Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011222
Original file (20130011222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  18 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011222 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he sustained during combat to his left leg when the roof of a building he was on caved in while under enemy fire.  His commander asked him if he wanted to be recommended for a Purple Heart but he was young and immature at the time [and he said no].

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), and Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 July 1966 and he held military occupational specialty 76Y (Supply Specialist).  He served in Vietnam while assigned as follows from:

* 26 January 1967 - 13 December 1967, 149th Military Intelligence (MI) Group
* 14 December 1967 - 10 December 1968, 525th MI Group

3.  The applicant provides an SF 600, wherein it shows he was treated on 6 March 1968 at the 3rd Field Hospital, Vietnam, when he fell and sustained a laceration to his left calf; debris was removed from the wound and it was drained.  On 8 March 1968, the wound was stitched and, on 16 March 1968, the sutures were removed.  

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on14 December 1968 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  He completed 2 years, 5 months, and 3 days of creditable active service.

5.  Neither the DD Form 214 nor the subsequent DD Form 215 he was issued shows the Purple Heart.  His record is void of orders for the Purple Heart.

6.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the Purple Heart.

7.  A review of the Adjutant General's Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing failed to show his name as a casualty.

8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The criteria for award of the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that a Soldier received a wound/injury as a result of hostile action, the wound/injury required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  Although the applicant may have received a laceration to his left leg while he was serving in Vietnam, the evidence of record does not show and he has not provided any evidence that shows this wound was incurred as a result of hostile action.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate he received a combat-related wound, and the SF Form 600 he provided does not show the wound he received was caused by hostile action.  

3.  Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis upon which to award the applicant the Purple Heart in this case.

4.  Nevertheless, this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case




are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011222





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011222



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006113C071029

    Original file (20070006113C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. This search also did not return any information to indicate the applicant was wounded in action on 19 September 1967 by a hostile enemy. On 13 August 2007, a request for a morning report search was made for any information showing the applicant was wounded and was sent to the hospital as a result of being wounded in action (WIA) by a hostile enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002809

    Original file (20090002809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart. There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001848

    Original file (20150001848 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was injured on his hand and foot * he served in Vietnam for 11 months and 24 days * he and his unit were attacked by the enemy again on 5 May 1968 * he was honorably discharged at his expiration term of service * his injuries are recorded in his military medical records, but they are not on his DD Form 214 * he was released from active duty (REFRAD) 26 days after the last attack 3. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004727

    Original file (20130004727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record is void of evidence that shows he was wounded in action or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. His service record is void of evidence which shows he was assigned to this unit in Vietnam and this entry does not include the date he sustained the injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005048

    Original file (20090005048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no entry in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. The statements of support provided by the applicant's former fellow Soldier were considered; however, the applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Listing and there were no entries made in his service records to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action. The SF 88 and 89 that were prepared at the time of the applicant's separation physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006922

    Original file (20140006922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and was wounded on his left foot, on 2 May 1968, by shrapnel from an incoming mortar and the medical treatment is recorded in his medical records. A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000697

    Original file (20100000697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An SF 509 shows the applicant received three sutures for a laceration on 5 March 1969. The applicant's DA Form 20 and the CMAC Form 35 do not show that the applicant was wounded and his name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for such wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004024

    Original file (20130004024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical record provided by the applicant shows he received a half-inch laceration to the left flank from a knife that was cleaned and sutured. While the applicant clearly sustained a knife wound while serving in Vietnam there is no documentation that the wound was the result of enemy action. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014356

    Original file (20110014356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete service medical record is not available to the Board for review. the SF 88 shows the entry "Fragment in eye, mortar explosion, S. Vietnam, 1968." The available documentation shows the applicant had a fragment in his eye.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020142

    Original file (20130020142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states: a. the applicant's medical records show he was treated for wounds received during a rocket attack during the night of 13 and/or 14 April 1969; b. that Army Regulation 600-8-2 states in: (1) paragraph 2-8f, "when contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The applicant submitted: a. a letter to HRC, dated 18 January 2013, requesting retroactive award of the Purple...