Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018194
Original file (20130018194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 17 June 2014 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130018194 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  He states he fought side by side with Soldiers in his unit who have the CIB on their DD Forms 214.  He states the CIB was pinned on him in Saudi Arabia.

3.  He provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 19 October 1988, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11M (Fighting Vehicle Infantryman).

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), reviewed on 7 October 1991, shows in:

* item 5 (Oversea Service) – he served in Saudi Arabia from 3 January to 18 May 1991
* item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) – no entry for the CIB
* item 35 (Record of Assignments) – from 16 June 1989 to 30 September 1991, he was assigned to Company D, 5th Battalion, 18th Infantry, in duty MOS 11M

4.  On 6 January 1992, he was honorably released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the CIB.  

5.  His record does not contain orders awarding him the CIB.

6.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 14, dated 11 April 1997, announced award of the Valorous Unit Award to the 5th Battalion, 18th Infantry, for extraordinary heroism while engaged in military operations during the period 5 January to 18 May 1991.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Award of the CIB is announced in orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence confirms the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit during his deployed service from 3 January to 18 May 1991; however, the evidence does not conclusively show that he participated in active ground combat.  His own statement is an insufficient basis for awarding the CIB.  In the absence of corroborating documentary evidence confirming he met the criteria for award of the CIB, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018194





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130018194



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057950C070420

    Original file (2001057950C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that an ARCOM he was awarded is missing from separation document and although he was recommended for the AGCM by his unit commander, he never received the award. It states, in pertinent part, that a member is entitled to receive the AGCM for each 3 years completed. It states, in pertinent part, that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056052C070420

    Original file (2001056052C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and must actively participate in such ground combat. In addition, although authorized subsequent to his separation, based on his service in Southwest Asia during Operation Desert Storm, the applicant is clearly entitled to both the KLM-SA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001100C070206

    Original file (20050001100C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 September 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001100 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be added to the list of awards contained on his separation document (DD Form 214). It was awarded to members who served in support of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001100C070206

    Original file (20050001100C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 September 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001100 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Chairperson Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughessy Member Mr. Patrick H. McGann Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019547

    Original file (20140019547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22, as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. Although the applicant contends that his unit was awarded the CIB after his discharge, the CIB is an individual award and not a unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068657C070402

    Original file (2002068657C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show that:The applicant entered active duty on 22 April 1986. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006998

    Original file (20100006998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier petition to add the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) to his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Further, the third-party statement provided from a Soldier who served with the applicant during Operation Desert Storm corroborates his participation in combat operations with the unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018378

    Original file (20110018378.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service) he performed duty in Saudi Arabia from 8 January through 9 May 1991; b. item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) no entry for the CIB; and c. item 35 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 41st Infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013103

    Original file (20080013103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was assigned as the First Sergeant of Company B, 5th Battalion, 16th Infantry, Fort Riley, KS, on 27 December 1988. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 February 1992 shows, among other awards, that he was awarded one award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002282C070206

    Original file (20050002282C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Kuwait Liberation Medal (KLM), awarded by the Government of Kuwait. There are no orders in the applicant’s personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence shows that the applicant was awarded the KLM.