Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120023017
Original file (AR20120023017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:  	Mr.

      BOARD DATE:  	26 April 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20120023017
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.


      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests his general, under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable and that his reentry (RE) code be changed.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he takes pride in his work and was very proud to serve the people of the US.  His discharge was unfortunate and not voluntary.  His separation is listed as misconduct, but he feels his character is much better than that.
 
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:			10 December 2012
b. Discharge Received:			General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge:				15 July 2011
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code:		Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200,  								Chapter 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4
e. Unit of assignment:				5 IN Rifle Co, IBC FC, Fort Bliss, TX
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:		27 October 2010, 3 years 18 weeks
g. Current Enlistment Service:		8 months, 19 days
h. Total Service:				8 months, 19 days
i. Time Lost:					None
j. Previous Discharges:			None
k. Highest Grade Achieved:			NIF
l. Military Occupational Specialty:		11B10, Infantryman
m. GT Score:					NIF	
n. Education:					HS Grad
o. Overseas Service:				None
p. Combat Service:				None
q. Decorations/Awards:			NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
r. Administrative Separation Board: 		No
s. Performance Ratings:			No
t. Counseling Statements:			No
u. Prior Board Review:				No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 October 2010 for a period of 3 years and
18 weeks.  He was 19 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate.  He completed 8 months and 19 days of active duty service.  His record contains no evidence of acts of valor or significant achievements.



SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:

1.  The applicant’s service record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  

2.  The DD Form 214 indicates that on 15 July 2011, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  The DD Form 214 also shows a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JKK and a reentry (RE) code of 4.

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:

1.  A DD form 214 for the period of service under review dated 15 July 2011.

2.  There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the available record.  

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:

The applicant provided a DD Form 149, dated 4 December 2012.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

The applicant did not submit any evidence of post service activities.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY:

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

2.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.

3.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It identifies the SPD code of "JKK" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2), misconduct (drug abuse).

5.  The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that a Soldier assigned an SPD Code of "JKK" will be assigned an RE Code of 4.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s available military records and the issue submitted with the application, there are insufficient factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army.  The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the presumption of government regularity prevails in the discharge process.  

3.  The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, it appears that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant would have been protected throughout the separation process.  

4.  The applicant believes his service merits a higher characterization of service.  However, by regulation, a UOTHC discharge is normally appropriate for a member separated by reason of misconduct.  It appears the applicant’s generally good record of service was the basis for his receiving a general, under honorable conditions discharge instead of the normal under other than honorable conditions discharge. 

5.  The applicant requests a change in his RE code.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It identifies the SPD code of "JKK" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), for drug offenses.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  

6.  Further, the SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that a Soldier assigned an SPD Code of "JKK" will be assigned an RE Code of 4.  An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  

7.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it is his responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration because they are not available in the official record.

8.  Therefore, based on the available evidence and the presumption of government regularity, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief. 

SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing: 	Records Review	Date:  26 April 2013      Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  N/A????? 

Counsel: N/A?????

Witnesses/Observers: N/A????? 

Board Vote:
Character Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		No
Change Characterization to:	No Change
Change Reason to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:	N/A
Change RE Code to:		N/A
Grade Restoration to:		N/A
Other:					N/A



Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions


ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20120023017



Page 5 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003872

    Original file (AR20130003872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Soldiers being...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021525

    Original file (AR20120021525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 July 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of Assignment: 977th Military Police Company, 97th Military Police Battalion, United States Army Garrison, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 31 March 2008, 5 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 year, 3 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 4 year, 3 months, 10 days i. On 13 June...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021517

    Original file (AR20120021517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 30 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022053

    Original file (AR20120022053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 2 February 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of Assignment: C Troop, 1st Squadron, 4th Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 31 March 2009, 04 years and 16 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 02 year, 10 months, 02 days h. Total Service: 02 year, 10 months, 02 days i. On 4...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002525

    Original file (AR20130002525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: 1. The applicant received a negative counseling statement dated 16 February 2012, for being recommended for punishment under Article 15.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005228

    Original file (AR20130005228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates on 23 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive for illegal drugs (060530). The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007344

    Original file (AR20130007344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the above misconduct, the commander recommended a general, under other than honorable conditions, discharge. The separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, on an unspecified date. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006491

    Original file (AR20130006491.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 19 February 2013, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (abuse of illegal drugs), specifically for wrongfully using heroin and being absent from accountability formation. However, after examining the applicant’s record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000445

    Original file (AR20130000445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows that on 7 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for wrongfully using marijuana. On 8 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014341

    Original file (AR20130014341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 13 February 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, 14-12c(2) JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: FSC, 11th Eng Bn, Fort Benning, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 22 October 2008, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 3 months, 22 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 3 months, 6 days i. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge...