Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012966,
Original file (20130012966,.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  6 May 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012966 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests cancellation of recoupment of a Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB).

2.  The applicant states he contracted for a PSEB in connection with his enlistment in the Wyoming Army National Guard (WYARNG) in 2008.  The contract specified that he had 24 months to become duty military occupational specialty qualified (DMOSQ) as a requirement for processing any bonus payments.  Although he was not DMOSQ, the WYARNG erroneously processed him for a $7,500 payment which he received.  He was subsequently discharged from the ARNG for failing to meet the military education qualification requirement.  He states he failed to become DMOSQ due to the lack of training seat availability which also was due to no fault on his part.  He is currently a full-time student and establishing this debt will create a significant financial hardship for him due to the fact that he only made $15,000 last year before taxes.  He requests that he be granted relief from recoupment due to the errors made that were no fault of his.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 21 November 2008, the applicant enlisted in the WYARNG for a period of 6 years.

2.  In conjunction with his enlistment, he executed a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-6-R-E (Annex X to DD Form 4 - PSEB Addendum).  By signing the form, he verified he was eligible for a PSEB in the amount of $15,000, less taxes, payable in two 50 percent installments.

	a.  He acknowledged:

* he was enlisting into A Battery, 2nd Battalion, 300th Field Artillery to serve at least 6 years in a paid drill status
* he was not qualified for the primary MOS for which he was enlisting
* he was enlisting into a unit in MOS 92Y (Supply Specialist), that was designated as a critical skill MOS
* he would be terminated from bonus eligibility without recoupment if he did not become qualified in or awarded the primary MOS as required for his position within 24 months of enlistment if retraining was required
   
   b.  He further acknowledged he understood he would be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment if he separated from the ARNG for any reason unless due to death, injury, illness, or other impairment not the result of his own misconduct.
   
   c.  He also acknowledged with his initials in Section II, paragraph 2b of the PSEB Addendum that he understood his initial bonus payment would not be processed until he became DMOSQ.

3.  On 30 November 2009, he failed a record Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). 

4.  A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) contained in his records shows he served on active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom from 15 April 2009 through 3 May 2010. 

5.  DA Forms 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Actions (FLAG)) contained in his record show flags were initiated on the applicant effective 19 September 2010 for APFT and weight control program failure.

6.  He was flagged again for weight control program failure effective 16 April 2011. 

7.  On 10 May 2012, he stated in an affidavit that he did not feel he had the time to put forth the needed work to meet the Army body composition standards and as a result would not attend 92Y MOS training.  As a result, he was requesting a discharge from the WYARNG under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 9.

8.  On 3 July 2012, his commander recommended the applicant's separation from the WYARNG.  His commander stated he had given the applicant every opportunity to improve his height/weight in order to attend an MOSQ school, but he continued to fail. 

9.  On 15 August 2012, his commander notified him he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178, chapter 9 for unsatisfactory performance.  He informed the applicant of his rights and informed him that he was recommending separation because the applicant had failed to become MOS qualified within the 24-month time frame.  He indicated he was recommending the applicant be given a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification.

10.  A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) shows effective 20 September 2012 his duty status was changed to civilian because he was discharged due to unsatisfactory performance (non-MOSQ) in accordance with National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), paragraph 6-35, and Army Regulation 135-178, chapter 9.

11.  On 20 September 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative requirements indicating further duty was determined to be inappropriate because the applicant was obviously resisting all rehabilitative attempts.  He approved the applicant's discharge under honorable conditions.

12.  The State of Wyoming Adjutant General's Office Orders 270-017, dated 26 September 2012, show he was discharged effective 20 September 2012.  The orders show he was a SRIP participant and that his SRIP (enlisted cash bonus) was to be terminated without recoupment with a termination date of 20 September 2012. 

13.  The WYARNG Adjutant General endorsed the applicant's request for relief from recoupment.  He stated he believed that the applicant should not be penalized for the WYARNG Education Office's lack of due diligence.  He stated that although the applicant was not eligible to have the first bonus payment processed until he became DMOSQ the WYARNG processed the first payment upon his enlistment in the WYARNG and the applicant received a payment of $7,500.  Effective 20 September 2012 the applicant was discharged for failure to meet military education qualifications/requirements.  He stated the applicant failed to become DMOSQ due to the lack of training seat availability which also was due to no fault of the applicant.  He requested that the applicant be granted relief from recoupment due to the errors made at no fault of his own.  

