Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007780
Original file (20130007780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130007780 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his Vietnam service.  This request is considered to include the FSM's Vietnam service awards as a related issue.  

2.  The applicant states his Vietnam service needs to be included for authorization of benefits to her (the widow).  

3.  The applicant provides:

* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Notice Response
* VA Form 21-4142 (Authorization and Consent to Release Information to the Department of Veterans Affairs
* DA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim)
* Correspondence from the VA
* Self-authored chronology
* Certificate awarding the FSM the Army Commendation Medal and photograph of the medal
* Photograph of the of the Military Assistance Command Vietnam Patch

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army and executed an oath of office on 10 June 1950. 

3.  He entered active duty on 13 November 1950.  He served in a variety of stateside or overseas assignments and he attained the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC). 

4.  His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows he completed several tours of foreign service including:

* Germany - U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR)
* Japan - U.S. Army Forces, Far East (AFFE)
* Vietnam - U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)
* France - USAREUR
* Panama - U.S. Army South (USARSO)  

5.  He served in Vietnam from 22 November 1962 to 10 November 1963.  He was assigned to the Military Assistance Command Vietnam as a signal officer.  

6.  He retired on 31 July 1971 and he was placed on the Retired List in his retired rank of LTC on 1 August 1971.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - he completed 13 years of foreign service
* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Army of Occupation Medal (Germany), National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award), Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and Army Commendation Medal
* Item 30 (Remarks) contains entries related to his Blood Group and Grade

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contained the following guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214:

* item 22c showed the total active duty service outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed, e.g., "USARPAC"
* item 24 showed a member's awards and decorations
* item 30 was used for mandatory requirements, when a separate block was not available, and as a continuation entry

8.  A review of the FSM's records - as a related item - shows his entitlement to additional awards which are not listed on his DD Form 214. 

9.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced   award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.

11.  Item 23 (Qualification in Arms) of the FSM's DA Form 66 shows he qualified sharpshooter with the M-14 Rifle.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The FSM completed several periods of foreign service, equating to 13 years, the last of which was in Panama.  Thus, USARSO became his last overseas command.  His DD Form 214 correctly credited him with 13 years of foreign service as required by the applicable regulation at the time but omitted the major overseas command.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to add the entry USARSO in item 22c.  

2.  At the time of his retirement, the regulation provided for an entry in item 22c of the total foreign service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214.  This was done in the FSM's case and it included his Vietnam service.  There is no error.  However, there would be no harm to the Army or the FSM/applicant if his Vietnam service is listed in item 30 of his DD Form 214.
3.  As a related issue, the applicant is authorized several awards due to his service in Vietnam.  DAGO awarded his unit in Vietnam the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation which is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.

4.  The FSM qualified sharpshooter with the M-14 Rifle in August 1955.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14). 

5.  The FSM served a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* adding to item 22c the entry "USARSO"
* adding to item 24 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device 
* adding to item 30 the statement "SERVICE IN VIETNAM FROM 22 November 1962 to 10 November 1963" 



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007780



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007780



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016229

    Original file (20100016229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in Vietnam. Paragraph 1-31c(11) states an award for previous marksmanship weapons qualification is revoked automatically whenever an individual, upon completion of firing a record course for which the previous award was made, has not attained the same qualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011799

    Original file (20090011799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 22c the entry "Foreign and/or Sea Service (USARPAC-RVN)"; b. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Armed Forces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005979

    Original file (20120005979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his service dates in the Republic of Vietnam should be 23 February 1967 through 5 March 1968 * the period shown on his DD Form 214 conflicts with his dates of service in Germany * he enlisted in October 1962, took an early discharge in December 1963, and reenlisted for 6 years * he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 23 February 1967 through 5 March 1968 * he should have left Vietnam in February 1968; however, his departure was delayed because of the Tet...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007674

    Original file (20100007674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was issued a second DD Form 214 for the enlistment period 30 April 1967 to 12 December 1969 that shows in item 22c his last overseas command was in USAREUR. During the timeframe the applicant served Army Regulation 635-5 provided that a Soldier would be issued a DD Form 214 for each enlistment period and item 22c would show the last overseas command in which a Soldier performed. A later revision of Army Regulation 635-5 directed that the inclusive date of service for duty in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020088

    Original file (20140020088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his service record should show his service in Vietnam. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the National Defense Service Medal; and c. Item 30 does not show he served in Vietnam; however, it shows he served in USAREUR from 28 July 1961 to 15 July 1964; USARPAC from 30 September 1965 to 1 September 1966; and USAREUR from 30 November 1967 to 26 November 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003087

    Original file (20110003087.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 and military record does not contain any evidence to show he ever served in Europe. It states that the following will be entered in the items indicated: a. item 22c include the total active duty service outside the continental limits for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023036

    Original file (20110023036.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. in item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 11 July 1966 to 4 July 1967; b. in item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the 736th Medical Detachment (Military Provincial Health Assistance Program) and attached to the U.S. Military Assistance Command Vietnam (MACV), U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC), from 16 July 1966 to 3 July 1967; and c. in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) he was authorized the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103

    Original file (20130002103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005058

    Original file (20080005058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Vietnam for over a year yet the theater where he performed his foreign service is not identified on his DD Form 214, and the awards he earned for his service in Vietnam are not listed on his DD Form 214. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014988

    Original file (20100014988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Based on item 41 of his DA Form 20, he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the National Defense Service Medal which are not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...