Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002041
Original file (20110002041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110002041 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

The applicant defers to counsel.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests, on behalf of the applicant, two awards of the Purple Heart.

2.  Counsel states the applicant served in Vietnam during the period 1967 through 1968.  He should have been awarded the Purple Heart for shrapnel wounds below the left knee he received during an enemy mortar attack and a broken right ankle he sustained during an enemy ambush of his convoy by a large enemy force.

3.  Counsel provides:

* a self-authored letter
* three third-party statements
* page 4 of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 10-9009 (Agent Orange Registry Code Sheet)
* the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* a newspaper article about another former service member receiving the Purple Heart 60 years later
* copies of photographs taken in Vietnam, one of which shows an individual with a cast on the right leg

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States at Fort Brooke, Puerto Rico on 17 January 1967.  He was transferred to Fort Jackson, SC where he underwent his basic combat and advanced individual training as a radio operator before being transferred to Vietnam on 10 July 1967.

3.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 27th Engineer Battalion for his entire tour in Vietnam.  He was advanced to the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 4 April 1968.

4.  He departed Vietnam on 7 August 1968 and was transferred to Fort Lewis, WA where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 21 August 1968 as an overseas returnee.  He completed 1 year, 7 months, and 4 days of total active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD does not show any awards of the Purple Heart.

5.  A review of the applicant’s available personnel and medical record failed to show any indication that he was wounded or injured during his Vietnam service.

6.  Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not contain the applicant's name.

7.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.


8.  The statements provided by the applicant contend he was wounded as a result of a mortar attack.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was wounded in Vietnam and he should have been awarded the Purple Heart is not in doubt, he failed to show sufficient evidence through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was, in fact, wounded/injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment for his wound was made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted; however, they are not sufficient to overcome the absence of corroborating evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment was made a matter of record.

3.  In the absence of evidence to show otherwise, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.  However, this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to this Nation during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ____X___  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002041



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110002041



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012493

    Original file (20130012493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002547

    Original file (20140002547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * a wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. Regrettably, in the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001556

    Original file (20150001556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated in his previous application: a. His records contain: a. He described these injuries as "superficial" and stated he believed the injuries may have been cause by shrapnel from the explosion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000074

    Original file (20120000074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states while serving in Vietnam, he came under mortar and rocket attack and was injured. The applicant provides: * a VA rating decision * a DA Form 8-274 (Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record), dated 22 March 1968 * a DA Form 8-274 (Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record), dated 26 June 1968 * a statement, dated 11 November 1968 for replacement of government issue items lost in a 27 September 1968 mortar and rocket attack CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015325

    Original file (20130015325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a letter, dated 10 August 2013. The applicant's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action. In the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008021

    Original file (20140008021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart for injuries he received in Vietnam. A letter from the Military Order of the Purple Heart, dated 23 July 2003, which states there was no evidence in his record that shows he was treated for a shrapnel wound to his right hand during his military service. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004887

    Original file (20110004887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The former fellow Soldier stated: * a rocket penetrated the bunker in the applicant's sleeping area * the applicant was not seriously injured in the attack * he assessed the applicant's injuries and determined he didn't need medical care beyond his own medical treatment and bandaging * he failed to complete a Field Medical Card for the applicant's injuries * he provided a copy of his own DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009496

    Original file (20110009496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 12 May 1969. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to award him a second Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 26 August 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 12 May 1969; b. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012019

    Original file (20130012019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional official documentary evidence to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional documentation that...