IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 7 April 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019607
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
The applicant requests reinstatement of her benefits under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as a former spouse and reimbursement of monthly payments since December 2008.
2. She states her SBP was erroneously discontinued in December 2008 due to the Department of Defense (DoD) misplacing and misunderstanding the conditions of their divorce. The records need to be located or corrected to reflect that her late former spouse, a former service member (FSM), and her divorce settlement stipulated she was to receive upon his death all of his SBP benefits until her death.
3. She also states she and the FSM were married for 30 years during which time he served on active duty for 23 years until he retired in 1990. Unfortunately, they divorced in 1997. As a condition of their divorce settlement it was stipulated that on his death she was to receive his SBP until her death. This was something the FSM was in total agreement with. The FSM died on 24 August 2008 and she began receiving SBP payments the next month and this continued until January 2009. For reasons unknown to her the monthly payments ceased with the December 2008 payment. She had been in contact with DoD since January 2009 attempting to determine why the monthly payments stopped in December 2008. Her last letter to DoD, dated 10 June 2009, was answered on 3 June 2010.
4. She provides:
* Waiver of Citation and Final Decree of Divorce, both dated 9 January 1997
* the FSMs State of Texas Certificate of Death
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The FSM and the applicant were married on 17 April 1967.
2. The FSM's military records show that with prior enlisted service, he was commissioned in the Regular Army on 29 June 1976. He served continuously on active duty until he was honorably retired for length of service on 30 September 1990 in the rank of major (MAJ). He apparently elected to participate in the SBP for spouse only coverage at that time.
3. On 7 January 1997, the FSM submitted a waiver of citation to the District Court. He and the applicant were granted a divorce on 9 January 1997. The decree ordered the FSM to maintain SBP coverage for the applicant until her death.
4. There is no evidence that shows a deemed election was filed for the SBP within 1 year of the date of the Court Order.
5. The FSM died on 24 August 2008. His death certificate shows his marital status as "divorced."
6. On 9 February 2011, a staff member of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), Retired Pay, Cleveland, OH, verified that their office had received an application for annuity from the applicant, but they could not process the application because a former spouse SBP election was never deemed. On 3 March 2011, the staff member further advised that their office did not have a copy of the FSM's original election on record and no SBP annuity had ever been paid. DFAS also verified the FSM paid SBP spouse only premiums from the time of his retirement to the time of his death.
7. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
8. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.
9. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former military spouses of retired members and reservists.
10. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.
11. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.
2. The evidence of record shows the FSM was retired on 30 September 1990. He and the applicant were divorced on 9 January 1997. The decree stipulated the FSM would maintain SBP coverage for the applicant until her death. The FSM died on 24 August 2008.
3. There is no evidence that the applicant submitted a request for a deemed election of former spouse coverage to DFAS within 1 year of divorce nor is there any evidence the FSM made a voluntary change from spouse to former spouse coverage. However, DFAS verified the FSM paid SBP spouse only premiums from the time of his retirement to the time of his death and no one is currently receiving the annuity.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, and since there is no widow with a superior vested interest to defect the applicant's equitable interest, it would now be appropriate, as a matter of fairness and equity, to correct the FSM's records to show he requested an SBP change to former spouse coverage within 1 year of his divorce from the applicant.
5. In view of the foregoing, the FSMs records should be corrected as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ___X____ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within one year of their divorce in February 1997;
b. showing his request was timely received and processed by the appropriate DFAS office; and
c. paying the applicant the SBP annuity retroactive to the day after the FSM's death.
__________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100019607
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100019607
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013785
The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show a former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election was submitted and approved within one year of their divorce. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000166
Records show that, upon retirement from the Army, the FSM elected SBP with spouse coverage. The evidence of record indicates the FSM maintained SBP spouse coverage following his divorce from the applicant and through his date of death. d. Assuming the divorce required the FSM to maintain SBP coverage, the evidence of record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM's SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of the divorce.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001548
The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be provided an annuity under the FSMs Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001441
The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests reconsideration of her previous request for correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity election from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce. In their response, DFAS made the following points: * the FSM originally elected SBP coverage for his spouse * upon their Judgment of Divorce, dated 6 February 1997, the applicant lost her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010076
The evidence of record shows that the FSM, while still married to the applicant, elected SBP spouse coverage at a reduced amount, prior to his retirement. After retirement, he and the applicant were divorced. Their divorce decree did not obligate the FSM to change SBP coverage from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage; nevertheless, he continued to pay SBP premiums after the divorce and until his death, a period of nearly 5 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022211
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Even though the FSM continued to pay the SBP premiums neither the applicant nor the FSM made a deemed election for former spouse coverage within one year of the divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010653C080407
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage election made by her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to "Former Spouse", and that she be provided a SBP annuity based on the death of the FSM. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant and the FSM were divorced on 5 August 1997, and that the FSM submitted a SBP election change to "Former Spouse" in December 1997, within a year of the divorce, as directed in the divorce...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001313
The applicant states that she was married to the FSM for 25 years, 18 of which were during his military service and that upon his retirement, he elected spouse coverage under the SBP. The applicant contends that the records of her former spouse should be corrected to show that her request for a deemed election of former spouse coverage under the SBP was timely received and properly processed by officials at DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011434
The applicant, a former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests change of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse coverage and payment of the SBP annuity. His service record is void of evidence that indicates the FSM made a voluntary election or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce. e. On 17 July 2009, the applicant contacted DFAS again in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000247
The applicant and Executrix of the FSM's estate contend the FSM's records should be corrected to show he participated in the SBP with former spouse coverage because the final judgment of the divorce decree awarded the applicant the FSM's SBP as a former spouse and the FSM attempted to notify DFAS of this on several occasions. d. Thus, the evidence of record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM's SBP election from spouse to former spouse...