Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012083
Original file (20130012083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		 

		BOARD DATE:	  10 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012083 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. 

2.  He states he was promoted to SSG/E-6 in September or October 1989 while he was serving in Germany, but the promotion was not entered in his records.  He does not have a copy of his promotion order. 

3.  He provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served in the Regular Army (RA) from 2 June 1972 to 30 May 1975.  On 15 June 1980, he enlisted again in the RA, where he served for approximately 11 years.  

3.  Orders in his record show he was promoted to specialist five/E-5 (later converted to sergeant (SGT)) effective 1 November 1982.  

4.  His record does not contain orders promoting him to SSG/E-6.  However, a DA Form 2166-7 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period ending April 1990 shows he held the rank of SSG with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 August 1989.  

5.  On 11 May 1990, his battalion commander imposed nonjudicial punishment (NJP) against him under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for operating a vehicle while drunk and leaving the scene of an accident in which he was involved without making his identity known.  His commander imposed punishment that included reduction to SGT/E-5.  The applicant's appeal of the punishment was denied.  

6.  His NCOER for the period ending October 1990 shows he held the rank of SGT with a DOR of 11 May 1990.  

7.  On 8 July 1991, he was honorably discharged as a SGT/E-5.  Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued at that time shows the effective date of his pay grade was 31 May 1990.  

8.  He later served in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) and U.S. Army Reserve.  He was honorably discharged from the ALARNG on 5 October 1998 as a SGT/E-5, and he was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve effective 13 August 2002 as a SGT/E-5.  

9.  His record is void of documentation showing he was promoted to SSG/E-6 after his reduction to SGT/E-5 on 11 May 1990.

10.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), in effect at the time of his reduction to SGT/E-5, provided the authority for the promotion and reduction of enlisted personnel.  It stated that field grade commanders of any organizations authorized a lieutenant colonel or higher grade commander were authorized to administratively reduce Soldiers in pay grades E-5 and E-6 for misconduct under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 during his second RA enlistment; however, shortly after he was promoted he received field-grade NJP reducing him to SGT/E-5.  There is no evidence indicating that he was promoted to SSG/E-6 after his reduction.  His promotion and reduction are documented in his record.  

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the relief he has requested.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012083





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012083



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018980

    Original file (20130018980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired in the highest rank/pay grade he held, which was staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 15 November 1993 and he served in that rank/pay grade in an active status until he was discharged from the USAR on 19 April 1995. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003630

    Original file (20130003630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 14 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130003630 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The IG investigation indicated that he met the standard and that his promotion packet should have been sent forward to the promotion board. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant’s service in the highest grade he held (pay grade E-6) was satisfactory.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017341

    Original file (20090017341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that an Enlisted STAB denied the applicant's request to remove the DA QMP bar to reenlistment and that an Enlisted Special Review Board denied his request to remove the relief for cause NCOER. There is no evidence the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 to show he was retired from active duty in the rank of SSG/pay grade E-6 with an effective date of pay grade of 1 August 1993. A letter from the applicant to DFAS, dated 12 May 2009, in which he stated that he retired from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007478

    Original file (20060007478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that following her relocation to Georgia in 2001 she attempted to get a different TPU (Troop Program Unit) assignment but was unable to do so. All of the correspondence and orders issued during this period list her rank as a SGT and was sent to addresses in Mississippi. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), paragraph 4-15 (Involuntary reassignment for unsatisfactory participation) states that a TPU Soldier who has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003382

    Original file (20130003382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. When Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 08-033, subject: (Updated) AAA-294 Enlisted Promotion Report – Automatic List Integration Section for Staff Sergeant) was issued on 1 February 2008, he was never informed of its provisions and he was not aware of any action by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to put him on the standing list for promotion to SSG/E-6. The company commander, first sergeant, and the battalion command sergeant major formed negative opinions of him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002900

    Original file (20150002900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records by – * removing a Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Evaluation Report (NCOER) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) * replacing the NCOER with the NCOER previously prepared by the rater and senior rater * crediting him with completing 26 years of active Federal service (AFS) * promoting him to the rank of master sergeant (MSG)/pay grade E-8 with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 March 1990 * placing him on the retired list in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004451

    Original file (20140004451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140004451 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. It states, in pertinent part, that each retired enlisted member of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when his active service plus his service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which he/she served on active duty satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021880

    Original file (20110021880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by voiding his reduction in rank to sergeant (SGT), pay grade E-5. b. Paragraph 10-16 (Reductions for Failure to complete Training) provides that Soldiers conditionally promoted in accordance with paragraph 1–27 of this regulation are administratively reduced to the grade previously held upon failure to complete the training requirement established in that provision. The applicant contends that his military records should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018041

    Original file (20140018041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's previous request for removal a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 20 August 2013, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). Counsel provides: * DA Form 2627 * DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by Investigation Officer (IO)/Board of Officers) * Certificate of Promotion, dated 1 March 2013 * two orders * a Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and...