Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008297
Original file (20130008297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  30 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008297 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, her pay grade be corrected to show E-4 on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 January 1980. 

2.  The applicant states:

* her pay grade is E-4
* she acquired a nursing degree in 1984
* her paperwork/request was not processed
* her request for military benefits and claims is pending
* she has a pending request for graduate school

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 29 August 1977.  She was ordered to active duty for training on 1 June 1979 and she was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 26 January 1980.

3.  Her DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 January 1980 shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) "PFC" (private first class)
* item 4b (Pay Grade) E-3
* item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) "79  06  01" (1 June 1979)

4.  Item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows she had attended college, but did not have a degree.

5.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of her DA Form 2-1 shows she was:

* appointed to PFC in the USAR with a date of rank of 1 June 1979
* appointed to specialist four (SPC)/E-4 in the USAR effective 3 May 1980 

6.  On 23 July 1985, she was honorably discharged from the USAR in pay grade E-4.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of her REFRAD.  Since she was appointed to pay grade E-4 in the USAR after her REFRAD, there is no basis for amending her pay grade on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 January 1980.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  __X______  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008297





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008297



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009853

    Original file (20060009853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 25 May 1985, that shows she was honorably REFRAD after completing 3 years of total active service. In support of her application, the applicant provides a DA Form 873 that shows, in pertinent part, she was granted a Secret security clearance on 23 May 1979; a DA Form 134 that shows she successfully completed 4 years of instruction in the Senior ROTC on 15 May 1981; 2 pages of a DA Form 2-1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000087

    Original file (20150000087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013615

    Original file (20080013615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows, in item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that the applicant was promoted to PFC effective 1 May 1980 and to SP4 effective 1 August 1981.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015833

    Original file (20080015833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 March 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015833 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that: a. her DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), with the period ending 16 June 1978, be corrected to show she entered the military under the delayed entry program (DEP); b. she be issued a DD Form 214 that shows her service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR); and c. her DD Form 214 show her promotion to the rank of sergeant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017346

    Original file (20130017346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and item 4b (Pay Grade) private first class (PFC)/E-3 * item 12b (Separation Date this Period) that she was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 15 July 2008 vice 13 July 2007 * item 12c (Net Active Service this Period) be corrected to show 1 year, 5 months, and 27 days of active duty service 2. The applicant states that she has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018224

    Original file (20110018224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she held the rank of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 from 1 June 1981 through the date of her release from active duty (REFRAD) and payment of all pay and allowances due as a result of the correction. In addition, records show she was REFRAD in grade E-2 with an effective date of pay grade of 27 April 1981 and the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026044

    Original file (20100026044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her earlier request for correction to item 18 (Remarks) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 11 June 1982 where it states, "1 day excess leave from 4 October 1981 to 5 October 1981." As new issues, she requests: a. in effect, correction of item 26 (Separation Code) of her 1982 DD Form 214 and award of a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) incentive under the Student Loan Repayment Program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029718

    Original file (20100029718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Overseas Service Ribbon and correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 November 1976 to show this award. He also requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active) for the period ending 16 November 1979 to show in: * Items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) the entry specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private first class...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012130

    Original file (20100012130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – master sergeant (MSG) or lieutenant colonel (LTC) * Item 4b (Pay Grade) – E8 or O5 * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – 21 Years and 9 Months * Item 12 (Record of Service) o section a. The applicant's DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 27 June 1979, shows she enlisted in the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001660

    Original file (20090001660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He claims he served his final 18 months as a PV1 without getting into any trouble, and he was told by his first sergeant (1SG) that his rank would show up in his pay (twice); however, it never did. Item 21 (Time Lost) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows he accrued a total of 33 days of time lost due to two separate periods of AWOL (18 November through 2 December 1979 and 2 through 13 October 1980. It further shows that he was reduced to PV1/E-1 as a result of a court-martial conviction on...