Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005421
Original file (20130005421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  20 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130005421 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a Standard Form (SF) 312 (Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement) be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the official military personnel file).  

2.  He states he hasn't had any issues since he regained his security clearance over 10 years ago, and there is no need for the document to remain in his AMHRR.  He states, in effect, that since an incident that resulted in suspension of his security clearance he has served well in the Army.  He wants the SF 312 removed so it doesn't affect his military career. 

3.  He provides no documentation in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 6 April 2000, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 42A (Human Resources Specialist).  

2.  On 23 January 2002, he signed an SF 312, thereby agreeing to standard terms and obligations related to his access to classified information.  On 3 December 2002, he signed a second SF 312.  Neither form makes any reference to a suspension of his security clearance.

3.  His AMHRR is void of documentation of any incidents that may have resulted in suspension of his security clearance.
4.  On 31 May 2005, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist/E-4 and transferred to a Reserve component unit.  

5.  On 26 April 2006, he enlisted again in the Regular Army.  At the time of his application, he was serving in the rank/grade of staff sergeant/E-6.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resource Records Management) prescribes Army policy for the creation, utilization, administration, maintenance, and disposition of the AMHRR.  The version in effect on the dates the applicant signed the SF 312s in his AMHRR provided that SFs 312 would be filed in the AMHRR.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A thorough review of the applicant's AMHRR found no evidence of an incident resulting in suspension of his security clearance.  It appears he believes the presence of two SFs 312 in his record is evidence of an incident that isn't documented elsewhere in his AMHRR.  Even if one were to infer that his security clearance had been suspended, one would not be able to determine why it had been suspended.  

2.  At the time he completed the SFs 312, the governing regulation required they be filed in the AMHRR.  There is no evidence showing error, inequity, or injustice in the presence of these documents in his AMHRR.  In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.  

3.  In his application, the applicant describes an incident of what appears to be misconduct that is not documented in his AMHRR.  Normally, an Army Board for Correction of Military Records Record of Proceedings is filed in the applicant's AMHRR.  In this case, doing so would introduce information into his record that may do him harm.  Therefore, this Record of Proceedings should not be filed in his AMHRR.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x__  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board determined that information contained in this Record of Proceedings could potentially harm the individual concerned.  Therefore, this Record of Proceedings will not be filed in his AMHRR.



      _______ _x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005421





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130005421



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012953

    Original file (20130012953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) to remove the Standard Form (SF) 312 (Classified Information Non-Disclosure Statement) and the DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record-Part II). iPERMS, however, contains a variety of documents that are not authorized to be filed in a Soldier’s AMHRR, and these documents are filed in "Additional Folders."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015003C070206

    Original file (20050015003C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain a 27 August 2004 Memorandum for Record signed by the Commanding General of the Joint Task Force-Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. In addition, it states that the Soldier will be informed of the right to counsel, to demand trial by court-martial, to fully present his/her case in the presence of the imposing commander, to call witnesses, to present evidence, to request to be accompanied by a spokesperson, to an open hearing, and to examine available evidence. Evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007720

    Original file (20130007720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report (OER)) covering the rating period 15 February 2010 through 14 February 2011 (hereafter referred to as the contested OER) from her official military personnel file, now known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). d. Part VIIa (Senior Rater - Evaluate the Rated Officer's Promotion Potential to the Next Higher Grade), the senior rater placed an "X" in the "Do Not Promote" block and a second "X" in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003681

    Original file (20130003681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 5 April 2010, and all allied documents from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File. Counsel requests: a. correction of the applicant's AMHRR by directing the removal of the GOMOR, dated 5 April 2010, and all allied documents, including her rebuttal. e. A memorandum, dated 18 August 2011, from an attorney employed by the JAG Defense to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005940

    Original file (20080005940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, all records of non-judicial punishment (NJP) be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), all records related to the suspension of his security clearance be removed from the Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) and his Officer Record Brief (ORB), and reinstatement on active duty as an O-6. The evidence of record shows 32 CFR, Chapter 1, subsection 154.55c, states that whenever a determination is made to suspend a security clearance...

  • CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2005-030

    Original file (2005-030.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From June 8, 2000, to September 11, 2002, he was the air station’s Communications Officer and Command Security Officer (CSO), and as such was responsible for the security of the unit’s classified materials and head of the Communications Division, which consisted of himself and one petty officer. The applicant’s OER for the period, June 1, 2000, to May 31, 2001, shows that in addition to these collateral duties and his primary service as a first pilot and operations duty officer, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005016

    Original file (20090005016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be updated as follows: a. removal of the following documents from his OMPF: (1) DA Forms 5248-R (Report of Unfavorable Information for Security Determination), dated 17 and 22 October 2002; (2) DA Forms 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Actions (flag)), dated 12 December 2002 and 8 February 2003; and (3) General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 1 March 2004. b. reinstatement of his security...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005560

    Original file (20130005560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board's denial of his previous request that a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) be removed from his record or transferred to the restricted portion of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as Official Military Personnel File). A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's AMHRR only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. The available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001699

    Original file (20130001699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) (now known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR)) by: a. removing the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 7 January 2010, from his AMHRR; b. removing the Promotion Review Board (PRB) results, dated 31 May 2012, from his AMHRR; c. removing the Involuntary Separation Board (ISB) results, dated 19 June 2012, from his AMHRR; and d. reinstating him on the 2009 Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015001

    Original file (20130015001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel provides: * Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) Docket Number AR20130000855 * Denial of OER Appeal * Contested OER * HRC Notification of Separation Due to Non-Selection for Promotion * Denial of Request for USAR Service * GOMOR, Rebuttal Memorandum, and Filing Determination * Suspension of Security Clearance * ASAP Completion * Timeline of Events * Death Certificate * Hospital Record * Request for Compassionate Reassignment * Record of Expunged Arrest * 24...