Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009451
Original file (20130009451.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009451 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He wants to reinstate SBP coverage for his former spouse because he is legally obligated to provide her this coverage as part of his support settlement.  Upon their divorce settlement, he paid for SBP and deducted it from her payment through an allotment.  On 2 January 2013, he requested that she receive SBP as part of the divorce settlement and that she be billed directly for SBP.  He received a letter, dated 28 January 2013, stating that his request for her payment was denied and his SBP request would be forwarded to the Office of Military Retired Pay.

	b.  If he had been informed of the 12-month requirement at that time he would have had enough time to submit the required paperwork.  He received notification on 13 May 2013 that his SBP coverage was cancelled and his payments were reimbursed.  His former spouse now has no coverage upon his death when she is legally entitled. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Divorce documentation
* Consent Order
* Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) letter, dated 28 January 2013
* Retiree Account Statements
 
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant married Leticia on 28 October 1983.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 January 1985.  

2.  His DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 
19 December 2005, shows he enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage, full base amount.

3.  He retired in the rank of sergeant major on 31 March 2006 after completing over 21 years of active service.

4.  He and Leticia divorced on 31 January 2012.  Their Consent Order states "The Defendant (applicant) shall pay the amount due for the Survivor Benefit Plan until the parties' son, John Nicholas Rxxx, completes his graduate program or elects to discontinue his graduate program.  Plaintiff (Leticia) shall thereafter make the payment for the Survivor Benefit Plan."

5.  He provides a letter, dated 2 January 2013, to DFAS requesting his former spouse be billed directly for SBP payments because their son discontinued his graduate studies in 2010.  On 28 January 2013, DFAS responded and stated his request could not be processed because a former spouse must make application for her payments, the retired member cannot initiate payments.  He was informed his SBP request would be forwarded to the Office of Military Retired Pay.

6.  The applicant married Dina on 13 April 2013.

7.  He provides a copy of his Retiree Account Statement, dated 31 May 2013, which shows no SBP election was reflected on his account.

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

9.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), enacted 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

10.  Public Law 98-94, enacted 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage.

2.  Although there is no evidence to show that he requested his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the statutory 1-year time limit, it appears it was his intention to provide the SBP annuity to the applicant as required by the terms of their divorce settlement (Consent Order).  Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he requested SBP coverage for his former spouse in a timely manner.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION










BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant made a written request to change his SBP coverage to former spouse on 1 March 2012 and the request was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009451



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009451



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009877C070208

    Original file (20040009877C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003201

    Original file (20150003201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the FSM elected SBP at retirement and he also elected to continue SBP coverage for her during their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006822

    Original file (20090006822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage in conjunction with his divorce. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: self-authored statement; letter of support, DD Form 2656-1 (Survivor Benefit Election (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), Decree of Divorce , and Separation Agreement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019539

    Original file (20140019539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 September 2013, by letter, DFAS responded to the applicant that a review of the FSM's retired pay account reflected the FSM did not elect former spouse SBP coverage and although the divorce decree stated she must deem the election, there is no evidence she did so. On 27 January 2014, by letter, DFAS explained that in order for the former spouse to be eligible for the SBP annuity, the member would have to request in writing to change the SBP election from spouse to former spouse or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024111

    Original file (20110024111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 July 1977, the applicant and FSM completed a settlement agreement in the Superior Court for the County of Whitfield and State of Georgia which stipulated, in pertinent part, that the FSM currently made payments on an annuity contract (SBP) whereby a percentage of his monthly retirement pay from the United States Government would continue at his death unto the applicant and the minor children of the marriage. In view of the foregoing and given there is no current spouse beneficiary, it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015756

    Original file (20130015756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests correction of the record of the applicant's former spouse, a retired service member (SM), to show a deemed election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. No timely deemed election of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104787C070208

    Original file (2004104787C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that her mother (the FSM's former spouse) was married to the FSM for most of his military career. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011972

    Original file (20140011972.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show a deemed election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). (4) If her divorce decree specifies that she was to be designated as a former spouse beneficiary for the SBP, she must take action to make a "deemed election for SBP" coverage within 1 year of the date of divorce or other court order requiring SBP coverage for her directly to the Retired Pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020298

    Original file (20130020298.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests, in effect, that the records of the deceased FSM be corrected to show he changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage or as an alternative, that his records be corrected to show the applicant made a timely former spouse election. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019607

    Original file (20100019607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM died on 24 August 2008 and she began receiving SBP payments the next month and this continued until January 2009. He and the applicant were divorced on 9 January 1997. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within one year of their divorce in February 1997; b. showing his request was timely received and processed by the...