IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 27 June 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130007793
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 2 to 23 February 2007.
2. The applicant states he was issued a DA Form 1059 for the military occupational specialty (MOS) 13M (Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS)) Advanced Leader Course with a marginal rating for the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) failure. In accordance with (IAW) All Army Activities (ALARACT) Message 075/007 this DA Form 1059 should have been corrected. He has attempted to contact the issuing proponent and was told there is nothing they could do to correct this issue.
3. The applicant provides copies of his DA Form 1059 and ALARACT Message 075-2007.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 17 January 1990. He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 8 November 1999.
3. He enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-4, on 9 November 1999. He completed training and was awarded MOS 13M.
4. His records contain and he provides a copy of a DA Form 1059 he was issued for the MLRS Section Chief Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course, 005-07, from 2 through 23 February 2007. This form shows the comment "Soldier met academic requirements, but failed to meet APFT standards IAW Army Regulation 350-1 [Army Training and Leader Development] during the course" in Item 11C.
5. ALARACT Message 075-2007, effective 1 April 2007, amended the Army's policy concerning the APFT and Height/Weight Standards applicable to institutional training. The message stated:
a. "Soldiers attending institutional training courses are still expected to meet the physical fitness standards and height/weight standards." The message also stated "Soldiers who fail to meet the Army Standards for both the APFT and Body Fat Composition will be considered an academic course graduate, but Item 11C of their DA Form 1059 will be marked "Marginally Achieved Course Standards" and Item 14 will be marked "Failed to Meet APFT Standards or Failed to Meet Body Fat Composition Standards."
b. "Soldiers enrolled in institutional training courses from 2 October 2006 to 31 March 2007 who failed the APFT retest will have their DA Form 1059 marked as having achieved course standards in accordance with the Army Weight Control Program which granted a six month period of no adverse personnel actions on Soldiers enrolled in schools.
c. There are no provisions in the message for deleting those statements from the DA Form 1059 of Soldiers who failed the AFPT or failed to meet body fat composition.
6. On 28 March 2012, he reenlisted for an indefinite period and is currently serving on active duty.
7. Army Regulation 350-1 prescribes the policies for developing, managing, and conducting Army training and leader development. Paragraph 3-12c states
Soldiers who fail to meet the APFT standards will be considered an academic course graduate, but Item 11C of their DA Form 1059 will be marked "Marginally Achievement Course Standard" and Item 14 will be marked "Failed to Meet APFT Standards." School commandants and commanders will complete a DA Form 1059 for all students in accordance with Army Regulation 623-3 (Evaluating Reporting System).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows the applicant attended the MLRS Section Chief BNCOC from 2 to 23 February 2007. He was issued a DA Form 1059 which showed he met academic requirements, but failed to meet APFT standards.
2. The applicant contends ALARACT Message 075-2007 provided for the correction of the comment regarding his APFT failure from his DA Form 1059. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence to show he met the APFT standards at the time. There are no provisions in the ALARACT Message for the removal of this comment from his DA Form 1059. In this case, this entry was properly annotated on his DA Form 1059 IAW Army regulations and policies. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction to his DA Form 1059.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130007793
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130007793
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020635
The applicant states he was told his DA Form 1059 was marked, "Marginally Achieved Course Standards" because he failed to meet height and weight standards according to Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program). Soldiers who failed to meet the body fat standards of Army Regulation 600-9 would be considered an academic course graduate, but item 11c of their DA Form 1059 would be marked "Marginally Achieved Course Standards" and item 14 would be marked "Failed to Meet Body Fat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007483
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 January 2007, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Accordingly, as required by the applicable regulation at the time, she was issued a DA Form 1059 that shows she marginally achieved course standards in that she met the academic requirements but failed to meet body fat standards IAW AR 600-9 during this course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005918
The applicant requests that the DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) dated 30 March 2007 be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File, and replaced with the corrected copy of the same form. The applicant states the DA Form 1059 currently contained in his interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) for the period ending on 30 March 2007 contains a marginal rating; however, a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010828
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150010828 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. A "marginally achieved course standards" DA Form 1059 documenting WLC states the applicant failed the height and weight standards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from his official military personnel file the "marginally achieved course standards" DA Form 1059 for the WLC and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018903
A comment on the form states she met academic requirements but failed to meet body fat composition standards during the course in accordance with Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program). The available records do not include a DA Form 5501 documenting the measurements that served as the basis for determining she did not meet height/weight standards while attending the SLC. Other than her own statements, there is no evidence of error in the determination that she did not meet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007472
The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) for the Basic Officer Leader Course (BOLC) (hereafter referred to as the contested AER) in item 11c (Performance Summary) "Marginally Achieved Course Standards" dated 24 January 2007, to either: a. Annotate the DA Form 1059 as a Satisfactory Achieved Course Standards and redact/remove the final line about the failed the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT); or b. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007257
The applicant requests correction of her DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) for the Warrior Leader Course (WLC) (hereafter referred to as the contested AER) to show in item 11d (Performance Summary) "Marginally Achieved Course Standards." In accordance with Army Regulation 350-1 (Army Training and Leader Development), paragraph 3-12g, Soldiers enrolled in institutional training courses from 10 August to 30 September 2006 who failed an Army Physical Fitness Test...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007257
The applicant requests correction of her DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) for the Warrior Leader Course (WLC) (hereafter referred to as the contested AER) to show in item 11d (Performance Summary) "Marginally Achieved Course Standards." In accordance with Army Regulation 350-1 (Army Training and Leader Development), paragraph 3-12g, Soldiers enrolled in institutional training courses from 10 August to 30 September 2006 who failed an Army Physical Fitness Test...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013608
The applicant requests item 11 (Performance Summary) of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 9 July 2008 through 18 December 2008 be corrected to show he achieved course standards; or, the DA Form 1059 in its entirety be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File). He provides a DA Form 3349 which shows he was issued a temporary profile for left meniscus tear on 24 December 2008. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013563