Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009113
Original file (20130009113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:   30 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130009113 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Reports of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal with oak leaf cluster.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he earned the Air Medal for having over 52 hours of flight time in resupply missions and being medically evacuated out of An Khê, Vietnam, in 1969.  He has been diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (commonly known as ALS) and has started putting his affairs in order for his children.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Following prior service in the Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 April 1968.  He initially held military occupational specialty (MOS) 13F (Fire Support Specialist).  He subsequently reclassified to MOS 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist) and reenlisted.

3.  He served in Vietnam as an air defense artilleryman from 21 November 1968 to on or about 25 June 1969 when he was medically evacuated to Camp Zama, Japan.  He returned to Vietnam and served as a unit armorer/supply sergeant from 12 March 1970 to on or about 9 January 1971.

4.  He was medically retired on 26 February 1979 in the rank/grade of staff sergeant/E-6.  He completed 20 years, 9 months, and 28 days of active duty service.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Air Medal.

5.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) do not show the Air Medal.

6.  There are no available orders in the applicant's records showing he was awarded the Air Medal.  There are no records available to show he was on flight status or flew any missions.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam-era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Air Medal pertaining to the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Air Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example, personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

9.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal.  It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an Air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations.  It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours.  Twenty-five category I missions (air assault and equally-dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in category I missions were the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the Air Medal.  However, the regulation was clear these guidelines were considered only a departure point.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no available orders showing he was awarded the Air Medal.  The governing regulation requires a formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders for award of the Air Medal.  In the absence of orders or other independent evidence that would confirm he completed the number of missions necessary to be awarded the Air Medal, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Air Medal in this case.

2.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120008487



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130009113



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015717

    Original file (20140015717.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he believes the Air Medal was requested around April 1971 but he never received it * he tried to correct his records in 1974 but again did not receive the award * in August 1974 he contacted the former Operations Officer for the unit with which he served in Vietnam; the Operations Officer had submitted the recommendation for the applicant's Air Medal * the Operations Officer provided a statement affirming the applicant's Air Medal had been requested * he is a life...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019281

    Original file (20130019281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During his service in Vietnam, the applicant completed various combat missions. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Air Medal (38th Award) for meritorious achievement while participating in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008511

    Original file (20080008511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records do not contain general orders awarding him the Air Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Air Medal with Numeral 8 for participating in aerial flight in the Republic of Vietnam from January 1971 to December 1971; and b. showing award of the Air Medal (Numeral 8), the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005189

    Original file (20090005189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he located the orders that awarded him the Bronze Star Medal and his flight record that shows he completed 240 hours of combat flying time by 30 June 1969 which should qualify him for additional oak leaf clusters for his Air Medal. Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, General Orders Number 12870, dated 9 October 1969, show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from 1 December 1968 to 31 July 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. To...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012094

    Original file (20110012094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or citations in his records awarding him the Air Medal with 43 OLC's or evidence of record that supports his request for those awards during his period of service. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. There is no evidence of record and no sufficient evidence was provided by the applicant to show he completed a minimum of 25 category I missions, 50 category II missions, or 100 category III missions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015675

    Original file (20060015675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows that the U.S. Army Reserve Component Personnel Administration Command, St. Louis, Missouri, authorized and issued the following awards to the applicant: Air Medal; Meritorious Unit Commendation with 1 Oak Leaf Cluster; National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars; Combat Medical Badge; Army Aviator Badge; Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle, Rifle, and Pistol Bars; Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024572

    Original file (20110024572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records do not contain official orders awarding him the Aircraft Crewmember Badge or any additional awards of the Air Medal. USARV Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the award of the Aircraft Crewmember Badge and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002134

    Original file (20120002134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate - Army) * DA Form 759-1 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate - Army) * Special Orders (SO) Number 309 (flying status) * Record of Flying Time * Breakdown of awards of what appear to be the Air Medal CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. During his service in Vietnam, he completed various combat missions. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008043

    Original file (20110008043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His official military personnel file does not contain any flight records or orders for award of the Air Medal. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. However, there is no corroborating evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file or in ADCARS that shows he was awarded the Air Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014791

    Original file (20110014791.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He contends he has proof of combat flight hours while serving with the 121st Assault Helicopter Company from 17 August through 2 December 1967, and also has a copy of the orders which show he was authorized to add the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar to his DD Form 214. Item 24 of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or is authorized the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Air Medal, the Aircraft Crewman Badge, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship...