Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013591
Original file (20130013591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013591 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be granted a renegotiated 4-year Dental Officer Multi-Year Retention Bonus (DOMRB) for the period 20111001 – 20150930.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he submitted his request for a renegotiated DOMRB in October 2011.  Due to unnecessary delays in processing his application it was not processed to completion and on 4 March 2013 the opportunity to renegotiate contracts was rescinded.

3.  The applicant provides two pages explaining the timeline of events, his request for a waiver/exception to policy to renegotiate his contract, copies of emails, his extension of his mandatory release date (MRD), and his request for a renegotiated contract.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After serving 5 years, 7 months, and 12 days of active service as a dentist in the Navy, the applicant accepted a U.S. Army Reserve commission as a Dental Corps major on 13 July 1998.  He was ordered to active duty on 31 December 1998 and has remained on active duty.  He was promoted to the rank of Regular Army Colonel on 1 October 2008.

2.  The contract submitted by the applicant with his application requested a renegotiated 4-year contract effect 1 October 2011.  His application was dated 
31 October 2011.
3.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG) which opines that the applicant’s supplied and command approved 4-Year DOMRB contract at $50,000 per year effective 20111001 – 20150930 should be accepted for processing and that his request for a renegotiated contract for the period 20121001 – 20160930 be denied.  Officials also recommended that the applicant allow his current contract to continue to expiration and then execute a new 3-year contract that would yield him more money.

4.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he responded to the effect that he desired a renegotiated contract for the period 20121001 – 20160930.

5.  On 4 March 2013, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs announced that Army policy regarding the renegotiation of all Army Medical Department officer special pay contractual agreements was rescinded and all contracts pending would be returned without action.   

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While it is the officer’s responsibility to submit a contract within a timely manner, the approving authority has opined that his contract would have been approved had it been received.

2.  Although the applicant now requests a renegotiated contract beginning            1 October 2012, his actual application was submitted and his chain of command recommended approval of a contract beginning in 2011. 

3.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, his original request for a 4-year renegotiated DOMRB contract for the period 20111001 – 20150930 should be approved.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he timely applied for and was granted a renegotiated DOMRB contract for the period 20111001 – 20150930 and paying him accordingly.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting him a renegotiated DOMRB contract for the period 20121001 – 20160930.  




      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013591





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013591



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001149

    Original file (20130001149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was told he was able to renegotiate his DOMRB to the Tier-1 level, $50,000 a year for 4 years, but could not renegotiate the contract until he graduated from the orthodontic residency and arrived at his new duty station at Fort Hood. He was able to sign a new renegotiated DOMRB on 26 December 2012 with an effective date of 1 October 2012. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. changing the effective date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079614C070215

    Original file (2002079614C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he executed a Dental Officer Multi-year Retention Bonus (DOMRB) on 13 August 1999 (in lieu of the Dental Officer Accession Bonus (DOAB) he did execute); that he be allowed to use the renegotiation feature of the DOMRB, to be effective 13 August 2002; and to show he executed a Critical Skill Retention Bonus (CSRB) in September 2002. One of the applicant's requests is that his records be corrected to show he renegotiated his DOMRB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093214C070212

    Original file (03093214C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests approval of a renegotiated Dental Officer Multi-year Retention Bonus (DOMRB) of $14,000.00 a year through the end of fiscal year 2005 (30 September 2005). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing execution of the renegotiated four year DOMRB agreement effective 1 October 2001...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007478

    Original file (20130007478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, a re-negotiated DOMRB contract could be effective on 20 April 2013, 4 years prior to his MRD. e. The applicant may not have gotten timely information regarding the effective date of his re-negotiated DOMRB contract because there was no system-requested calculation of his MRD. The applicant may not have gotten timely information regarding the effective date of his re-negotiated DOMRB contract because there was no system requested calculation of his MRD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021238

    Original file (20130021238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy (ETP) to the recent Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (ASA M&RA) Rescission of Army Policy Regarding Renegotiation of Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Officer Special Pay Contractual Agreements to allow him to renegotiate all of his Army medical officer special pay agreements, to include the Incentive Special Pay (ISP), Multi-Year Incentive Special Pay (MISP), and Multi-Year Special Pay (MSP) with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007301

    Original file (20130007301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he never received his contract nor his payment for the ISP and MASP. There is no record of the 1-year ISP contract at $28,000/year effective 20111001-20120930 being executed, received, filed, or paid. He was eligible for the requested 1-year ISP contract of $28,000/year effective 20111001-20120930, and by him presenting the missing unpaid contract as part of this request, it would be appropriate for payment as directed by Board decision.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009287

    Original file (20120009287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he entered into a Dental Officer Multi-Year Retention Bonus (DOMRB) agreement effective 1 July 2007. The advisory official states the applicant completed his education and training obligation on 30 June 2007, and he was eligible to execute a 4-year DOMRB at the FY07 rate of $35,000 per year effective 1 July 2007 through 30 June 2011. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021443

    Original file (20140021443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provided copies of the following: * Request for DOMRB memorandum she completed and signed on 21 February 2012 for the 4-year DOMRB effective 25 February 2012; the request was approved by her command on the same date * 2014 and 2016 Dental Examiners licenses 3. In an advisory opinion, dated 4 February 2015, the Chief, Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Branch, reiterated the applicant's request. The evidence shows the applicant is currently in a 4-year DOMRB effective 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084472C070212

    Original file (2003084472C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. As of this date, the applicant has not submitted any response to the advisory opinion. A review of the available information shows that the applicant failed to meet the contract execution criteria for entitlement to a DOMRB for the period covering 1 July 2001 through 1 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00594-03

    Original file (00594-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Grover, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...