Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007168
Original file (20130007168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130007168 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his Special Qualification Identifier (SQI) of "M" and that he retired in the rank of first sergeant (1SG).

2.  The applicant states that he was erroneously retired in the rank of master sergeant instead of 1SG.  He goes on to state that he served the Army and his country with pride and honor and should be retired as a 1SG. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, retirement orders, an enlisted evaluation report, a recommendation for award of SQI "M," an Army Achievement Medal Certificate and his Verification of Military Experience and Training.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 November 1972 for a period of 4 years, Ranger Training and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed his training and remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 7 April 1983.

3.  A review of his records shows that he served under the SQI of "P" for Parachutist, SQI "Y" for Pathfinder, SQI "V" for Ranger, SQI "G" for Ranger, SQI "X" for Drill Sergeant, and SQI "M" for 1SG.  

4.  His records show that he served as a first sergeant while in the grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 of an infantry company in Hawaii during the period 1 August 1987 to 2 May 1988 (9 months).  

5.  He was reassigned to another command in Hawaii on 3 May 1988 and was promoted to the pay grade of E-8 on 1 October 1989 in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B5V.

6.  On 28 February 1992, he submitted his application for voluntary retirement and indicated that his highest rank attained was that of a master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. 

7.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that on 30 November 1992 he was honorably retired in the rank of MSG/E-8 by reason of length of service.  He was transferred to the Retired List in the rank of MSG/E-8 effective 1 December 1992 and had served 20 years and 
7 days of active service.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides in paragraph 12-17 that noncommissioned officers holding the rank of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title of 1SG provided that the individual is serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG, possesses the SQI of "M" and the individual served as a 1SG in the grade of E-8.

9.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System) in effect at the time established a priority for SQIs.  It provided that only one SQI per MOS would be allowed based on an individual’s qualifications and present duty assignment.  The sequence of priority from highest to lowest for the applicant’s SQIs was V, Y, P, G, M, and X.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information as it exists on the date of release from active duty or discharge.  It also provides that for item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), enter the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect that he was retired in the rank of 1SG has been noted.  The applicant was separated in the rank of MSG, the rank he was serving at the time he was retired in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time.

2.  While the applicant did serve as a 1SG for 9 months and qualified for award of SQI "M," he served in that capacity in the grade of SFC/E-7 and thus was not entitled to be retired in the rank of 1SG.

3.  Additionally, he was promoted to MSG/E-8 in MOS 11B5V and that was his primary MOS at the time of his retirement.  Accordingly, it was properly recorded on his DD Form 214.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no error or injustice in his case and no basis to approve his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      __________X			___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007168





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007168



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019211

    Original file (20130019211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Soldier must be serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG. The applicant held the rank of MSG, not 1SG, on his last day of active duty. His DD Form 214 correctly reflects the rank and grade he held at the time of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007077

    Original file (20140007077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank of first sergeant (1SG). The Soldier must be serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 and Directorate of Human Resources, U.S. Army Garrison-Hawaii, Orders 307-0004 to show his retired list grade of rank as 1SG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010988

    Original file (20070010988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he further served as a tactical noncommissioned officer (NCO) for 21 months at the United States Military Academy (USMA) performing the duties of a 1SG. Additionally, the regulation states, in pertinent part that Item 4 “Grade, Rate, or Rank” of the DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation. In view of the above, there is insufficient evidence to change the applicant's grade based on the evidence available in his military personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018958

    Original file (20140018958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 June 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140018958 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides in paragraph 12-17 that noncommissioned officers holding the rank of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title of 1SG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016234

    Original file (20130016234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 12-17 (Grade Title on Retired List of Former First Sergeants), provides that an NCO, holding the grade of MSG at retirement and whose record shows successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List (emphasis added) in the grade title 1SG. The Soldier must be serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG. The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show he was retired in the rank of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018054

    Original file (20090018054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, Department of the Army Special Orders Number 60, dated 28 March 1969, released the applicant from active duty on 30 June 1969 and, on the date following, placed him on the retired list and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve (Retired Reserve) in the rank of MSG. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel, Personnel Separations), chapter 12, currently in effect, states that NCOs holding the rank of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020768

    Original file (20100020768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he should be retired as a 1SG because he served as a 1SG for nearly 3 years although, through no fault of his own, he did not attend the First Sergeant Course (FSC). I have never understood how the Army could retire a Soldier as a Master Sergeant that had three years of First Sergeant time, six months [of] Command Sergeant Major time, and also be a USASMA graduate. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009924

    Original file (20120009924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as first sergeant (1SG) vice master sergeant (MSG). The evidence of record shows the applicant completed the 5-week 1SG Course in April 1996 and he served in the rank and duty position of 1SG from November 1996 (the date he was promoted to E-8) through August 1997. However, he served as the NCOIC in the rank of MSG in two different units from September 1997 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007328

    Original file (20100007328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 August 1987 to show he retired as a first sergeant (1SG)/E-8. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to MSG with a date of rank of 20 July 1985. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 12 (Retirement for Length of Service), paragraph 12-17 (Grade title on retired list of former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010807

    Original file (20110010807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110010807 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he performed duties of 1SG, Company E, 3rd Engineer Battalion, from 26 March 1959 to 2 June 1961. Army Regulation 635-200, currently in effect, states NCO's holding the rank of MSG at retirement whose records show successful service as a 1SG will be placed on the Retired List in the...