14.  On 6 May 2013, the NGB denied his request for an exception to policy.  NGB stated the State Incentive Manager would terminate the applicant's bonus with recoupment.  NGB stated that the applicant was discharged or separated prior to completion of his service obligation which violated ARNG SRIP 07-06 (10 August 2007 to 28 February 2009).  He did not complete MOS training within 24 months which violated ARNG SRIP 07-06.  The applicant's contract/agreement detailed, in pertinent part, a contracted bonus addendum/agreement amount of $15,000 with a contracted MOS of 92Y.

15.  During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from NGB, Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division.  The advisory official recommended the applicant's request be denied.  The NGB official stated that a review of the applicant's case shows he was offered and contracted for the PSEB for a 6-year enlistment in the amount of $15,000.  He acknowledged he was not DMOSQ, had to be retrained/could not be processed for initial payment until DMOSQ per his PSEB addendum, and had 24 months to become DMOSQ.  The applicant erroneously received an initial payment of $7,500 upon enlistment.  Though the applicant deployed to Iraq from 15 April 2009 to 3 May 2010 he had 2 years from his deployment ending date to his ARNG discharge date to attend school.  There is nothing in his records to substantiate a reason why he did not attend MOS school for 92Y.  The applicant was discharged on 12 September 2012 for failure to meet military education/qualification requirements per his enlistment contract.

16.  The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not submit a response.

17.  Army Regulation 135-178, chapter 9, provides for discharging a Soldier when it is determined under the guidance set forth in chapter 2, section I, the Soldier is unqualified for further military service by reason of unsatisfactory performance.

18.  ARNG SRIP Policy Number 07-06, effective 10 August 2007 to 28 February 2009, established policy to administer ARNG incentives during the effective period.

	a.  The policy provided for termination of an incentive with recoupment if entitlement to the incentive was terminated for any reason before the fulfillment of the service described in the member's written agreement.  Unless granted relief, the member was required to refund any unearned amount to the Government if the incentive was terminated for any of the following reasons:

		(1)  Fails to participate satisfactorily in required training during the entire period of service agreed to in accordance with the written agreement unless the failure to participate satisfactorily was due to reasons beyond control of the member (i.e., death, injury, illness, or other impairment).

		(2) Separates from the ARNG for any reason (including enlistment or voluntary order to active duty in the active forces).  Exceptions to recoupment (termination without recoupment are listed in paragraph 6 of this policy memorandum.)  

	b.  The policy provided for a $15,000 PSEB for enlistees who enlisted for a critical skill MOS.

	c.  The policy further provided that Soldiers who elected to enlist non-MOSQ into one of the State's top 30 MOS's must become MOSQ for their position within 24 months of enlistment or their bonus would be terminated.  Soldiers must have been DMOSQ prior to receiving payments. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the available evidence does not support cancellation of recoupment of his PSEB.

2.  He was erroneously paid half ($7,500 minus taxes) of his PSEB upon his enlistment.

3.  The basic issue in this case is the applicant's failure to serve in an active status in the WYARNG for the contractual period of 6 years.  On 21 November 2008, he signed a PSEB contract that clearly stated he would be terminated from bonus eligibility if he failed to become DMOSQ within 24 months of his enlistment and terminated with recoupment if he was separated from the ARNG for any reason unless due to death, injury, illness, or other impairment not the result of own misconduct.

4.  Evidence shows the applicant failed to complete the required MOS training and was never awarded the MOS for which he contracted.  Evidence further shows he was flagged for failing to pass the APFT and failing to maintain Army height and weight standards.  It appears his being flagged was the reason for his not attending the required schooling.  He subsequently signed an affidavit stating he did not feel he could attain the Army height and weight standards and requested discharge from the ARNG.

5.  He was separated from the ARNG for a reason requiring termination and recoupment of his bonus.  The evidence shows he was properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the applicable regulations, all requirements of law and regulation were met, and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.

6.  The applicant failed to fulfill the terms of his PSEB contract.  As a result, he is subject to termination and recoupment of the bonus monies he was paid in accordance with the terms clearly stated in his contract.  There is no evidence of inequity or injustice in the decision to recoup the PSEB he did not earn.

