Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011918
Original file (20130011918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011918 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he served in Iraq and participated multiple times in combat operations.  During the combat operations, he was engaged in direct combat with the enemy on numerous occasions.  During his time in Iraq he served with 4th Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division.  Upon his release from active duty, his unit was issued the CIB.  He further requests the Board verify his claim by a detailed evaluation of his unit's missions, locales of deployment and operational mission statuses.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Although the applicant lists the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs as Counsel, they did not render a request on the applicant's behalf.

2.  Counsel provides no additional statement. 

3.  Counsel provides no additional evidence.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 September 2005.  After completing training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS)     11B (Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's Enlisted Record Brief and DD Form 214 show he was deployed to Iraq for the period 23 July through 23 December 2007.  

4.  On 30 January 2010, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 4 years, 4 months, and 11 days of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show award of the CIB.

5.  His records do not contain any orders or evidence and the applicant does not provide any evidence which would support award of the CIB.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry or special forces specialty and must have satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger, or special forces unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-9 contains guidance on the burden of proof.  It states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity, which is that what the Army did was correct.  The ABCMR is not an investigative body and decides cases based on the evidence that is presented in the military records provided and the independent evidence submitted with the application.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are three requirements for award of the CIB: the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

2.  In this case, there are no orders on file and he provides none to show he was awarded the CIB.  His infantry MOS and his service in Iraq are not in question.  However, there is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he was actively present and assigned to an infantry unit while the unit engaged in active ground combat.  

3.  Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of the orders or official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with a qualifying infantry unit when the unit was engaged in active ground combat, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support award of the CIB or adding it to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011918





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011918



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020577

    Original file (20120020577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 January 2006 * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings, dated 29 March 2012 * DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) * CAB orders * Excerpts from Army Regulation 600-8-22 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012143

    Original file (20080012143.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Although the applicant contends that he was awarded the CIB, there is no corroborating evidence in his official military record. Further, there is no evidence that he actively participated in ground combat, a requirement for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009913

    Original file (20080009913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). On 3 October 2007, he was released from active duty upon completion of his required active service and returned to his unit in the CAARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002979

    Original file (20080002979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was awarded the CIB in Iraq, but it is not shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show award of the CIB. In the absence of evidence that the applicant actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030071

    Original file (20100030071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) in lieu of the Combat Action Badge (CAB). The applicant states he served as an infantryman in Iraq and he received the CAB for being engaged by the enemy during Operation Iraqi Freedom. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Permanent Order 211-017, dated 29 July 2009, awarding the applicant the CAB; b. awarding the applicant the CIB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018538

    Original file (20110018538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge: the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with a qualifying infantry unit when the unit was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022171

    Original file (20120022171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section VIII (Awards and Decorations) of his Enlisted Record Brief, dated 19 May 2012, does not show the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. A Soldier must be personally present and under hostile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027092

    Original file (20100027092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. The evidence of record shows he served in MOS 11B, while assigned to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005934

    Original file (20130005934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011141

    Original file (20110011141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence in his record which indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB during his active duty service. However, the evidence does not show he served in active ground combat during this period of service. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.