Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013502
Original file (20130013502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  3 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013502 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Vietnam Service Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states he served in Northeast Thailand from 23 August 1970 to 23 August 1971.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 1976
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record, Part II) 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 29 January 1970 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 31M (radar relay and carrier attendant).  Records show he arrived in Thailand on 23 August 1970.  On 22 December 1970, he was honorably discharged for immediate reenlistment.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 22 December 1970 shows he was authorized the National Defense Service Medal.   

3.  He reenlisted on 23 December 1970 for a period of 3 years.  His reenlistment contract shows he was assigned to the 442nd Signal Battalion in Thailand.  Records show he departed Thailand on 23 August 1971.  On 24 September 1973, he was honorably released from active duty to join the Army National Guard (ARNG).  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 September 1973 does not show any awards.  

4.  After serving 6 months and 20 days of service in the ARNG, he enlisted in the RA on 10 June 1974 for a period of 3 years.  On 15 March 1976, he was honorably discharged.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 1976 shows he was authorized the National Defense Service Medal and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Korea).

5.  Item 5 (Oversea Service) of his DA Form 2-1 shows he served in:

* Thailand from 23 August 1970 through 23 August 1971
* Germany from November 1972 through December 1972
* Korea from 20 June 1974 through 16 July 1975

6.  There is no evidence which shows he served in Vietnam.

7.  There is no evidence that shows his unit in Thailand served in direct support of operations in Vietnam.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award.  Direct support is defined as services being supplied to participating forces in the area of eligibility and includes:

* units, ships, and aircraft providing it involves actually entering the designated area
* ships and aircraft providing fire, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support within the designated area of eligibility

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence to show he served in Vietnam.

2.  There is no evidence that shows the applicant's unit in Thailand served in direct support of operations in Vietnam; i.e, that he actually entered Vietnam.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013502





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013502



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009183

    Original file (20140009183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The prior Board denied the applicant's request for the Vietnam Service Medal because the applicant had not provided and the record did not contain any evidence that the 442nd Signal Battalion provided any direct support of operations in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The applicant has not provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001667

    Original file (20150001667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The other part of his tour was served at Warin, Thailand, operating the AN/TRC 24 station from Ubon AFB to Site Warin. He has made inquiries to people who were stationed at the same locations in the 442nd Signal Battalion, at/or about the same time period, via a Facebook Group "All Thailand, Laos, Cambodia Signal Sites," if they had been issued these awards. Another individual requested reconsideration of an earlier request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Vietnam Campaign Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015855

    Original file (20110015855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show the Vietnam Service Medal with 7 bronze service stars and the Meritorious Unit Commendation (1st Oak Leaf Cluster). The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show the Vietnam Service Medal with service stars representing his participation in 7 campaigns and two awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation. ____________x___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017801

    Original file (20100017801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal for his service during the Vietnam Conflict and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 14 September 1976. The evidence of records does not show the applicant met the criteria for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal for his period of service in Thailand. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010891

    Original file (20100010891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 which was issued at the time of his 1971 discharged contained multiple errors but did indicate the applicant was entitled to both the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). c. Appendix B (The U.S. Army in Thailand During the Vietnam Conflict) of Vietnam Order of Battle (A Complete Illustrated Reference to U.S. Army Combat and Support Forces in Vietnam 1961-1973) authored by Captain Shelby L. Stanton, notes that the 57th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001780

    Original file (20130001780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commercial awards listings provided by the applicant list the basic eligibility requirements for award of the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and state that all recipients of the Vietnam Service Medal are authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. The applicant's records show service in Thailand from 23 May 1962 through 15 July 1963. Therefore, he has not established that he is authorized award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000675

    Original file (20110000675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * A silver and a bronze service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * The Meritorious Unit Commendation instead of the Meritorious Unit Citation * His home of record (HOR) as "305 C----h Street" instead of "309 C----h Street" 2. The applicant completed two periods of foreign service in Thailand, not in Vietnam. The applicant's OMPF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019989

    Original file (20140019989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record showing he served in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021606

    Original file (20130021606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and the Overseas Ribbon (interpreted to mean overseas service bars). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. His unit's contributions during his service in Thailand are not in question; however, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016492

    Original file (20100016492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and any other awards and decorations to which he is entitled. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the AGCM (First Award) to his DD Form 214.