Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009888
Original file (20130009888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  20 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009888 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests termination of recoupment of his reenlistment bonus. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he extended his enlistment for 6 years on 8 February 2007 for a $15,000 reenlistment bonus and on 2 June 2010 he transferred to the inactive guard (ING).  He goes on to state that the military tried to transfer him out of the ING but could not do so because he was in the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) process.  As a result he has been denied his payment of his bonus and recoupment action has been initiated in the amount of $8,750.00.

3.  The applicant provides copies of letters from the applicant, line of duty determination and documents from the Social Security Administration.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was serving in the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG) in the pay grade of E-6 when he extended his enlistment on 8 February 2007 for a period of 6 years and a $15,000 reenlistment bonus.  He acknowledged that he understood that his bonus would be recouped if he separated from the Army National Guard for any reason unless due to health, injury, illness or other impairments not the result of his own misconduct.

3.  He was transferred to the ING on 2 June 2010 for personal reasons and remained in the ING until 29 June 2012, which exceeded the 1 year limit for personal reasons and caused action to be initiated to terminate and recoup his bonus.

4.  On 13 August 2011 he was found medically disqualified for duty and was recommended for discharge from the KYARNG.  In 2012 he was found unfit for duty.

5.   In December 2012, a request for an exception to policy was submitted and was subsequently denied by the National Guard Bureau (NGB).

6.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the KYARNG on 9 October 2013 due to medical, Physical and Mental Conditions. 

7.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB which opines that based on the documentation provided, the applicant’s request for an exception to policy has been reevaluated and approved and recoupment will not be sought and any unpaid portion of the bonus will be paid.  Officials at the NGB go on to state that in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction 1205.21 recoupment is not required when discharge is due to an injury, illness or other impairment not the result of the member’s own misconduct.  Additionally, Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7, chapter 2, Table 1, Rule 2 provides that if a member under a written agreement incurs an injury or illness through no misconduct of the member, that precludes the member from fulfilling the service conditions specified in his written agreement, and the member is separated or retired for disability, repayment of the unearned portion of the pay will not be sought and is such separation or retirement for a disability was incurred in the line of duty in a designated combat zone, any unpaid portion of the bonus will be paid to the member upon separation.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and to date no response has been received by the staff of the Board.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted and appear to have merit.  His bonus was terminated and recoupment action was improperly initiated against the applicant because his condition was through no fault of his own.

2.  Additionally, officials at the NGB opine that recoupment action should be stopped and that he should be paid the remainder of his bonus given the circumstances of his case. 

3.  The Board concurs with the opinion of NGB officials and supports the opinion that recoupment action be stopped and that the applicant be paid the remainder of his bonus.

BOARD VOTE:

__x______  __x______  __x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by terminating recoupment action related to his reenlistment bonus and that any unpaid portion of the bonus be paid to the applicant.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009888





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009888



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011946

    Original file (20130011946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 October 2011, he submitted a memorandum, through his commander, to the State Adjutant General, requesting a transfer to the ING. An NGB official stated the applicant's request to retain a $15,000 reenlistment bonus for his reenlistment on 20 February 2008 could not be supported because he had exceeded the authorized period of non-availability in the ING and had failed to extend/reenlist for the period of non-availability within the required time. However, his ETP denial indicates...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014780

    Original file (20120014780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He enlisted in November 2008 for a period of 6 years in exchange for a $15,000 enlistment bonus * He returned home from deployment in 2010 to find he no longer was employed due to the collapse of the housing market * He requested to transfer to an Inactive National Guard (ING) status to pursue the only employment opportunity available to him as a DOD contractor * His chain of command approved his request without explaining to him the impact on his bonus * Had he known...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011280

    Original file (20130011280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he is entitled to the Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) he contracted for at the time of his enlistment in the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG). The advisory official recommended granting the applicant administrative relief and cancellation of his recoupment action, citing the following points: * the applicant contracted for a $20,000.00 NPSEB when he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002767

    Original file (20140002767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain a USAREC Form 1166, dated 11 August 2009, which shows he contracted for SELRES Special Pay in the amount of $20,000 annually for a period of 3 years, ending on 10 August 2012. The ARNG, Personnel Policy Division stated the applicant had already been paid $30,000 of the $45,000 total from the amended contract he signed in September 2013 and that there was no evidence to show the 66P special pay amount was reduced from $20,000 to $15,000. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011483

    Original file (20140011483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's OMPF and ARNG record contains enlistment/reenlistment/ extension documents which indicate the following: a. DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 16 October 2008, shows he extended his 17 December 2005 enlistment for 1 year making his new expiration term of service (ETS) date 16 December 2009. b. A Guard Incentive Management System computer print-out that includes the following information which shows a contract was executed authorizing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018437

    Original file (20130018437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His enlistment contract provides the following: a. a service obligation of 6 years service in a troop program unit (TPU) with 2 additional years as a member of the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR); b. training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 74D, Chemical Operations Specialist; c. participation in the Montgomery GI Bill with the Montgomery GI Bill Kicker; d. entitlement to a $15,000 critical skill enlistment bonus; e. entitlement to a $5,000 off-peak bonus; f. entitlement to a total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018409

    Original file (20130018409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, as an exception to policy, relief of recoupment of his Reenlistment/Extension Bonus (REB). He reenlisted in the SCARNG for 6 years on 23 September 2005. In Section V of the NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E – Termination, the applicant acknowledged that he understood he would be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment if he failed to extend within 30 days of his return to active status for any time served in the ING.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007178

    Original file (20140007178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It appears he submitted an exception to policy requesting no recoupment action be associated with his incentive termination: a. Additionally, the NGB Form 594-1 he signed clearly states his bonus will not be recouped based on contracting for the SMP. His bonus addendum stipulated that his bonus would be terminated without recoupment in the event he becomes a participant in the SMP/ROTC advanced course or receives an ROTC scholarship and has served more than 1-year of the enlisted incentive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008773

    Original file (20130008773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be allowed to retain the prior service enlistment bonus (PSEB) he received for his enlistment in the California Army National Guard (CAARNG). The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States), dated 24 January 2006 * NGB Form 600-7-6-R-E, dated 24 January 2006 * Joint Force Headquarters CAARNG Orders 8-1058, dated 8 January 2007 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. This amount will be determined by dividing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017645

    Original file (20140017645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also referred to DOD FMR, page 9-20, paragraph 0905, dated March 2006 (in effect at the time the applicant signed his contract) that stated: "hardship and dependency separations are considered involuntary and do not require recoupment of unearned portions of bonus." The IAARNG terminated the REB incentive with recoupment. National Guard Regulation 614-1 (Inactive Army National Guard) prescribes rules for use of the ING, enlistment into the ING as part of the Recruit Force Pool (RFP),...