Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008082
Original file (20130008082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	    9 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130008082 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 15 December 1995, to show:

* his training in and award of secondary military occupational specialty (SMOS) 96B (Intelligence Analyst)
* award of the Army Achievement Medal

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal after his discharge.  Additionally, his DD Form 214 does not show his SMOS and training in MOS 96B. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award)
* DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Texas Army National Guard on 3 July 1989.  He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 4 April 1990 and successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training. 

3.  On 29 June 190, Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Fort Jackson, SC, published Orders 127-410 awarding him primary MOS (PMOS) 71L, Administrative Specialist, upon completion of training. 

4.  He was released from ADT on 4 August 1990 to the control of his State ARNG.  His DD Form 214 shows in item 11 (Primary Specialty) the entry "71L1O Administrative Specialist."  

5.  On 9 July 1992, he attended and successfully completed Phase II of MOS 96B training at Camp Bullis, TX.  His DA Form 1059 shows he demonstrated the ability to perform in MOS 96B. 

6.  On 21 July 1992, the TXARNG published Orders 6-2 awarding him PMOS 96B and SMOS 71L effective 9 July 1992. 

7.  He was discharged from the TXARNG on 30 March 1993 in order to enlist in the U.S. Naval Reserve.  He was issued a National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) that captured his ARNG service and listed his PMOS and SMOS. 

8.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 May 1994 in the rank/grade of specialist/E-4, in MOS 71L and under the Station of Choice enlistment option.  He was assigned to Fort Hood, TX. 

9.  On 31 October 1995, his records were considered by a physical evaluation board that determined he was physically unfit and recommended his separation with entitlement to severance pay. 

10.  He was honorably discharged on 15 December 1995 by reason of disability. His DD Form 214 shows in:

* Item 11 - 71L1O Administrative Specialist, 1 year and 4 months
* Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Army Lapel Button, National Defense Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 
* Item 14 (Military Education) - None

11.  He provides a DA Form 638, dated 20 November 1995, that shows he was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal but the award approval authority downgraded this award to the Army Achievement Medal for service from 15 April 1994 to 21 December 1995 by Permanent Orders Number 25-3, issued by Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division, on 28 December 1995. 

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service.  

	a.  Item 11 of the regulation in effect at the time required an entry for the MOS codes, titles, years, and months for warrant officers and enlisted personnel.

	b.  Item 11 of the regulation currently in effect requires an entry for the titles of all MOS served for at least 1 year and include for each MOS the number of years and months served.  For time determination, 16 days or more count as a month (do not count basic training and AIT).  For an enlisted Soldier, also specify the first 5 characters of the primary MOS code (MOSC), which includes the 3 characters of the MOS, the fourth character of skill and grade level in the MOS, and the fifth character of a special qualification identifier (SQI), if applicable. Enter "O" when not applicable. 

	c.  Item 14 of the regulation in effect at the time required an entry for in–service training courses; title, number of weeks year successfully completed during this period of service; e.g., medical, dental, electronics, supply, administration, personnel, or heavy equipment operations.  This information is to assist the member after separation in job placement and counseling; therefore, training courses for combat skills will not be listed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  PO awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal, for service from April 1994 to December 1995, which is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 ending on 15 December 1995 to show this award. 

2.  He completed training for MOS 96B from 27 June 1992 to 9 July 1992.  This training was not completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (24 May 1994 to 15 December 1995) he now requests be corrected.  Therefore, this training cannot and should not be entered on this DD Form 214. 

3.  Although he enlisted in the Regular Army in MOS 71L and performed duties in that MOS, he was previously awarded MOS 96B, albeit in the ARNG.  However, he did not serve in this MOS for at least 1 year during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (24 May 1994 to 15 December 1995) he now requests be corrected.  Therefore, this MOS should not be entered on this DD Form 214. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  ___X____  __X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 December 1995 the Army Achievement Medal. 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding his award of and training in MOS 96B to items 11 and 14 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 December 1995 respectively.




      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008082





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130008082



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011516

    Original file (20110011516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in MOS 35M while on active duty, but his DD Form 214 shows he served as an 88M. Orders 301-408, issued by the TXARNG, dated 27 October 2008, ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) for a period not to exceed 400 days, effective 25 November 2008. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year and 27 days of net active service this period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020642

    Original file (20120020642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her proper military occupational specialty (MOS) codes, all of her military training, and a complete list of her awards. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows in: a. item 6 (MOS): * PMOS 72E1P, Telecommunications Control Operator, 3 October 1983 * SMOS 71L1O, Administrative Specialist, 8 August 1985 b. item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns): * Army Service Ribbon *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013409

    Original file (20100013409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214 does not show: * four awards of the Army Achievement Medal * her SMOS 71L * completion of Domestic Violence Intervention Training - Class 03-97 6. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from her DD Form 214 the Army Achievement Medal (3rd award), b. adding to item 13 of her DD Form 214 the Army Achievement Medal (4th award), and c. adding to item 14 of her DD Form 214 the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017179

    Original file (20080017179.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, his records do not show any derogatory information throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. With respect to the applicant’s MOS, the evidence of record shows that he was initially awarded PMOS 63B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074427C070403

    Original file (2002074427C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that she was entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Her DD Form 214 shows that she completed 4 months and 27 days of active military service and that she was awarded MOS 91A as her primary MOS. The available evidence supports that the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct in that it shows she served in the RA in an active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017949

    Original file (20140017949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending on 24 May 1991, to show in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – his rank as corporal (CPL) instead of specialist (SPC) * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – his secondary (S) military occupational specialty (MOS) of 95B (Military Police (MP)) 2. Therefore, the evidence of record is sufficient to warrant correction of item 4a of his 1991 DD Form 214 to show his rank as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022000

    Original file (20130022000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal. His DD Form 214 for this period also shows his rank/grade as SPC/E-4 and his effective date of pay grade as 31 January 1991. There is no evidence in the applicant's records and he provides none to show he was ever recommended for or held the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 or CPL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020345

    Original file (20120020345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record – Part I) * Memorandum, dated 23 February 2004, authorizing award of the Joint Meritorious Unit Award to the 541st Corps Support Battalion, Fort Riley, KS, with a list of names * List of units * Memorandum, dated 19 January 1996, listing Soldiers assigned to the 1st Maintenance Company, deployed to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba * Memorandum, dated 4 January 1996, Subject: Humanitarian Service Medal * Email, dated 23 May 2000,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006918

    Original file (20090006918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he performed nearly 20 months in military occupational specialty (MOS) 71L (Administration Specialist), award of the Army Commendation Medal, and a certificate of commendation. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 3 years of creditable active service. Notwithstanding the certificate provided by the applicant, in the absence of the orders announcing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017672

    Original file (20090017672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Army did not correct its records to show his PMOS was 11B4P. While the applicant received awards for his Infantry service in the Republic of Vietnam to include the CIB, the orders were issued awarding these individual decorations showing the applicant's MOS as 11B at the time of the award. The evidence of record does not support correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his PMOS was 11B4P at the time of separation.