, Fort Dix, New Jersey, issue the applicant the Good Conduct Medal upon his release from active duty. AR 672-5-1, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to Soldiers who...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007830
Service medals and awards are not issued by the ABCMR. His complete military records for his service from 1963 to 1966 are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6 March 1963 through 22 February 1966, and b. adding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) to his two DD Forms 214.