7.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012966



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012966



6


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20130012966

    Original file (AR20130012966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 12 September 2012 for failure to meet military education/qualification requirements per his enlistment contract. On 21 November 2008, he signed a PSEB contract that clearly stated he would be terminated from bonus eligibility if he failed to become DMOSQ within 24 months of his enlistment and terminated with recoupment if he was separated from the ARNG for any reason unless due to death, injury, illness, or other impairment not the result of own misconduct. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012966

    Original file (20130012966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 12 September 2012 for failure to meet military education/qualification requirements per his enlistment contract. On 21 November 2008, he signed a PSEB contract that clearly stated he would be terminated from bonus eligibility if he failed to become DMOSQ within 24 months of his enlistment and terminated with recoupment if he was separated from the ARNG for any reason unless due to death, injury, illness, or other impairment not the result of own misconduct. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010270

    Original file (20140010270 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) shows the applicant enlisted in the ARNG of the United States (ARNGUS) and CAARNG on 24 June 2005 for a period of 6 years. The applicant contends that his SLRP eligibility should be reinstated and he should be relieved of the debt because he was eligible to participate in the SLRP; the service representative failed to complete an SLRP Addendum at the time of his enlistment; he subsequently completed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009094

    Original file (20140009094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show entitlement to the $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that he contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the WYARNG on 15 April 2009 for a period of 6 years in MOS 68W and his enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The Deputy G1 stated that although MOS 68W could not be validated as an authorized critical skill, a review of the applicant's DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003479

    Original file (20120003479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military record shows he executed a 3-year enlistment in the TXARNG on 8 March 2007 for 3 years with prior USN enlisted service. (2) I am not qualified in the primary MOS for which I am enlisting, but have enlisted into an NGB or State Critical Skill MOS and agree to attend formal training and become qualified in my contracted MOS within 24 months of my date of enlistment." He acknowledges he was not MOS qualified at the time of his enlistment; therefore, the contract...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001125

    Original file (20130001125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from recoupment of a prior service enlistment bonus (PSEB) in the amount of $15,000. He submitted his: a. DD Form 1966/1, dated 26 May 2006, which shows he: * enlisted in the WYARNG on 26 May 2006 * he enlisted in the WYARNG for a PSEB * enlisted in MOS 91W1O (now MOS 68W) (health care specialist) b. NGB Form 600-7-4-R-E, dated 26 May 2006, which shows he: * was qualified in and held the primary MOS to which he was assigned * enlisted for a 6-year PSEB * would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013916

    Original file (20140013916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows on 23 April 2008 the applicant enlisted for a PSEB in the amount of $15,000. Therefore, in the interest of equity it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record to show he was authorized the PSEB in the amount of $15,000, that he fulfilled his contractual obligation, and reimbursing him the total amount of debt he has already paid. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019844

    Original file (20110019844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A KYARNG memorandum requests that the NGB grant the applicant an exception to policy to allow him to receive an SRIP bonus. It stated: * the applicant was not qualified to receive the 3-year, $7,500 prior service CUIC bonus for which he enlisted * when the applicant enlisted, a 6-year, $15,000 prior service CUIC bonus was offered * however, the applicant did not qualify for that because he only enlisted for 3 years 5. The applicant signed a bonus addendum to his enlistment contract in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029787

    Original file (20100029787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states when she enlisted in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG), the addendum she signed stated she would receive a bonus if she completed training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 42A (Human Resources Specialist) and became duty MOS qualified (DMOSQ) within 24 months of her enlistment. She was told MOS 42A was a critical MOS and she would receive the PSEB; accordingly, she proceeded to sign the PSEB addendum and the enlistment contract. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001331

    Original file (20140001331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (1) The Request for ETP was denied for the following discrepancies: * the applicant was not DMOSQ for the contracted incentive * incentive addendum contains a missing signature from the enlisting official * the applicant was paid on unauthorized loans (2) It also shows the applicant was not DMOSQ for MOS 88M upon enlistment and that he completed training for MOS 88M on 6 September 2008. Records show the applicant enlisted in the MNARNG on 8 April 2006 for a period of 6 years and his...