Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018958
Original file (20140018958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018958 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to correct his 
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was retired as a first sergeant (1SG).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that when the Board previously considered his request, his official records did not contain a copy of his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) showing he completed the 1SG course.  However, he is providing the DA Form 1059 in question and requests that his DD Form 214 dated 18 May 2006 be corrected to show that he was retired as a 1SG instead of master sergeant (MSG).

3.  The applicant provides a three-page letter explaining his request and a copy of his DA Form 1059 showing that he completed the 1SG course in Germany on 15 November 1996.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20140003528 on 8 October 2014.

2.  The applicant was serving in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) in the pay grade of E-7 when he was ordered to active duty on 8 July 1996 in support of Operation Joint Endeavor.  He was transferred to Germany on 16 July 1996.

3.  He attended and completed the 1SG course in Germany during the period 4 through 15 November 1996.  He departed Germany on 3 March 1997 and was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 18 March 1997 and returned to his NCARNG unit.

4.  He was promoted to the rank of MSG/pay grade E-8 on 1 June 1998, and on 1 May 2001, he was laterally appointed to the rank of 1SG in military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B5M.  The applicant was again ordered to active duty on 15 August 2004 in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

5. On 28 August 2004, orders were published by Headquarters, 105th Engineer Group, NCARNG laterally appointing him to the rank of MSG and withdrawing his special skill identifier (SQI) of “M”, which denotes 1SG qualified.  There is no explanation as to why his SQI was withdrawn in the available records.

6.  On 18 May 2006, he was retired by reason of temporary disability in the rank of MSG and was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired list (TDRL).  On 17 March 2009, he was removed from the TDRL and was permanently retired in the rank of MSG in MOS 95B5O.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides in paragraph 12-17 that noncommissioned officers holding the rank of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title of 1SG provided that the individual is serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG, possesses the SQI of "M" (emphasis added), and the individual served as a 1SG in the grade of E-8. 

8.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System) in effect at the time established a priority for SQIs.  It provided that only one SQI per MOS would be allowed based on an individual’s qualifications and present duty assignment.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information as it exists on the date of release from active duty or discharge.  It also provides that for item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), enter the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his retirement in the rank of 1SG has been noted.  The applicant was separated in the rank of MSG, the rank he held at the time he was retired in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time.

2.  While the applicant did serve as a 1SG for 3 years and qualified for award of SQI "M," his SQI was withdrawn through publication of official orders for reasons that are not explained in the available records and thus he was not entitled to be retired in the rank of 1SG.

3.  The applicant’s contention that his SQI was withdrawn as a result of reprisal against him as a whistleblower has been noted; however, he has provided no evidence to support that contention. 

4.  Additionally, he was serving in MOS 95B5O, which was his primary MOS at the time of his retirement.  Accordingly, it was properly recorded on his DD Form 214.  It is also noted that had the applicant been eligible for retirement as a 1SG, only his retirement orders would be changed to reflect retirement as a 1SG.

5.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no error or injustice in this case and no basis to approve his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION









BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20140003528, dated 8 October 2014.

      ______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018958



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018958



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003528 (2)

    Original file (20140003528 (2).txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2004 he was laterally moved to the S-2 duty position as a MSG. These orders show he was permanently retired in the rank of MSG. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 12-17 (Grade Title on Retired List of Former First Sergeants), provides that a noncommissioned officer (NCO), holding the grade of MSG at retirement and whose record shows successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title 1SG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003528

    Original file (20140003528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2004 he was laterally moved to the S-2 duty position as a MSG. These orders show he was permanently retired in the rank of MSG. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 12-17 (Grade Title on Retired List of Former First Sergeants), provides that a noncommissioned officer (NCO), holding the grade of MSG at retirement and whose record shows successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title 1SG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003528

    Original file (20140003528 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 2004 he was laterally moved to the S-2 duty position as a MSG. These orders show he was permanently retired in the rank of MSG. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 12-17 (Grade Title on Retired List of Former First Sergeants), provides that a noncommissioned officer (NCO), holding the grade of MSG at retirement and whose record shows successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the Retired List in the grade title 1SG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018571

    Original file (20140018571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of first sergeant (1SG)/pay grade E-8; not master sergeant (MSG)/E-8 as indicated in his retirement orders. The applicant provides copies of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record, three certificates, military occupational specialty (MOS) orders, award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), retirement orders, DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004660C070205

    Original file (20060004660C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be placed on the Retired List in the rank of "First Sergeant" instead of the rank of "MSG" (Master Sergeant). He also states that Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12, paragraph 12-17, states if a Soldier's record shows successful service as first sergeant, retiring in grade of MSG, having possessed identifier "M", the Soldier will be placed on the Retired List in grade title (rank) of "First Sergeant." The applicant was serving in the rank of MSG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009924

    Original file (20120009924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as first sergeant (1SG) vice master sergeant (MSG). The evidence of record shows the applicant completed the 5-week 1SG Course in April 1996 and he served in the rank and duty position of 1SG from November 1996 (the date he was promoted to E-8) through August 1997. However, he served as the NCOIC in the rank of MSG in two different units from September 1997 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010531

    Original file (20070010531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his retired rank of master sergeant (MSG) be changed to first sergeant (1SG) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Additionally, the regulation states, in pertinent part, that Item 4 "Grade, Rate, or Rank" of the DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation. Evidence of record shows that the applicant’s grade, at the time of his separation, was MSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001199

    Original file (20120001199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests placement on the Retired List in the rank of first sergeant (1SG) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as 1SG instead of master sergeant (MSG). It states that Item 4a of the DD Form 214 will reflect the active duty rank the Soldier held at the time of his/her separation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000404

    Original file (20110000404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 12-17 states that NCO's holding the grade of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the retired list in the grade title 1SG. Upon retirement, a Soldier is issued two documents: a retirement order and a DD Form 214. a. The DD Form 214 shows the Soldier's rank and grade at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021257

    Original file (20120021257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 August 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021257 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel, Personnel Separations), chapter 12, states that noncommissioned officers holding the grade of MSG at retirement, whose records show successful service as a 1SG, will be placed on the retired list in the grade title 1SG. There is no evidence of record to show he was a 1SG after 1 May 2010 or on his date of retirement.