IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 9 September 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080005058
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that all the awards he should have received and his service in Vietnam be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
2. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show any of his overseas duty or the medals he should have received.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214; a copy of his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction); and a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army on 18 January 1968. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 76L (Film Library Specialist).
3. The applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle bar on 16 February 1968.
4. The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 160th Signal Group on 3 June 1968. He was reassigned to the 221st Signal Company on 15 August 1968. He departed Vietnam on 12 August 1969 after being credited with participation in five campaigns.
5. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 14 August 1969, in the rank and grade of Specialist Four, E-4, after completing 1 year, 6 months, and 27 days of creditable active service with no lost time.
6. The applicants DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal. Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) shows he served 1 year, 2 months, and 14 days of foreign service. No theater of service is listed.
7. The applicants records contain no derogatory information. His DA Form 20 shows his conduct and efficiency were rated as excellent throughout his service.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation. Authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate campaign or service medal, including the Vietnam Service Medal. One silver service star is worn in lieu of five bronze service stars.
11. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldiers conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as excellent for the entire period of qualifying service.
12. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 221st Signal Company, it was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 July 1969 through 31 March 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1971.
13. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U. S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U. S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.
14. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. The regulation in effect at the time stated in pertinent part that the total active duty outside the continental limits of the Untied States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater (e.g., USAREUR (for U. S. Army Europe)) in which the service was performed would be entered in item 22c
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Vietnam for over a year yet the theater where he performed his foreign service is not identified on his DD Form 214, and the awards he earned for his service in Vietnam are not listed on his DD Form 214.
2. Item 22c of the applicants DD Form 214 should be amended to add USARPAC (i.e., the U. S. Army Pacific theater).
3. The Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with device (1960) should be added to the applicants DD Form 214.
4. The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period of time that unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation. Later, all units assigned to Vietnam were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. These unit awards should be added to his DD Form 214.
5. The applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle bar. This badge should be added to his DD Form 214.
6. The applicant completed over 18 months of creditable active service with no lost time. His records contain no derogatory information and his conduct and efficiency were rated as excellent throughout his service. It appears he met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
BOARD VOTE:
___xx___ __xx____ ____xx__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to add USARPAC;
b. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 18 January 1968 through 14 August 1969; and
c. adding the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with device
(1960), the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle bar to his DD Form 214.
_______ xxxx_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080005058
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080005058
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004399
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam for 11 months and 22 days but the theater where he performed his foreign service is not identified on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to add "USARPAC"; and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011881
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant's third tour in the Republic of Vietnam is not properly documented on his separation DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 1971; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001812
His DD Form 214 shows in: a. The evidence of record shows the applicant did not complete a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 November 1967 through 24 December 1968; b. adding to item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry "USARPAC"; c....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002953
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. he served in the RVN from 5 September 1968 to 22 November 1970 (a period of 2 years, 3 months, and 18 days); b. he was assigned to the 40th Signal Battalion from 9 September 1968 through 22 November 1970; and c. his awards as the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Vietnam Service Medal * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Driver-Mechanic Badge * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015420
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following: a. separation as a specialist four (E-4); b. service in Vietnam from 24 October to 1968 through 17 December 1969 (1 year, 1 month, 24 days) with the 596th Signal Company; c. his recorded conduct and efficiency ratings are excellent; d. service during two campaign periods; and e. award of the National Defense Service Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000326
Item 30 of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 22c of his DD Form 214 the entry "0 11 29" and adding the entry "02 01 00 USARPAC" * adding to item 30 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Vietnam Service 8 January 1968 - 7 February 1970" * Adding to item 24 of his DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007434
The applicant states, in effect, that he served 2 years in Vietnam; however, his DD Form 214 reflects only 1 year and 6 days of foreign service in block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service). The applicants DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016134
The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 8 March 1968: * date of birth should be 25 September 1943 * no foreign service shown * no date of rank (DOR) for E-4 * add the Army Good Conduct Medal * add the Presidential Unit Citation (Army) while assigned to the 362nd Signal Company * add the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge for the M-16 * show the scroll on the Republic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003686
The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time credits him with completing 1 year, 7 months, and 4 days of total active service, including 1 year and 4 days of foreign service in an unspecified theater of operations. It stated that for: a. item 22c (Statement of Service Foreign and/or Sea Service) enter the total active service performed outside the continental limits of the U.S. for the period covered by the DD Form 214, and the last overseas theater service in which the service was performed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013720
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded the applicant the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...