Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014412
Original file (20130014412.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130014412 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states:

* it was the FSM's job to turn in the divorce decree and he did not
* his retiree account statement shows she is his spouse, not former spouse and she cannot get the survivor benefits

3.  The applicant provides:

* divorce decree and property settlement
* Retiree account statement
* FSM's death certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior service in the Army National Guard, the FSM enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 June 1968.  He and the applicant married on 6 May 1970.

2.  The FSM's DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 4 May 1988, shows he enrolled in the SBP for spouse and dependent children coverage, full base amount.

3.  The FSM retired in the rank of sergeant on 31 May 1988.

4.  The FSM and the applicant divorced on 11 August 2008.  The Property Settlement states the FSM is to provide SBP coverage for the applicant.

5.  The FSM died on 29 June 2011.  His death certificate shows his marital status as divorced.

6.  The applicant provided a copy of the FSM's Retiree Account Statement, dated 2 December 2010, which shows he continued to pay SBP premiums (spouse coverage) after their divorce.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

8.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

9.  Public Law 98-94, enacted 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although there is no evidence to show the FSM requested his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the statutory 1-year time limit, it appears it was the FSM's intention to provide the SBP annuity to the applicant.

2.  The FSM continued to pay SBP premiums after their divorce and he never remarried.  It would therefore be equitable to correct his records to show he requested to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage in a timely manner.
BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the FSM made a written request to change his SBP coverage to former spouse on 1 September 2008 and the request was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner; and

	b.  paying the applicant the SBP annuity effective 30 June 2011, the day after the FSM's death.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014412



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130014412



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024111

    Original file (20110024111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 July 1977, the applicant and FSM completed a settlement agreement in the Superior Court for the County of Whitfield and State of Georgia which stipulated, in pertinent part, that the FSM currently made payments on an annuity contract (SBP) whereby a percentage of his monthly retirement pay from the United States Government would continue at his death unto the applicant and the minor children of the marriage. In view of the foregoing and given there is no current spouse beneficiary, it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011281

    Original file (20140011281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage) was not filed by her or the FSM within 1 year of their divorce. He and the applicant divorced on 24 April 2002. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a written request to change his SBP spouse coverage to former spouse coverage on 1 May 2002 and the request was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005777C070208

    Original file (20040005777C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005777 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004698

    Original file (20140004698.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage and that she be granted the benefits described in their divorce decree (Tri-Care for Life, Military Identification Card, and Post Exchange and Commissary Privileges). The divorce decree provided by the applicant with her application did not award the applicant SBP entitlements. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003265C070205

    Original file (20060003265C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states that they were legally separated on 7 November 1977 and the decision to conclude with a divorce was made in March 1980 prior to the FSM’s retirement. He should not have been paying SBP premiums from on or about 10 June 1980, when they divorced, until 24 September 1983, when former spouse coverage for retired members was established. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004691

    Original file (20080004691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP spouse coverage prior to his retirement, on 31 January 1993, with full base amount. The divorce decree indicates that the FSM agreed to execute the documents necessary to comply with the USFSPA as appropriate, in effect, to provide the SBP to his former spouse. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. to show the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010076

    Original file (20080010076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the FSM, while still married to the applicant, elected SBP spouse coverage at a reduced amount, prior to his retirement. After retirement, he and the applicant were divorced. Their divorce decree did not obligate the FSM to change SBP coverage from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage; nevertheless, he continued to pay SBP premiums after the divorce and until his death, a period of nearly 5 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005569

    Original file (20120005569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel argues that: * T____ was the beneficiary of the SBP when the FSM retired through the date of the divorce; she was never deleted as the SBP beneficiary * The FSM made contact with DFAS and OPM to change the SBP designation to former spouse coverage; OPM complied but DFAS did not * The FSM believed no additional documentation was needed and as such, continued to pay monthly premiums until he was paid up * The Board has previously granted relief, directly or indirectly, in multiple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003201

    Original file (20150003201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the FSM elected SBP at retirement and he also elected to continue SBP coverage for her during their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019539

    Original file (20140019539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 September 2013, by letter, DFAS responded to the applicant that a review of the FSM's retired pay account reflected the FSM did not elect former spouse SBP coverage and although the divorce decree stated she must deem the election, there is no evidence she did so. On 27 January 2014, by letter, DFAS explained that in order for the former spouse to be eligible for the SBP annuity, the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse or the...