Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010877C071029
Original file (20060010877C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        1 March 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010877


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Thomas M. Ray                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James R. Hastie               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the narrative reason for her
separation be changed.

2.  The applicant states the information that she was separated due to a
locally-imposed bar to reenlistment is hindering her placement in an Active
Guard Reserve (AGR) position.  After she served six months in Iraq during
Operation Desert Storm, they were offering early outs for Soldiers as part
of a troop reduction program.  She took advantage of it.  She does not
understand the reason for the bar to reenlistment.  She is missing out on
AGR jobs because of the bar to reenlistment, and she does not even
understand why she received it in the first place.

3.  The applicant provides two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty), one for the period ending 31 October 1991 and
one for the period ending 21 December 2005; a memorandum, dated 30 January
2007, from her current Army National Guard (ARNG) battalion operations
sergeant; an extract from Army Regulation 135-15; active duty for special
work (ADSW) orders dated 24 August 2004; ADSW orders dated 24 September
2004 with amendments dated 8 October 2004 and 19 May 2005; ADSW orders
dated 19 April 2006; ADSW orders dated 27 June 2006; and a DA Form 4836
(Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) dated 19 April 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 February 1988.  She
was promoted to Specialist, E-4 on 16 May 1989.

2.  The applicant served in Southwest Asia from 28 October 1990 to 15 April
1991.

3.  On 29 July 1991, the applicant’s commander initiated a local bar to
reenlistment on her.  He cited as the reason for the bar the applicant’s
refusal to attend the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC).  He
stated attendance at PLDC was a major progression in a junior
noncommissioned officer’s development and [the applicant’s] refusing
attendance demonstrated a lack of motivation, apathy, and unwillingness to
advance.

4.  On 29 July 1991, the applicant acknowledged that she was counseled and
advised of the basis for the bar to reenlistment and she did not desire to
submit a statement in her own behalf.  The locally-imposed bar to
reenlistment was approved on 12 August 1991.  On 14 August 1991, the
applicant indicated that she would not appeal the bar to reenlistment.

5.  On 2 October 1991, the applicant requested separation.  The DA Form
4187 (Personnel Action) indicates that she had received a locally-imposed
bar to reenlistment and did not anticipate overcoming the bar.

6.  On 31 October 1991, the applicant was released from active duty under
the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, in pay grade E-
4, after completing 3 years, 8 months, and 15 days of creditable active
service with no lost time.  She was given a separation designator (SPD)
code of KGF (voluntary discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, paragraph 16-5a   or b, Headquarters, Department of the Army or
locally-imposed bar to reenlistment).  (There was no SPD code for a
voluntary transfer under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,
paragraph 16-5b).  The narrative reason for separation was “LOCALLY IMPOSED
BAR TO REENLISTMENT.”  She was transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR)
to complete her military service obligation.

7.  Effective 20 February 1996, the applicant was honorably discharged from
the USAR.

8.  On 11 July 2003, the applicant enlisted in the ARNG.

9.  Army Regulation 135-18 establishes policies for obtaining and
separating Army National Guard of the United States, ARNG, and USAR
personnel serving as members of the AGR program.  Table 2-3 gives
nonwaivable disqualifications for entry in the program.  Rule H states an
enlisted Soldier barred from reenlistment in the Army National Guard of the
United States or the USAR or on whom a bar to reenlistment has been
initiated is a nonwaivable disqualification.

10.  In a previous case pertaining to a Soldier in similar circumstances
requesting a USAR AGR position, a staff member from the AGR Accessions
Team, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (currently the U. S. Army Human
Resources Command – St. Louis) indicated that if an individual does not
have a current bar to reenlistment, there should be no problem in
requesting entry into the AGR program.  The individual would not
necessarily be selected for the program but he or she would not be
automatically disqualified from entry.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant received a locally-imposed
bar to reenlistment in July 1991 for refusing to attend PLDC.  It appears
she may have been offered early separation as part of a troop reduction
program; however, her voluntary separation was processed under the
provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b because she did not
anticipate being able to overcome the bar to reenlistment.  Therefore, she
was properly separated with a narrative reason of “LOCALLY IMPOSED BAR TO
REENLISTMENT.”

2.  However, it appears the ARNG waived her reenlistment disqualification
and allowed her to enlist in July 2003.  It appears she is having a
successful career.  There is no error in her records concerning her
narrative reason for separation on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 31
October 1991.

3.  However, it appears the applicant may be receiving erroneous
information about her qualification for entry into the AGR program based
upon Rule H in Table 2-3, Army Regulation 135-18.  She does not appear to
have a nonwaivable disqualification for entry into the AGR program under
these rules.  She is not barred from reenlistment in the Army National
Guard of the United States or the USAR.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__tmr___  __jcr___  __jrh___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  __Thomas M. Ray_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060010877                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20070301                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schwartz                            |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.02                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071672C070402

    Original file (2002071672C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Rule K states that an enlisted soldier barred from reenlistment in the Army National Guard or the USAR or on whom a bar to reenlistment has been initiated is a nonwaivable disqualification. On 21 August 2002, Mrs. Roberts from the AGR Accessions Team, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command indicated in a phone conversation that if an individual does not have a current bar...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003324

    Original file (20080003324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 November 1992, the applicant submitted a request to be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 16-5(b), due to his inability to overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence shows that the applicant was voluntarily discharged under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000121C070206

    Original file (20050000121C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request that item 27 (Reenlistment Code) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to acceptable codes to reenlist. The regulation, in effect at the time, states the reason for discharge based on separation code “KGF” is “HQDA [Headquarters, Department of the Army] imposed bar to reenlistment; or locally imposed bar to reenlistment” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017042

    Original file (20060017042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code "3" be changed to RE "1" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with a separation date of 1 August 1991, in order to reenlist in the Regular Army. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, Soldiers will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003831

    Original file (20090003831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 25 (Separation Authority) of the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon separation indicates he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 16-5b of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) by reason of locally imposed bar to reenlistment. It stated, in pertinent part, that the SPD code KGF was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075047C070403

    Original file (2002075047C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Finally, the applicant has offered no explanation either for the delay in raising her alleged prior completion of PLDC or for her apparent failure to mention it at the time of her original separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004317C070208

    Original file (20040004317C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she is presently serving in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and would like the opportunity to serve on active duty as a member of the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) program. The Chief of Staff also states that the applicant’s service as a member of the AGR program would be a benefit to the unit and a waiver of her RE-3 code is necessary to for her apply. As a result, her discharge was proper and equitable, and the RE-3 code she received was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006867

    Original file (20140006867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the $20,000 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that she contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Applicant's request for an ETP for payment of the SLRP incentive in which she provided a summary of her enlistment in the OHARNG, training, and DMOSQ in MOS 42A. Records show the applicant enlisted in the OHARNG on 9 August 2007 for a period of 6 years in MOS 42A and her enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010590

    Original file (20130010590.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. On 28 June 2005, less than a month after being released from active duty, he received orders assigning him to a local USAR military police (MP) unit which he never requested. The advisory official stated the applicant spent 4 years serving on active duty and it was highly unlikely that he would sign a blank DA Form 4187. The orders assigning him to the 744th MP Battalion show he voluntarily requested release from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to be assigned to the unit.