Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007158
Original file (20130007158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130007158 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct separation authority and separation code. 

2.  The applicant states he was discharged in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), not Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation).  He was not separated by reason of physical disability. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Notification of separation for hardship
* Separation orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 October 1986.  He was assigned to Fort Ord, CA.

3.  On 14 June 1988, he submitted a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) wherein he requested separation because of hardship in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6.  

4.  On 20 June 1988, the separation authority approved his request in accordance with chapter 6, Army Regulation 635-200. 

5.  On 23 June 1988, Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division, Fort Ord, CA, published Orders 122-328 ordering his release from active duty, not by reason of disability, effective 15 July 1988. 

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 July 1988.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* Item 25 (Narrative Reason for Separation) - Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 6-3b
* Item 26 (Separation Code) - MDA

7.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3, states Soldiers of the Active Army and the Reserve Components may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship.  The regulation provides that hardship exists when, in circumstances not involving death or disability of a member of a Soldier’s (or spouse’s) immediate family, separation from the Service will materially affect the care or support of the family by alleviating undue and genuine hardship.  Under this provision for hardship discharge, parenthood of married service women and sole parenthood are the two conditions under which separation may be granted.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty.  SPD code "MDA" was the correct code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of hardship. 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 with separation code MDA.  Although the separation code is correctly reflected on his DD Form 214 it appears the separation authority was inadvertently listed as Army Regulation 635-40 vice 635-200.  The applicant should be entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct separation authority. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 25 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Army Regulation 635-40" and adding the entry "Army Regulation 635-200." 




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007158





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130007158



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012850

    Original file (20130012850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum, undated, contained in the applicant's military personnel file, shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge due to the premature birth of her daughter. It states that the SPD code MDG is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(1), by reason of parenthood. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated due to hardship, but the specific reason for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008044

    Original file (20090008044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from sole parent to hardship. It appears that at the time of the applicant's separation, separation code MDG was entered item 26 to assist the Army with statistical data on Soldiers separating from the service by reason of sole parenthood. However, this separation code and narrative reason prohibits the applicant from receiving the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061176C070421

    Original file (2001061176C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089016C070403

    Original file (2003089016C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 May 1994, the applicant submitted a request for a chapter 6, hardship discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was released from active duty on 3 June 1994 under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(2) and her service was characterized as honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002941

    Original file (20130002941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to change the narrative reason for her separation from "Pregnancy Discharge - Overseas Separation" to "Hardship." The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's separation were not available to the Board; however, the applicant's record contains Orders 118-6, issued by the 369th Personnel Service Company, dated 8 June 1988, which show she received an approved overseas separation and an approved chapter 8 (Separation of Enlisted Women for Pregnancy)...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001599

    Original file (AR20080001599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 19 March 2007, the intermediate commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 6, Paragraph 6-3b(2) for Sole Parent, with an honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000392

    Original file (20070000392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 14 June 2005 be changed to Hardship instead of Secretarial Authority. Evidence of record shows the applicant applied to the ADRB for a narrative reason for separation change to hardship/dependency and he provided substantive evidence to support his request. Since the evidence of record shows that he should have been discharged due to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014937

    Original file (20130014937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by adding the entry “Hardship Discharge” to the narrative reason for his separation. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013889

    Original file (20140013889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 November 1990, the applicant requested separation from the U.S. Army under paragraph 5-8, Army Regulation 635-200. On 14 December 1990, consistent with the recommendations of the applicant's chain of command, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for the inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood with an honorable characterization of service. Every case is individually decided based upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006511

    Original file (20080006511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 February 1997, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge, under the provisions of chapter 5 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of parenthood, inability to provide an adequate Family Care Plan and directed the applicant be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate. Paragraph 5-8 of Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, governed separation because of parenthood. Under this provision for hardship discharge, parenthood of married service members and sole...