Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008092
Original file (20130008092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:	    23 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008092 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an unspecified unit citation and meritorious service award (apparently he means the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM)) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).   

2.  The applicant states:

* his DD Form 214 is missing a unit citation for valor and a meritorious service award
* it was a clerical error

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 August 1989 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (military police). 

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows he was assigned to the 401st Military Police Company while serving in:

* Panama from 5 October 1989 to 12 January 1990
* Saudi Arabia from 28 September 1990 to 3 April 1991

4.  On 3 April 1992, he was honorably released from active duty for unsatisfactory performance.

5.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* Army Achievement Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) with three bronze service stars
* Kuwait Liberation Medal 
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar
  
6.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 22, dated 30 August 1991, show the 401st Military Police Company was cited for the Valorous Unit Award for the period 19 December 1989 to 3 January 1990.

7.  There are no orders for the MSM in the available records. 

8.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 does not show entitlement to the MSM.

9.  A DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 4 February 1993, amended his DD Form 214 by deleting the SWASM with three bronze service stars and adding the SWASM with two bronze service stars.

10.  A DD Form 215, dated 25 March 1993, amended his DD Form 214 by adding the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and his dates of service in Panama.




11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the MSM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who distinguish themselves by outstanding meritorious achievement or service in a noncombat area.  After 16 January 1969 but prior to 11 September 2001, the MSM was authorized to be awarded only for meritorious service or achievement while serving in a non-combat area.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Orders show the applicant's unit was cited for the Valorous Unit Award while he was assigned to it.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. 

2.  The applicant contends a meritorious service award is missing from his 
DD Form 214.  However, there are no orders for the MSM or any other personal decoration (except for the Army Achievement Medal now shown on his DD Form 214) in the available records.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base adding the MSM or any other personal decoration to his DD Form 214. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Valorous Unit Award to his DD Form 214.






2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding the MSM to his 
DD Form 214.  




      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008092





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008092



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088343C070403

    Original file (2003088343C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he was honorably discharged from the Marine Corps on 30 March 1981 while serving in the pay grade of E-5 as a food service specialist. A review of the available records failed to show the exact dates the applicant was deployed to Panama during "Operation Just Cause" with the 401 st MP Company. The applicant was assigned to a unit that deployed to Panama and he participated in "Operation Just Cause" during the period that qualifies for award of the AFEM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011443

    Original file (20090011443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, in two applications, that he desires correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and records to reflect: * His participation in Operations Nimrod Dancer and Just Cause * Credit for all days deployed * Credit or authorization to wear Department of Defense (DOD) and Army medals awarded during the period in question * Authorization to wear specific devices, insignia, or patches related to Operations Nimrod Dancer and Just...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013012

    Original file (20110013012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided three DA Forms 638, dated 18 May 2011, submitted by a civilian transportation broker for award of the: * DFC for valor during the period 12-17 January 1991 * AM with "V" Device during the period 18 January 1991 to 2 February 1991 * AM (2nd Award) during the period 8-12 October 1991 7. Qualifying service for this award includes participation in Panama in support of Operation Just Cause from 20 December 1989 through 31 January 1990. b. the DFC is awarded to any person...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009051

    Original file (20120009051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1992 correctly shows the number of AAMs he is entitled to. With respect to additional awards of the ARCOM, evidence of record shows orders awarded him two awards of the ARCOM and his DD Form 214 shows these awards. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * adding to additional awards of the AAM, ARCOM, and his appreciation and service certificates to his DD Form 214 * adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000957

    Original file (20150000957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant's service in support of: a. c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 28 July 1986 through 27 July 1989 (Standard Name Line: SPC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009397C070206

    Original file (20050009397C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders show he received the first award of the AAM for the period 9 January 1990 through 28 January 1990; the second award of the AAM for the period 15 July 1988 through 5 November 1991; and a third award of the AAM for the period 15 June 1988 through 15 December 1991. Although the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded ASI "Q9," there is no evidence of record which shows he completed the Traffic Accident Investigation Course. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015023

    Original file (20090015023.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his 30 April 1992 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service in Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, and Southwest Asia and all awards and decorations to which he may be entitled for these duty assignments. The applicant provides * DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records) dated 15 August 2009, 9 September 2009, and 11 September 2009 * Military Service Data documentation * DD Forms 214 for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022767

    Original file (20110022767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 did not list a marksmanship qualification badge. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 2011 to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 2011 the: * Meritorious Service Medal (2nd Award) * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013839

    Original file (20100013839.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), the Kuwait Liberation Medal (KLM), and an unspecified unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Army Achievement Medal (2nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013705

    Original file (20110013705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record shows the applicant was deployed with his unit to Saudi Arabia during the period 28 December 1990 to 1 May 1991. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the: * ARCOM * SWASM with three bronze service stars * VUA * KLM-SA * KLM-KU b. adding to item 18 of his DD Form 214 the...