Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014780
Original file (20120014780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    11 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120014780 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, the recoupment action of his $15,000 extension/reenlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG) bonus be stopped and he be paid the bonus.   

2.  The applicant states:

* He enlisted in November 2008 for a period of 6 years in exchange for a $15,000 enlistment bonus
* He returned home from deployment in 2010 to find he no longer was employed due to the collapse of the housing market
* He requested to transfer to an Inactive National Guard (ING) status to pursue the only employment opportunity available to him as a DOD contractor
* His chain of command approved his request without explaining to him the impact on his bonus
* Had he known recoupment action would start if he transferred to an ING status, he would have chosen a different approach
* The bonus recoupment is negatively affecting his family's financial readiness

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement)
* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document)
* DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment)
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-3-R-E (Anne R to DD Form 4 or DA Form 4836 Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum - ARNG)
* Request for an exception to policy and denial letter from the NGB
* Orders 091-912 (transfer to ING)
* Notification of recoupment action
* Request for Transfer to Active ARNG Status from the ING
* Orders 009-905 (transfer from ING)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Washington ARNG (WAARNG) for a period of 8 years on 28 February 2003 and he was trained in and held military occupational specialty (MOS) 21B (Combat Engineer). 

2.  He entered active duty on 8 March 2004 and subsequently served in Kuwait/Iraq for a period of 9 months and 27 days.  He was honorably released from active duty on 1 May 2005 to the control of the state. 

3.  On 18 August 2008, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He served in Iraq from 25 October 2008 to 9 November 2009.  

4.  On 18 November 2008, while in Iraq, he executed a 6-year extension in the ARNG.  In connection with this extension, he completed Annex R wherein he acknowledged he understood:  

* He was reenlisting or extending in a critical unit identification code (UIC) and/or critical skill
* Upon his extension or reenlistment in the ARNG, he was eligible to receive a reenlistment or extension bonus under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP), if otherwise qualified
* He would receive a $15,000 bonus in exchange for his 6-year extension/reenlistment
* His bonus would be recouped if he failed to extend his enlistment for the period served in the ING within 30 days after returning to his unit - recoupment would be calculated from the effective date of transfer to the ING
* His bonus would also be recouped if he exceeded the maximum time authorized in the ING
* He had read his contract and understood its contents

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 21 January 2010 to the control of his state.

6.  In March 2010, he requested to be transferred to the ING.  Accordingly, on 1 April 2010, the WAARNG published Orders 091-912 transferring him to the ING effective 29 March 2010 per his individual request.  

7.  On 5 December 2011, by memorandum, the State Incentive Manager notified him that a discrepancy existed in his bonus eligibility.  He had extended for 6 years but failed to return from the ING to a drilling status within 12 months.  As such, the amount of $12,291.67 would be recouped.  He was advised of the option to submit an exception to policy if he felt there was an error in the recoupment action.

8.  In January 2012, he requested a return to drilling status from the ING.  Accordingly, the WAARNG published Orders 009-905 transferring him from the ING to a drilling status with Company C, 81st Brigade Special Troop Battalion. 

9.  On 10 January 2012, he submitted an exception to policy request regarding the bonus, detailing the challenges he faced upon returning from deployment.  

10.  On 1 February 2012, the NGB denied his request and ordered his bonus terminated with recoupment.  The NGB official stated the applicant failed to return from ING status within 12 months for personal reasons and he failed to extend his ARNG contract within 30 days of return to drilling status. 

11.  On 29 February 2012, an official at the Recruiting and Retention Battalion, of the WAARNG reiterated the position that the bonus would be denied and recoupment action started because of the reasons stated in the NGB's denial letter. 

12.  He submitted a sworn statement wherein he states that he requested a transfer to the ING to pursue the only employment option available to him - a DOD contractor - after the housing market collapse.  His chain of command approved his request without explaining he would be breaching his contract or the consequences of his own actions.  The recoupment would create a financial hardship to him and his family.  He has given the ARNG everything and he would continue to do so. 

13.  ARNG Selective Reserve Incentive Program Policy Number 07-06, dated
10 August 2007, states in paragraph 14 that if an entitlement to an incentive is terminated for any reason before the fulfillment of the service described in the member's written agreement, that member shall not be eligible to receive any further incentive payments except for payments of service performed before the termination date.

14.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Incentive Programs) states the prior service enlistment bonus incentive offers a cash bonus to eligible persons with prior military service who enlist in the Selected Reserve in a designated MOS announced by Headquarters, Department of the Army.  A cash bonus is offered to any person who meets certain requirements.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant extended his enlistment contract with the WAARNG for a period of 6 years on 18 November 2008, while in Iraq, in exchange for a $15,000 bonus.  However, shortly upon demobilization in March 2010, he requested a transfer to the ING for personal reasons.  

