Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005934
Original file (20130005934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005934 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division in Iraq from 21 October 2004 through 22 March 2005 and he was awarded the CIB.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 May 2004 and he held military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

3.  On 6 July 2007, he was honorably discharged by reason of parenthood.  He completed 3 years, 1 month, and 17 days of creditable active service.  His
DD Form 214 shows he served in Iraq from 21 October 2004 through 22 March 2005.  It does not show the CIB among his list of awards.

4.  The available records do not show the applicant's unit of assignment during his deployment; however, he indicates in his application that he was assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division during his service in Iraq.

5.  His Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) is void of orders awarding him the CIB.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army Soldier must have an infantry or special forces specialty/military occupational specialty and must have satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger, or special forces unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  A Soldier must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy, to close with and destroy the enemy with direct fires.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the CIB.

2.  The evidence clearly shows he was awarded an infantry MOS; however, 
there is no evidence to show he ever engaged in active ground combat, there is no available evidence showing he was ever recommended for the CIB or that orders were issued authorizing this badge, and he did not provide CIB orders.


3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005934



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005934



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016493

    Original file (20090016493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records which show he was awarded the CIB. Additionally appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show that the applicant has met all of the requirements for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009921

    Original file (20100009921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record the applicant served in active ground combat during his tour in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and as a result concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, there is no indication he was ever assigned to an infantry staff headquarters or to non-infantry duties during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, and given his unit regularly participated in combat operations and was cited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021090

    Original file (20120021090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 11 April 1971 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry unit, but the individual must have been present and participated with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011505

    Original file (20140011505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140011505 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. A search of records of the names provided by the platoon sergeant indicates that at least seven of the members of the patrol received either the CIB or the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) for the 10 December 2006 engagement. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007613

    Original file (20080007613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. The evidence shows the applicant held an infantry MOS, and he was deployed to Southwest Asia from 15 February 1991 to 15 March 1991 (1 month).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005358

    Original file (20120005358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel, Constituent Services, Office of Congressman C____ C____ of Minnesota, states: * the applicant was awarded the CIB while assigned to a cavalry unit serving in the Republic of Vietnam * there was no discussion or conclusion related to a photograph he submitted showing the CIB on his fatigue uniform * a reasonable conclusion would be that a young Soldier serving in Vietnam for more than a year while assigned to a cavalry unit as a light weapons infantryman would be engaged in combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019901

    Original file (20120019901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * May/June 2012 issue of the Vietnam Veterans of America Magazine, page 41 * 1st Cavalry Division Vietnam Combat Certificate * letter from the applicant to this Board, dated 15 August 2011 * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), pages 2, 3, and 4 * Operational Report, 1st Cavalry Division, for the period ending 30 April 1970, dated 12 November 1970 * 5th Battalion, 7th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010106C071029

    Original file (20060010106C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. However, there are no orders, or other documents on file that show he was ever recommended for, or awarded either the CIB or CMB while he was serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s combat service in the RVN; however, combat service alone does not support award of the CMB or CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030114

    Original file (20100030114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, did not authorize Armor/Air Cavalry officers award of the CIB although they may have served as Aero Medical Rifle Platoon Commander. The commanding officer then assigns appropriate duties. Absent any evidence of record showing that the applicant held and served in an infantry specialty in ground combat with a qualifying infantry unit during his RVN tour, or that he was awarded the CIB by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003247

    Original file (20070003247.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that his records do not show that he was awarded the CIB. Paragraph 8-6 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.