Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009445
Original file (20130009445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009445 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his
DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show sergeant (SGT) instead of specialist five (SP5).

2.  The applicant states he was serving as an acting SGT and displayed SGT stripes prior to his promotion to pay grade E-5.  He was a platoon SGT and fill-in noncommissioned officer (NCO).

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 January 1969.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (field wireman).  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to SP5, pay grade E-5, on 9 June 1971.  His promotion orders are not available.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 20 November 1971 and was transferred the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  His DD Form 214 lists in:

* Item 5a – SP5
* Item 5b (Pay Grade) – E-5
* Item 6 (Date of Rank) – 9 June 1971

4.  The applicant’s release from active duty orders show his rank as SP5, his DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) shows his rank as SP5, and his USAR discharge orders show his rank as SP5.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provided instructions for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated that items 5a, 5b, and 6 would list the rank, pay grade, and effective date of pay grade for the current pay grade.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant’s promotion orders are not available, all the available evidence shows he was promoted to SP5, not SGT.  He may have been an acting SGT while he was an E-4 and even while an E-5; however, he provides no evidence to show his actual rank was SGT.

2.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary it appears that item 5a of the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to correct item 5a of his DD Form 214 to show his rank as SGT.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009445



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009445



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012191

    Original file (20100012191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that his rank at his time of separation from active duty was SGT not SP5 as shown on his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 5 October 1971. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was promoted to the rank of SGT on 8 February 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020607

    Original file (20130020607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) to show the rank of specialist five (SP5) * Item 5b (Pay Grade) to show pay grade E-5 2. The regulation states items 5a and 5b would list the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and item 6 would list the effective date for the grade shown in items 5a and 5b. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010796

    Original file (20120010796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 February 1969 in the rank/grade of private/E-1. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 24 February 1971, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000641

    Original file (20130000641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was separated in the rank of SGT/E-5 because he assumed an NCOIC position and the individual he replaced held the rank of SGT. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was appointed or promoted to the rank of SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023091

    Original file (20110023091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2495 (Disposition Form), dated 10 August 1971, subject: 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Standing List, with Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel to Pay Grade E-5 * Special Orders Number 277, U.S. Army Flight Training Center and Fort Stewart, Fort Stewart, GA, dated 13 October 1971 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He appeared before the 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Board on 5 August 1971 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009240

    Original file (20130009240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains the following documents, dated 4 November 1971, which show his rank as SP5: * DA Form 664 (Serviceman's Statement Concerning Application for Compensation from the Veterans Administration) * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 3032-R (Statement of Medical Condition) 8. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003672

    Original file (20130003672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of items 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), 5b (Pay Grade), and 6 (Date of Rank (DOR)) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant states: * His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a specialist four/E-4 when in fact he was a specialist five (SP5)/E-5 * He was promoted to SP5 while serving in Korea in early 1971 3. The separation orders and personal effects shipment notice provided by the applicant that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017258

    Original file (20130017258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was placed on the promotion list before his separation. On 4 August 1971, Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, published Special Orders Number 216 releasing him from active duty effective 4 August 1971. Absent the publication of the promotion instrument - a promotion order - there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009114

    Original file (20090009114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record show the applicant's rank at the time of his discharge was SP4. In the absence of promotion orders to SP5, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a and 5b on his DD Form 214. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015721C071029

    Original file (20060015721C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Jeffrey C. Redmann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SP5 on 3 August 1971, shortly before his release from active duty, as evidenced by the promotion orders provided by the applicant, and the separation orders on file in his record. Although Items 5a, 5b and 5c of his DD Form 214 appear to be blank and his USAR discharge orders list his rank as...