2.  He remained in the ING from 29 March 2010 to 5 January 2012, a period that exceeded 12 months.  Since he did not return from an ING status after 12 months, he violated the contractual agreement he had with the WAARNG.  He had agreed upon extending that his bonus would be terminated with recoupment action if he did so.  

3.  He agreed to serve at least 6 years in a paid drill status, for a critical UIC and MOS which has been identified as a $15,000 critical MOS.  He acknowledged he understood the circumstances upon which is bonus would be recouped.  Since he did not complete his required 6 years in a paid drill status, the unearned portion of his bonus was recouped.  The negative impact that this recoupment action has left is regrettable.  However, this is a natural result of his own actions and a personal choice that he made.  There is neither an error nor an injustice.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120014780





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120014780



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016383

    Original file (20140016383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * Self-authored statement * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * Memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for REB, [Applicant], dated 5 September 2012 * Memorandum, subject: Notification of Incentive Discrepancy and ETP Process, dated 25 June 2012 * Email CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) or DA Form 4836 (Oath of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013373

    Original file (20130013373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An NGB Form 600-7-3-R, dated 18 March 2006, shows in Section III (Bonus Amount and Payments) the applicant extended his enlisted for a $15,000.00 bonus. His discharge orders, as amended, show his bonus was terminated with recoupment effective 1 June 2010, the date he was discharged. As such, his State requested a recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonuses.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017645

    Original file (20140017645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also referred to DOD FMR, page 9-20, paragraph 0905, dated March 2006 (in effect at the time the applicant signed his contract) that stated: "hardship and dependency separations are considered involuntary and do not require recoupment of unearned portions of bonus." The IAARNG terminated the REB incentive with recoupment. National Guard Regulation 614-1 (Inactive Army National Guard) prescribes rules for use of the ING, enlistment into the ING as part of the Recruit Force Pool (RFP),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005546

    Original file (20120005546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In order to complete the mission obligation, his commander transferred him to the ING. c. Annex E (Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum) shows in: (1) section II (Eligibility): the applicant understood he was eligible for an NPSEB; (2) section III (Payments): he would receive a total bonus of $20,000 for the enlistment bonus option, less taxes, and: (a) he would receive his first bonus payment of 50% of the total authorized amount, less taxes, when he completed Initial Active Duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020719

    Original file (20130020719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His bonus addendum clearly informed him and he acknowledged he understood he would be suspended from bonus eligibility if he entered a period of non-availability (placement in the ING); maximum periods of non-availability are 1 year for personal reasons; his bonus would be terminated if he failed to extend his enlistment for time served in the ING within 30 days after returning to his unit; recoupment would be calculated from the date of transfer to the ING; and/or his bonus would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018107

    Original file (20140018107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in order of submission: * DA Form 4836, dated 15 April 2007 * page 2 of his NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) or DA Form 4836 – REB Addendum – ARNG of the United States) (14 December 2004) * CAARNG memorandum, dated 19 August 2012, subject: Request for Documentation Supporting Your Incentive(s) * U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Plea Agreement for former CAARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019398

    Original file (20130019398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019398 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308i (Special pay: PSEB) provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is a former enlisted member of an Armed Force who enlists in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of an Armed Force for a period of 3 or 6 years in a critical military skill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003316

    Original file (20140003316 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s REB was cancelled and recoupment directed because the applicant was in the ING for a period of 2 years and because he did not extend his enlistment to make up the 2 years within 30 days of returning to active status. Although his Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum implied, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was informed at the time of his second extension in the ING that his incentive eligibility would terminate as a result of the second...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016019

    Original file (20130016019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section V (Termination) of his NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E states, "I understand I will be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment if I: * Fail to extend my enlistment for time served in the ING within 30 days after return to my unit; recoupment is required from the effective date of transfer to the ING * Exceed the maximum time in the ING; recoupment is required from the date of transfer into the ING" 4. Orders 291-037, dated 18 October 2007, show he was released from Support Company,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140004957

    Original file (AR20140004957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from recoupment of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) in the amount of $10,000. IDARNG, MFR, dated 8 September 2012, shows the Commander, Charlie Company, 116th BSTB, stated: a. IDARNG unit officials received an email from the G1, Education and Incentives, dated 21 August 2012, asking if the applicant had reenlisted within the 30-day limit after his return from the ING; b. after contacting the applicant, it was identified he did not sign an...