Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011315
Original file (20130011315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		BOARD DATE:	  3 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011315 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show promotion to the rank of staff sergeant/pay grade E-6.

2.  The applicant states he was on the promotion list at the time he was released from active duty and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL); however, he should have been promoted when he was placed on the TDRL.  Due to the government shutdown, the civilian personnel processing his separation missed the provision of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20c.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* an excerpt from Army Regulation 600-8-19 
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* separation orders
* Enlisted Record Brief
* two DA Forms 31 (Request and Authorization for Leave)
* three DA Forms 3349 (Physical Profile)
* DA Form 7652 (Physical Disability Evaluation System Commander's Performance and Functional Statement)
* Medical Evaluation Board (MEB)
* Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 March 2000 and served in military occupational specialties 14S (Avenger Crewmember) and 92W (Water Treatment Specialist).  

2.  His service included two tours in Iraq and one in Kuwait.

3.  The applicant was afforded medical evaluations and referrals through the MEB/PEB process.  He concurred with the findings that he was unfit for duty based on the diagnoses of:

* post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
* migraine headaches
* osteoarthritis of the left knee
* left ankle bone spur with post-surgical scarring
* bilateral hallus valgus (flat feet) with post-surgical bunionectomy scarring

4.  The PEB recommended he be placed on the TDRL with a 70 percent disability rating.

5.  The DA Form 7652 reports and a review of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) Promotion Selection Board results confirm the applicant was on the centralized or semi-centralized promotion list.

6.  U.S. Army Installation Management Command Orders 059-1304, dated 28 February 2013, show the applicant retired effective 20 May 2013 and he was placed on the retired list effective 21 May 2013 in the rank of sergeant. 

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was retired by reason of Temporary (Enhanced) Disability in the rank of sergeant/pay grade E-5.  He had completed 13 years, 2 months, and 18 days of creditable service with no lost time.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 1–20 states:

   a.  Soldiers who are pending referral to an MOS Medical Retention Board (MMRB) under Army Regulation 600–60 or referral to an MEB under Army Regulation 40–400 or PEB under Army Regulation 635–40 will not be denied promotion (if already promotable) on the basis of medical disqualification if they are otherwise qualified for promotion.


   b.  Per the provisions of 10 USC 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the retired list.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was on the FY13 promotion list for staff sergeant/E-6 at the time he was retired.  

2.  In accordance with the regulation in effect at the time the applicant should have been promoted to the higher rank effective the day before he was retired, 19 May 2013.

3.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to promote the applicant to staff sergeant/ E-6 with a date of rank and effective date of rank of 19 May 2013 and correct his DD Form 214 to reflect this promotion.  His retirement orders should also be amended.

BOARD VOTE:

_x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:  

	a.  promoting the applicant to staff sergeant/E-6 with a date of rank and effective date of rank of 19 May 2013; 

   b.  amending U.S. Army Installation Management Command Orders
059-1304, dated 28 February 2013, to show he was retired in the rank and grade of staff sergeant/E-6 and placed on the retired list in that rank and grade; and 


	c.  correcting his DD Form 214 to show the above rank and pay grade.



      _______ _ x  _______   ___
      	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011315



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011315



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015682

    Original file (20140015682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section III A (For each Soldier, regardless of condition) - he recommended retention of the applicant. Although he may have served in the rank of CPL at one time, the evidence of record does not show and he did not provide sufficient evidence that conclusively shows he was ever laterally appointed to the rank of CPL prior to placement on the TDRL. His unit commander stated on a DA Form 7652 that the applicant had been in a team position which would indicate the applicant was an acting CPL...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010364

    Original file (20130010364.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he was promoted beyond the rank and pay grade of private (PVT)/E-1 to specialist (SPC)/E-4. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. He was retired due to physical disability in the pay grade of PV1/E-1 on 27 June 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013155

    Original file (20130013155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on Retirement Physical Disability, Members of the Armed Forces), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the TDRL under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: * the grade or rank in which he is serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012645

    Original file (20130012645.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * medical document * DA Form 2807-1 (Report of Medical History) * DA Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination) * DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record – Enlisted) * permanent physical profiling memorandum * reassignment orders and revocation of reassignment orders * personal statement * Medical Report and Functional Capacity * Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) Process * Summary of Military Occupational Specialty (MOS)/Medical Retention Board (MMRB)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010454

    Original file (20090010454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010454 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was placed on the SFC/E-7 promotion list prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) on 19 July 2003. The applicant was in a promotable status on 18 July 2003 when he was retired and placed on the TDRL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008821

    Original file (20060008821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant continues that under the current Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) Soldiers are allowed to be promoted while injured and that paragraph 7-20f(3), states that the promotion criteria for Soldiers who are already promotable and pending a medical evaluation board (MEB) or a physical evaluation board (PEB) referral will not be denied promotion based on medical disqualification if they are otherwise qualified for promotion. The applicant provides copies...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007507

    Original file (20070007507.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that her promotion was not received upon retirement according to AR 600-8-19, that she did not receive her award until after she retired, and that there is no disability rating identified on her DD Form 214. Orders 05-122, dated 23 August 2006, issued by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri promoted the applicant from pay grade E-6 to pay grade E-7 with an effective date of rank of 23 August 2006. The evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004980

    Original file (20130004980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation of his mental health condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of his mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP recommended there be no change of the applicant's disability/permanent disability retirement determination.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992

    Original file (20130016992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023060

    Original file (20110023060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 7 June 2009 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 27 August 2009 * Orders 261-1314, dated 18 September 2009 * DA Form 199, dated 29 April 2011 * Orders D126-06, dated 6 May 2011 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 currently shows he was retired due to temporary...