Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004486
Original file (20130004486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  8 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004486 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states he served in combat in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11H (Heavy Anti-Armor Weapons Infantryman) in Operation Desert Storm.  He served and fought with Company E, 2nd Regiment, 7th Battalion, 24th Infantry Division.  The Combat Infantryman Badge is not listed on his DD Form 214 (Certificate or Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  He earned this award because he fought for his country and deserves to have it added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 1989 and held MOS 11H.  The highest rank/grade he attained was private/E-2.

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) does not list award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

4.  His records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge or any evidence that he participated in active ground combat.

5.  He was discharged under honorable conditions on 11 September 1991 in the rank/grade of private/E-1.  His DD Form 214 shows he served in Southwest Asia from 24 August 1990 to 12 April 1991.  The Combat Infantryman Badge is not listed.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Specific requirements state that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry or special forces specialty and must have satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger, or special forces unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's infantry MOS and service with an infantry unit are not in question. However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence to show he satisfactorily performed infantry duties or that he participated in active ground combat.  In the absence of documentary evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground combat with his infantry unit, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004486



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004486



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020234

    Original file (20090020234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. In the absence of evidence that he served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001870

    Original file (20090001870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the Vietnam era, the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The evidence of record shows that the applicant held an aviation maintenance MOS and was assigned to a support and/or transportation unit during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. In the absence of evidence that the applicant held an infantry MOS and actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002615

    Original file (20130002615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era, the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit any evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS and participated in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014826

    Original file (20080014826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, United States Army Infantry Center/OSUT, Fort Benning, Georgia, Orders 1-7, dated 2 January 1985, show the applicant was awarded MOS 11H effective 31 January 1985. United States Army Garrison, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, Orders 176-18, dated 9 September 1988, show the applicant was awarded primary MOS 96B2O and secondary MOS 11H2O effective 21 October 1988. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed OSUT and was awarded infantry MOS 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018194

    Original file (20130018194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His record does not contain orders awarding him the CIB. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021834

    Original file (20090021834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication in the applicant's records that he held an infantry MOS and/or was assigned to an infantry unit during his military service. The evidence of record shows he held an engineer MOS and was assigned to a supply and/or support unit during his service in Vietnam. In the absence of evidence that he held an infantry MOS and actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004124

    Original file (20090004124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the regulation provided that the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry personnel who were members of infantry platoons and squads in armored cavalry squadrons and regiments. For example, personnel possessing an infantry MOS in a rifle squad of a cavalry platoon of an armored cavalry troop would be eligible for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge if other criteria are also met." The applicant states he should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009693

    Original file (20080009693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1968 for a period of 3 years. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H. In the absence of evidence, which shows the applicant was awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004562

    Original file (20090004562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214, NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), and Permanent Orders Number 26-34, 1st Infantry Division, dated 19 April 1991, awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Permanent Orders Number 26-34, 1st Infantry Division, dated 19 April 1991,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008114

    Original file (20080008114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) he was assigned to a unit as an infantryman and performed the duties of an infantryman. There are no orders in his official record showing he was awarded the CIB. The evidence in the official record shows the applicant held MOS 94B and performed duties as a cook while in the RVN.