Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013941
Original file (20130013941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013941 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within 12 months of his divorce.

2.  He states he has paid SBP premiums on behalf of his former spouse continuously since his retirement and their subsequent divorce as required by court order.  He was not aware of the requirement to elect former spouse coverage.  Once he became aware of the requirement, he submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), but the change was denied because it was made outside of the 1-year period following the divorce.

3.  He provides a DD Form 2656-1, a Final Judgment and Decree of Divorce with an attached Memorandum of Settlement, and a notarized statement signed by his current spouse.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 31 December 2004, the applicant retired from active duty as a member of the U.S. Army Reserve by reason of sufficient service for retirement.  Prior to his retirement, he completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) on 12 October 2004.

	a.  In Section VIII (Dependency Information), he listed K____ as his spouse and he listed a son.

	b.  In Section IX (SBP Election) he selected coverage for spouse and child based on full gross pay without supplemental SBP.

3.  During the processing of this case, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirmed that K____ is listed as the applicant's SBP beneficiary.

4.  He provided the following documents.  These documents are also filed in his DFAS records.

	a.  A Final Judgment and Decree of Divorce with an attached Memorandum of Settlement shows he and K____ were divorced on 3 October 2008.  The Memorandum of Settlement was made part of the Final Judgment and Decree of Divorce and shows he was to bear the expense of the SBP.

	b.  A DD Form 2656-1 bears his undated signature; an undated witness signature; and K____'s signature, dated 27 March 2013.  The form shows he requested a change of his SBP election to former spouse coverage.  He indicated he was currently married and the election was being made pursuant to a court-approved written agreement entered into voluntarily as part of his divorce.

5.  He provided a notarized statement signed by his current spouse, C____, in which she states:

* she concurs with the SBP election change to former spouse coverage requested by the applicant
* she understands she is now the lawful SBP beneficiary
* by signing the statement, she is waiving her property rights to the SBP
* she understands her decision is irrevocable
* she signed the statement of her own free will

6.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant agreed to bear the expense of the SBP as part of his settlement agreement with K____.  The settlement agreement was made a part of their final divorce decree.

2.  Although the applicant has since remarried, his current spouse has stated she concurs with his request and she waives her property rights to the SBP.

3.  The evidence shows the only barrier to the applicant naming his former spouse as his SBP beneficiary is the fact that he did not submit his election within 1 year of his divorce.  In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show his election for former spouse SBP coverage was received and processed in a timely manner.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his election for former spouse SBP coverage was processed and accepted on 4 October 2008.



      ____________X_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013941



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013941



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013941

    Original file (20130013941 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Once he became aware of the requirement, he submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), but the change was denied because it was made outside of the 1-year period following the divorce. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show his election for former spouse SBP coverage was received and processed in a timely manner.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013941 (2)

    Original file (20130013941 (2).txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Once he became aware of the requirement, he submitted a DD Form 2656-1 (SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), but the change was denied because it was made outside of the 1-year period following the divorce. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show his election for former spouse SBP coverage was received and processed in a timely manner.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021682

    Original file (20130021682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired service member (RSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U.S. Code,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001910

    Original file (20070001910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he remarried and added his present spouse as his SBP beneficiary in 2005, DFAS dropped the SBP election. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, filed 13 December 2002; a copy of their Marital Settlement Agreement, dated 9 October 2002; a copy of a letter the applicant wrote to DFAS, Subject: Correct My Mistake, dated 16 June 2006; a copy of a DD Form 2656-9, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and Reserve Component Survivor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007853

    Original file (20100007853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time, a member must have made the election within 90 days of receiving the Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 or else wait until he/she applied for retired pay and elected to participate in the standard SBP. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage pursuant to their divorce decree. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008265

    Original file (20090008265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that shows the FSM ever made the Former Spouse SBP election directed in the divorce decree, or that the applicant requested a deemed election be made within one year of their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses status as an SBP beneficiary upon divorce; however, the means by which the divorced (former) spouse may receive a survivorship annuity are: (1) if the service member...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013035

    Original file (20130013035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that shows within 1 year of the divorce decree the applicant or his former spouse requested his SBP election be changed from spouse to former spouse based on the settlement agreement. Counsel provides a notarized affidavit wherein the applicant's spouse Frances stated she consented to the designation of the applicant's former spouse Laurie as the "former spouse" beneficiary for his SBP, pursuant to the settlement agreement that was incorporated into the applicant's and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007441

    Original file (20140007441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the record of her former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show her as the former spouse beneficiary for the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits. The available records do not show the FSM made a voluntary election to change his SBP election from spouse and child to former spouse coverage within 1 year after their divorce or that the applicant requested a deemed election of former spouse coverage within that same period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001419

    Original file (20120001419.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce. His spouse did not authenticate this form as required by law when a member is married and elects children-only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he elected SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008440

    Original file (20080008440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant further submits a notarized statement, dated 24 April 2008, wherein his current spouse concurred with the correction of his records to provide SBP benefits to his former spouse. On 10 July 1991, the applicant elected to provide an SBP annuity to his former spouse, who was at the time, his current spouse. In 2006, the applicant elected SBP coverage participation for his "Spouse Only" for coverage for his current spouse; however, this election was of no effect because he had...