Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018980
Original file (20130018980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 August 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018980 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired in the highest rank/pay grade he held, which was staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  He states that he was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 15 November 1993 while he was serving on active duty with the Reserves.

3.  He provides his SSG/E-6 promotion orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows he was born on 7 March 1953.  He enlisted in Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) on 5 May 1974.  On 11 February 1975, he was relieved from duty with the ALARNG and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Ready Reserve).

2.  On 20 September 1990, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm.  On 7 July 1991, he was released from active duty and returned to his USAR unit.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for this period of active duty service shows he held the rank/pay grade of SGT/E-5 at the time of this transfer.

3.  On 7 March 1992, he reenlisted in the USAR for a period of 3 years in the rank/pay grade of SGT/E-5.

4.  Headquarters, 375th Transportation Group (Composite), Mobile, AL, Orders 9-3, dated 12 October 1993, show the applicant was promoted from SGT/E-5 to SSG/E-6 with an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 15 November 1993.

5.  On 10 April 1994, the applicant reviewed his DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record - Enlisted) for accuracy and made manual corrections to his rank/pay grade from SGT/E-5 to SSG/E-6 and to show his DOR as 15 November 1993.  On the same date, he reviewed his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) which shows his rank/pay grade as SSG/E-6 with a promotion effective date of 15 November 1993.

6.  His DA Form 2166-7 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the period ending October 1994 shows his rank/pay grade at the time was SSG/E-6 with a DOR of 15 November 1993.

7.  On 11 January 1995, the applicant's company commander requested notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 be issued to SSG [applicant's name] in the form of a 20-Year Letter under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve - Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service).

8.  Headquarters, USAR Command, Atlanta, GA, Orders 95-135-091, dated 19 April 1995, show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 19 April 1995.  The standard name line of this order shows his rank as SGT.

9.  The applicant's U.S. Army Human Resources Command (AHRC) Form 249-2-E (USAHRC - Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), prepared 4 May 2006, shows his rank as SGT and that he had completed a total of 21 years of qualifying service for retirement.

10.  The applicant completed a DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits).  On the first page of this form, in item 4 (Highest Military Paygrade Held) he entered "SGT/E5" and in item 10 (Grade or Rating) he entered "SGT/E6."  On the second page of this form, in item 4 he entered "SGT/E5" and in item 10 entered "SSG/E6."  He also indicated that he held the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6 during retirement years 1994 through 1996.  His projected date of retirement shown on the form was 7 March 2013, based upon his 60th birthday.

11.  The applicant completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel).  In item 4 (Rank Pay Grade/Branch of Service) he indicated his rank/pay grade was SSG/E-6.  His projected date of retirement shown on the form was 7 March 2013, based upon his 60th birthday.
12.  On 5 March 2013, the Chief, Retired Pay Branch, USAHRC, Fort Knox, KY, notified the applicant that his application for retired pay had been approved and provided him a copy of his Certificate of Retirement and order affecting his retired pay.  In this letter, she addressed the applicant as "Sergeant."

13.  USAHRC, Fort Knox, Orders C02-391367, dated 5 March 2013, show the applicant was retired and placed on the retired list in the retired rank/grade of
SGT/E-5 on "2013 March 2013."

14.  His record is void of any derogatory information or evidence indicating he that was subjected to punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) which resulted in an involuntary reduction in rank/pay grade.

15.  Army Regulation 135-180, paragraph 2-11 states that service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory and the case will be forwarded to the Secretary of the Army’s Ad Hoc Review Board for final determination of the Soldier’s retirement grade if, during the mandatory review of the Soldier's records by the Retired Activities Directorate, it is determined that revision to a lower grade was expressly for prejudice or cause or there is information in the Soldier's service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.  If the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged prior to 25 February 1975, retired grade will be that which the Soldier held at the time of transfer to the Retired Reserve or discharge, unless the Soldier held a higher grade at least 185 days or six calendar months on active duty or in an active reserve status as a commissioned officer or enlisted Soldier.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was retired in the highest rank/pay grade he held, which was SSG/E-6 instead of SGT/E-5.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 15 November 1993 and he served in that rank/pay grade in an active status until he was discharged from the USAR on 19 April 1995.  His record is void of any derogatory information or evidence indicating he was subjected to punishment under the UCMJ which resulted in an involuntary reduction in rank/pay grade.  

