Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008540
Original file (20130008540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  23 January 2014
 
		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008540 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his training in    item 29.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not reflect his training in   item 29.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, dated 14 May 1961, and three training certificates dated in 1964. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the New Jersey Army National Guard (NJARNG) on 13 October 1960 for as period of 3 years.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 19 November 1960 and he completed basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey.  He was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky where he attended advanced individual training (AIT) as a parts clerk from 13 February to 13 May 1961. 

3.  On 14 May 1961, he was released from ACDUTRA and he was returned to his NJARNG unit.  He had served 5 months and 26 days of active service and the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of release contains the entry “NONE” in item 29 under Service Schools.

4.  The training certificates provided by the applicant show that he completed three aviation maintenance courses at Fort Rucker, Alabama during the period   9 October to 18 December 1964.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that military courses completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered on the DD Form 214.  It also provides that changes that occur subsequent to the period covered by the DD Form 214 will not be entered on that form retroactively. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant completed 8 weeks of AIT as a parts clerk at Fort Knox, Kentucky between 13 February and 13 May 1961 and he is entitled to have this course entered on his DD Form 214.

2.  However, the three courses he completed in 1964 are not authorized for entry on his DD Form 214, dated 14 May 1961, because the courses were not completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__x____  ____x____  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the entry “Ft Knox, KY 13 Feb - 13 May 1961 Parts Clerk” to item 29 of his DD Form 214, dated 14 May 1961.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding military training courses completed in 1964 to his DD Form 214.  




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008540



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008540



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002304

    Original file (20120002304.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The available evidence shows the applicant was a member of the New Jersey ARNG when he was ordered to ADT effective 17 January 1974. As a member of the New Jersey ARNG who was ordered to active duty for training only, the applicant is not eligible for the NDSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010325C070208

    Original file (20040010325C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    James B. Gunlicks | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Accordingly, he should have been awarded the NDSM at the time of his REFRAD on 27 February 1961 or on his discharge on 12 October 1964. Although the KDSM was not authorized until 2004, the applicant served in Korea from October 1958 to November 1959, which is after the initial eligibility date of 28 July 1954.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003802

    Original file (20090003802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows MOS 16H. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant completed armor school/training. In the absence of orders which show the applicant was awarded MOS 11E, the entry on the applicant's DA Form 20 which shows he attended AIT in MOS 11E from 14 November 1966 to 18 March 1967 (with no corroborating entry in item 27 of his DA Form 20 to show he completed this AIT) is insufficient as a basis for amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005926C070205

    Original file (20060005926C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 20 January 1959 through 19 January 1961. Accordingly, those badges should also be added to his records along with the awards of the NDSM and the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 20 January 1959 to 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015993

    Original file (20140015993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has raised questions concerning actions of the original Board which are considered new evidence requiring consideration by the Board. d. Accordingly, the Board denied the applicant's request due to insufficient documentary evidence to make a determination. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he completed 20 years of qualifying service in the NJARNG for a non-regular retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007346

    Original file (20140007346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 14 October 1961 to show: a. his active duty service from 15 October 1961 to 9 September 1962; and b. his service number as NG XX 204 XXX instead of NG XX 214 XXX. The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of REFRAD, retirement, or discharge. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014222

    Original file (20140014222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the NJARNG on 14 July 1959. Since there is no evidence showing he enlisted or served in the Regular Army, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant the requested relief. ___________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005220

    Original file (20090005220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 30 of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 22c of the applicant’s DD Form 214 the entry “USARPAC” and to item 30 the entry “RVN service from 21 October 1968 to 24 March 1969.” _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084250C070212

    Original file (2003084250C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board convened on 24 April 1957 and after hearing testimony from the applicant, whereas he stated that he wanted out of the Army, the board of officers found that he was unfit for further service and recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness. The applicant's commander submitted a recommendation to discharge him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064398C070421

    Original file (2001064398C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests correction of Item 16a (Primary Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B10R6" vice "MOS 11E10R6." EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: