Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011193
Original file (20130011193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130011193 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Presidential Service Badge and Certificate be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 10 June 1965.

2.  The applicant states all awards should be noted on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 June 1962
* DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 June 1965
* Presidential Service Certificate Number 994, dated 1 September 1964
* a letter, dated 30 September 1964, from the White House

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 28 May 1960, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  On 11 June 1962, he immediately reenlisted for 3 years.

3.  While assigned to the 1st Student Enlisted Company at Fort Eustis, VA from 29 October 1962 - 23 January 1963 he received an efficiency rating of "Good (A)."  He had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during the remaining period from 28 May 1960 - 27 May 1963.

4.  He was promoted to specialist five on 19 August 1963.

5.  He was assigned to the 140th Transportation Detachment from 20 February 1963 - 23 January 1964 in the Republic of Vietnam.

6.  He provided his Presidential Service Certificate for honorable service in the White House, signed by President Lyndon B. Jonson on 1 September 1964.

7.  He provided a letter, dated 30 September 1964, signed by the Military Aide to the President of the United States awarding him the Presidential Service Badge and Certificate.  This award represented a period of service to the President of the United States for 1 year or longer subsequent to 20 January 1961.  A letter, dated 25 August 1965, from the Department of the Army, Office of the Adjutant General forwarded this award to his commanding officer for presentation.

8.  On 10 June 1965, he was released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the:

* Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

9.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Records do not show indiscipline or lost time.  

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  

	a.  During the period he was assigned to the 140th Transportation Detachment the unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) for the period April 1963 - February 1964.  

	b.  All units assigned in Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, based on Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974.  

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.

	a.  The National Defense Service Medal was awarded for honorable active service from 1 January 1961 - 14 August 1974.  

	b.  The Presidential Service Badge and the Presidential Service Certificate were established by Executive Order 11174, 1 September 1964 as amended by Executive Orders 11407, 23 April 1968; Executive Order 11520, 25 March 1970; 
and Executive Order 12793, 20 March 1992.  This award replaced the White House Service Badge and Certificate established by Executive Order 10879,
1 June 1960.  The certificate is awarded, in the name of the President by the Secretary of the Army, to members of the Army who have been assigned to the White House Office; to military units and support facilities under the administration of the White House Military Office or to other direct support positions with the Executive Office of the President (EOP).  The badge is awarded to those members of the Armed Forces who have been granted the Certificate and is awarded in the same manner in which the certificate is given.  Once the badge is awarded, it may be worn as a permanent part of the uniform.

	c.  The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  

12.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940.
The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

13.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations, Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated that all decorations, service medals, campaign credits, and badges awarded or authorized during the period covered by the DD Form 214 were included on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The letter, dated 30 September 1964, from the White House awarded him the Presidential Service Badge and Certificate.  Therefore, this award should be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  His records do not show indiscipline, lost time, or a record of courts-martial during the period from 28 May 1960 - 27 May 1963.  He received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings with the exception of one "good" academic efficiency rating during this period.  The "good" rating was given while attending a service school and therefore is not disqualifying.  Therefore, he is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of three years from 28 May 1960 - 27 May 1963.  

3.  He served honorably during a period of eligibility for the National Defense Service Medal.  Therefore, he is entitled to this award.

4.  Based on his service with the 140th Transportation Detachment he is authorized the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army).

5.  Based on his service in Vietnam he is authorized the:

* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period of service from  28 May 1960 - 27 May 1963; and

	b.  adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 June 1965:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award)
* Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) 
* National Defense Service Medal
* Presidential Service Badge and Certificate
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011193



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130011193



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010008

    Original file (20090010008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show awards of the Korea Defense Service Medal, the Valorous Unit Award, the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010870C070208

    Original file (20040010870C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carmen Duncan | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, a 30 September 1964 letter awarding him the Presidential Service Badge and Certificate, a copy of the Certificate, and his Honorable Discharge Certificate. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002188

    Original file (20080002188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's REFRAD provided for entering only awards earned during the period covered by the DD Form 214; however, the current version of the regulation states that all awards for all periods of service will be listed on the DD Form 214 in the priority sequence specified in the Army's awards regulation. Therefore, it would be appropriate to issue the applicant an HD Certificate based on his discharge date of 28 June 1968 at this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019236

    Original file (20100019236.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Presidential Unit Citation * Valorous Unit Award 2. The applicant states: * his service was honorable and exceptional yet he was not awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal because he took an early discharge from combat service in Vietnam * Army Regulation allows for the belated award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) established...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009849

    Original file (20110009849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for his service during the period 9 March 1955-31 March 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the: * Army Good Conduct Medal 3rd Award for the period 9 March 1955-8 March 1958 * Army Good Conduct Medal 4th Award for the period 9 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014159

    Original file (20140014159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant was authorized the AFEM for his service in the RVN and his records show he was awarded the service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010345

    Original file (20090010345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Presidential Unit Citation with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Vietnamese Unit Citation, the "Airborne and Air Assault Commemorative," and the "Overseas Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008975C080213

    Original file (20070008975C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 30 June 1972 be corrected to add the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, and five bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal. Except for one Article 15, which did not prevent his receiving the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, there is no evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005685

    Original file (20120005685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his second award of the Bronze Star Medal and award of the Meritorious Service Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Bronze Star Medal by official orders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020843

    Original file (20140020843.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * Page 1 of his 4-page DA Form 24 (Service Record) * U.S. Army Reserve Honorable Discharge Certificate * Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 34, dated 1966 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all...