Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010147
Original file (20130010147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    20 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130010147 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the removal of a special court-martial order from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AHMRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or as an alternative, that it be transferred to the restricted section on his AMHRR.

2.  The applicant states he believes it to be unjust for the special court-martial order to remain in his AHMRR because it happened almost 10 years ago and its presence is restricting his ability to progress and may result in his separation under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP).  He goes on to state that since the incident he has done his best to be an outstanding Soldier, he has learned from his mistake, and he sees every day as an opportunity to give back to the profession that he almost lost.

3.  The applicant provides a three-page letter explaining his application, 11 third-party letters of support, copies of his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), the special court-martial order, Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports and awards.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 May 1999 for a period of     4 years, training as an administrative specialist and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed his training and was assigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

3.  He reenlisted on 25 October 2002 for a period of 6 years and a Targeted Selective Reenlistment Bonus (TSRB).

4.  On 24 November 2004 he was convicted pursuant to his pleas by a special court-martial convened at Fort Bragg of stealing mail matter and receiving stolen property.  He was sentenced to confinement for 90 days and reduction to the pay grade of E-1. 

5.  On 30 August 2006 he reenlisted for a period of 6 years and a selective reenlistment bonus.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 1 December 2005 and to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 March 2009.

6.  His records show that he has deployed on five occasions to Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq (twice), and Afghanistan.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (AMHRR Management) serves as the authority for filing of documents in the AMHRR.  It states, in pertinent part, that when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification, the court-martial order will be filed on the performance section of the AMHRR.  If all charges and specifications are dismissed or if all charges and approved findings are not guilty, the court-martial will be filed on the restricted section of the AMHRR.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that the special court-martial order should be removed from his official records because it serves to impede his career progression has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  There are no provisions for removing court-martial orders from official records and no provisions for filing a court-martial order in the restricted section of the AMHRR unless all findings are not guilty. 

3.  While the applicant has provided numerous letters of support that applaud his performance, there are no provisions to grant the relief he is requesting and to do so would afford him a benefit not afforded to other Soldiers who were convicted by a court-martial.

4.  Accordingly, there is no basis to grant the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010147





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130010147



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008025

    Original file (20120008025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The behavior for which he was investigated was a direct result of his PTSD. He provides: * Officer Record Brief * Battalion commander’s statement * DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)) * letter from Chief, Behavior Medicine Services * LOR * legal opinion on Article 15 appeal * Medical Statement * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015274

    Original file (20120015274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) and all documentation pertaining to the unit drug test results from his Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR). b. Disciplinary information filed on the restricted section of the AMHRR will be provided to Command Sergeant Major/Sergeant Major (CSM/SGM) promotion boards, U.S. c. Documents in the restricted section are those that must be permanently kept to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012229

    Original file (20130012229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DD Form 2329 (Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial), dated 20 March 2006, from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). The applicant contends that the DD Form 2329, dated 20 March 2006, should be removed from his AMHRR because it has served its purpose. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130002078 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130012229 5 ARMY BOARD FOR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021298

    Original file (20120021298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Counsel stated that if the CG decided to proceed with the reprimand, the applicant made the specific requests listed below: * File the reprimand locally and allow him to continue serving in the Special Forces community * If the CG determines more than local filing, direct the legal office in Afghanistan to provide the complete packet of evidence that allegedly supports the allegations of the reprimand * Direct the legal office in Afghanistan to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011203

    Original file (20130011203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, transfer of his summary court-martial proceedings to the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (currently known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR)). A review of his AMHRR in the Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) shows that the summary court-martial and all allied documents are filed in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013854

    Original file (20120013854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his DD Form 2329 (Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial) to the restricted portion of his Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR). The applicant provides a letter of recommendation from his immediate commander to transfer the DD Form 2329 to the applicant's restricted portion of the AMHRR. Depending on the purpose, documents will be filed in the AMHRR in one of three sections: performance, service, or restricted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018514

    Original file (20130018514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of an Article 15, dated 3 October 2012, from his personnel records and restoration of his previous rank of staff sergeant (SSG), pay grade E-6. The applicant provides: * Enlisted Record Brief * DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)) * Notification of Administrative Separation Hearing memorandum * Summary of Proceedings * Separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022205

    Original file (20130022205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 July 2007, the applicant was reprimanded via GOMOR from the Commanding General (CG), Headquarters, U.S. Army Special Forces Command (Airborne) Fort Bragg, NC. On 6 December 2007, the CG directed the GOMOR be filed in the applicant's AMHRR. Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) provides, in pertinent part, that an administrative memorandum of reprimand may be issued by an individual's commander, by superiors in the chain of command, and by any general officer or officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019847

    Original file (20120019847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)), dated 19 February 2009, that is filed in the restricted section of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states that the intended purpose of the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) has been served and the commander who imposed it supports his effort to have the NJP removed from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007968

    Original file (20130007968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's records as follows: * set aside the punishment imposed by Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 22 February 2011 * removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) from the performance section of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * retroactive promotion to sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 2. COL RHL alleged the applicant was AWOL from his unit from 23 November 2010 until 19 January 2011, in...