Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004691
Original file (20080004691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004691 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, as the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that she be provided an annuity under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was suppose to file a Debt Election Form (sic), DD Form 2657 (Verification for Survivor Annuity), on 18 November 2004 and failed to do so; and, now there is no beneficiary information on the FSM’s computerized pay account.  She is unable to receive what is rightfully hers.  The divorce decree states that all insurance policies and beneficiaries remain the same unless agreed upon by both parties.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her Marriage Bond, a copy of the FSM’s Death Certificate, a copy of the FSM’s Retiree Account Statement (DFAS-CL 7220), and a copy of his divorce decree in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 January 1973.  The FSM was married on 27 November 1975.  He was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG/E-6) on 5 August 1981.  

2.  The FSM’s personnel records contain a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 12 November 1992.  Part V (SBP Election), of the DA Form 4240, shows that the FSM indicated that he was married and had dependent children.  He elected spouse only coverage with full base amount.  
3.  On that same day, the FSM completed a Supplemental SBP Election for Spouse/Former Spouse.  The form indicated that the FSM coverage must be based on full retired pay in order to make a Supplemental Spouse/Former Spouse Election.  He indicated none. 

4.  The FSM served until he was separated for the purpose of retirement on 31 January 1993.  He was placed on the Retired List effective 1 February 1993.  

5.  On 4 February 1993, DFAS sent a letter to the FSM informing him that in accordance with regulatory authority that coverage was established at maximum level because spousal concurrence was not received.  DFAS suggested that he contact the Retirement Service Officer at the nearest military installation for information on spousal concurrence and request for administrative change.

6.  The applicant provides a copy of her divorcee decree, which shows that she was divorced on 18 November 2002.  The divorce decree contains the words on page 3 "All insurance policies and beneficiaries currently in effect shall remain in effect unless agreed upon in advance, in writing, by both parties."  Page 4 contains the words "Both parties agree to execute the documents necessary to comply with Uniform Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA) as appropriate.  Said benefits exceed 20 or more years of service."

7.  The applicant provided a copy of the FSM’s Retiree Account Statement, with an effective date of 5 April 2007, which was prepared by DFAS, London, Kentucky.  It shows that the SBP coverage type was "spouse only" and that an SBP cost of $85.31 per month was deducted from the FSM’s pay.

8.  The FSM died on 14 December 2007.  The certificate of death indicates his martial status as divorced.

9.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name, and are irrevocable except as provided for by law.

10.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.  This law also decreed that state courts could treat military retired pay as community property in divorce cases if they so chose.  It established procedures by which a former spouse could receive all or a portion of that court settlement as a direct payment from the service finance center.

11.  Public Law 98-525, enacted 19 October 1984, provided that a former spouse could request a deemed election within one year of the court order requiring SBP to be established on the former spouse’s behalf, provided the member agreed to provide coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP spouse coverage prior to his retirement, on 31 January 1993, with full base amount.  The applicant and the former spouse married on 27 November 1975 and divorced on 18 November 2002.  The divorce decree indicates that the FSM agreed to execute the documents necessary to comply with the USFSPA as appropriate, in effect, to provide the SBP to his former spouse.  

2.  As part of the divorce settlement agreement, the applicant was required to elect SBP coverage for his former spouse; however, the applicant did not notify DFAS within one year of the divorce of his election for former spouse coverage, as required by the SBP statute.  The applicant also did not make a deemed election within the one year.  

3.  Based upon the SBP award in the settlement agreement, the FSM's desire to comply with it as evidenced by his continuing to pay SPB spousal premiums after the divorce apparently until his death, and there being no eligible spouse beneficiary, it would be equitable to change the applicant's SBP beneficiary to former spouse beneficiary. 

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected:

	a.  to show the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" beneficiary on 18 November 2002, the date of the FSM's divorce; and

	b.  that the FSM's request was received and processed by the
appropriate office in a timely manner.




       _   ___x____   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


























ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004691



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004691



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014731C070206

    Original file (20050014731C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She included in the divorce decree that she would like the SBP as part of her divorce settlement for herself and her two children. The applicant submitted a written request, dated 25 May 2005, for a deemed election to DFAS to change the SBP coverage from spouse and children to former spouse and children coverage. Considering the applicant submitted a deemed election for former spouse and children coverage in a timely manner and provided documentation as evidence of her timely deemed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011598

    Original file (20120011598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002952

    Original file (20130002952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the FSM’s record be corrected to show the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary for the FSM's SBP benefits. Counsel states at the time of their divorce the FSM and the applicant were unaware of the requirement set forth in the U.S. Code requiring a former spouse deemed election with respect to the FSM's SBP. On 14 August 2012, DFAS stated, in response to the above letter, that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for the SBP the former spouse had to be awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022434

    Original file (20120022434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a Certificate of Death showing the FSM died on 20 December 2009 and was married to her at the time. A DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay, letter dated 31 January 2013 addressed to the FSM's former spouse, stated that with regard to her recent correspondence to DFAS regarding the retired pay account of the FSM and SBP coverage, the following was provided: (1) Former spouse SBP coverage is not automatically granted based on being awarded in a divorce decree; a formal request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018666

    Original file (20080018666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record to show that the FSM ever submitted a former spouse SBP election, or that the applicant ever made a deemed election request within one year of their divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the former spouse concerned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022187

    Original file (20100022187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The letter stated DFAS records did not show a request from her or the FSM within a year of the divorce. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved. In the absence of documentary evidence showing the FSM made or attempted to make a timely election for former spouse SBP coverage or that a court with proper jurisdiction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022197

    Original file (20120022197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Military states she is not entitled to continue to receive his retirement after being married for 19 years and 11 months. As for the annuity and there being a record of Bxxxxn L. Hxxxy being married to the FSM, there is no record of the FSM and Bxxxxn L. Hxxxxy ever being married. On 19 June 1990, the FSM and applicant were divorced.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021639

    Original file (20140021639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020113

    Original file (20140020113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his survivor benefit plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" (FS) within 1 year of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant's applied to DFAS for an SBP annuity; however, on 22 February 2014, DFAS responded to her request denying an SBP annuity due to the FSM never making a valid request to change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018916

    Original file (20080018916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant [the former spouse] requests, in effect, that the deceased former service member's (FSM's) records be corrected to show that she was designated the former spouse, beneficiary of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. The...