Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008713
Original file (20130008713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    4 February 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008713 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service during the Berlin crisis.

2.  The applicant states he was called to active duty with the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) during the Berlin crisis from 1 October 1961 to 11 August 1962. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* a Certificate of Appreciation from the Secretary of the Army 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 10 March 1958, he enlisted in the USAR.  He completed 6 months of active duty for training from 20 April to 19 October 1958.

3.  On 19 October 1958, he was assigned to the 450th Ordnance Company (Ammunition) in Aiken, SC.

4.  On 1 October 1961, he was ordered to active duty.

5.  Headquarters XII U.S. Army Corps, Atlanta 6, GA, Movement Order Number 13, dated 3 October 1961, ordered the 450th Ordnance Company (Ammunition) to proceed to the mobilization station at Fort Polk, LA to be assigned to Fourth U.S. Army to arrive on 13 October 1961. 

6.  There is no evidence the unit further deployed to Berlin.

7.  Section 5 - Service Outside Continental United States of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) does not show any foreign service.

8.  On 11 August 1962, he was released from active duty at Fort Polk, LA.  His DD Form 214 does not show:

* any foreign service in item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service)
* the award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal

9.  He provided a certificate of appreciation signed by the Secretary of the Army. This certificate extended the Secretary's appreciation to those who responded to the call and served in the Active Army during a time of crisis in 1961-62.  However, the certificate does not address individuals or units nor does it indicate that it is addressed to those who served overseas.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  

	a.  An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in, or be engaged in the direct support of, the operation for 30 consecutive or 
60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations.  

	b.  Table 2-2 lists designated U.S. Military Operations and the dates of eligibility for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  Berlin is listed among the operations and the dates of eligibility are from 14 August 1961 to 1 June 1963.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It directed that total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed be entered in Item 24c.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The certificate he provided does not provide any evidence to show he served in Berlin during the Berlin crisis.

2.  Although the 450th Ordnance Company (Ammunition) was ordered to active duty during the Berlin crisis, there is no evidence the unit was further deployed to Berlin.  His military records do not show he served in Berlin during the Berlin crisis.  There is no evidence of record and he has not provided any substantive evidence to show he served in Berlin during the Berlin crisis.  Therefore, there is an insufficient basis for granting relief in this case. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008713





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008713



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002899

    Original file (20070002899.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070002899 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant also requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the weapons qualification badges that he earned. The applicant's military records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002079

    Original file (20150002079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years in order to receive airborne training * after jump school he was sent to Fort Jackson, SC, to become an instructor on the techniques of the firing range where he did well and received several letters of commendation * in early 1960, he again requested overseas duty and was sent to the 24th Infantry Division in Germany in February 1960 * shortly after his arrival, he was sent on temporary duty to Vietnam to help the South...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085119C070212

    Original file (2003085119C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty during the period 15 October 1958 through 7 February 1962, and his expiration of service date was involuntarily extended under Public Law 87-117, on 1 August 1961, for the convenience of the Government, during the Berlin Crisis. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant was stationed at Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003724

    Original file (20110003724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the National Defense Service Medal and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. Evidence shows the applicant served on active duty in Germany at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000574C070205

    Original file (20060000574C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 30 November 1964. While the applicant was mobilized with his unit during the Berlin Crisis, the evidence of record shows that he was never deployed to the area of operation that qualified for award of the AFEM. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001935

    Original file (20090001935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and that it be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States) of the applicant's DA Form 24 shows that during the period he was ordered to active duty he had no overseas service. The evidence shows the applicant served on active duty for the period from 23 April 1959 through 12 April 1961 and for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014054

    Original file (20080014054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 24c of the DD Form 214 he was issued at that time shows he completed 1 year, 3 months, and 27 days of overseas service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (20 December 1955 - 19 December 1958). Item 24c of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 16 days of overseas service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (20 December 1958 - 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007051

    Original file (20100007051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The MAB stated: The 84th Engineer Battalion, though deployed to support efforts against potential hostile action coming from Berlin, did not serve in the geographical area of Berlin; therefore, service members assigned to that unit are not eligible to receive award of the AFEM. The website discussion board posting regarding an ABCMR decision on award of the AFEM for Berlin shows an applicant who...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018842

    Original file (20070018842.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his record to show this award. With respect to award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, evidence of record shows that the applicant completed his entire military service at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00552

    Original file (BC-2006-00552.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served 10 months and 20 days of total active duty service during the contested time period. The applicant was in the active Air Force for a period of 1 October 1961 to 20 August 1962, and was assigned to the 138th TFS, with a duty station at Phalsbourg Air Base, France. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record there is no indication in the applicant’s military personnel record that he is...