3.  It appears the applicant's rank/pay grade was not properly reflected in the automated databases and resulted in his rank/pay grade being erroneously shown as SGT/E-5 on both his discharge orders and his retirement orders.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction of his record to show he was discharged in the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6 on 19 April 1995 and retired in the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6 effective 7 March 2013.

5.  He is also entitled to have his retired pay recomputed based on the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6 and receive any back retired pay he is entitled to receive as a result of this correction.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending his discharge orders (Orders 95-135-091, dated 19 April 1995) to show he was discharged in the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6 effective 19 April 1995;

	b.  amending his retirement orders (Orders C02-391367, dated 5 March 2013) to show he was retired in the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6 effective 7 March 2013; 

	c.  recomputing his retired pay entitlements based on the rank/pay grade of SSG/E-6; and









	d.  providing him all back retired pay he is entitled to receive as a result of this correction.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018980



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018980



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003630

    Original file (20130003630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 14 November 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130003630 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The IG investigation indicated that he met the standard and that his promotion packet should have been sent forward to the promotion board. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant’s service in the highest grade he held (pay grade E-6) was satisfactory.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009058

    Original file (20130009058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the reduction order is in error because she should not have been reduced to SPC in accordance with Army Regulation 140-158 (Army Reserve Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), paragraph 7-12d (Failure to meet conditional promotion Noncommissioned Officer Education System (NCOES) requirements). Evidence shows her correct SSN is xxx-xx-3xxx. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014282

    Original file (20130014282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) imposed on 7 April 1990 from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) and b. reversal of the reduction in rank imposed as nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 7 April 1990 in the DA Form 2627. The applicant states: a. The evidence shows he was promoted to SFC/E-7 in the NMARNG in August 1982 and he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001879

    Original file (20140001879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 December 1984, Headquarters, 731st Maintenance Battalion published Orders 36-1 promoting him to the rank of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 in military occupational specialty 94B (Cook), effective 15 December 1984. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states, in pertinent part, that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013158

    Original file (20080013158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: ARNG Current Annual Statement, dated 2 November 2005; National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), effective 1 June 1998; Office of the Adjutant General of Virginia (OTAG) Orders 132-043, dated 12 May 1998; 1995 SSG Promotion List, dated 11 February 1996; Headquarters, 80th Division (Institutional Training) Orders 135-18, dated 30 November 1994; 229th Engineer Battalion, 29th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002888

    Original file (20110002888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was retired in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 and to show he was a SSG/E-6 from October 1991 to February 1993. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 when he was discharged from the NCARNG on 18 April 2005. Based on the available evidence, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show he held the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 from October 1991 to February 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001637

    Original file (20150001637.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * he held the rank of SSG for at least 3 years * his military records were lost and as such he was unable to either prove or disprove his contention * a discharge appeals board for the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG), convened on 9 May 2014, has since affirmed he was administratively reduced from SSG to SGT due to a change in the unit's Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTOE); the board recommended his rank be restored to SSG * on 18 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017218

    Original file (20070017218.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders C-06-02539, dated 20 June 1986 (Relief from the USAR Control Group-Reinforcement). He is currently a retired USAR SGT/E-5. In light of the applicant’s over four years of satisfactory service as a SSG/E-6, and in light of the fact that he was not reduced for misconduct or inefficiency, he should have been placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade at the time of his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014718

    Original file (20090014718.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1406(b)(2) provides for non-regular service retirement and states that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the armed forces. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served on active duty from 1967 to 1970...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015308

    Original file (20090015308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve at age 60 in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. Commanders may consider any misconduct, to include a record of unexcused absences or unsatisfactory participation, as evidence of inefficiency. The evidence of records shows the applicant held the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 from 1981 through 1989.