Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004053
Original file (20130004053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    31 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004053 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Valorous Unit Award.

2.  The applicant states he served in Vietnam from 30 December 1965 to 3 September 1966.  He served as a cannoneer and he was assigned to
Battery C, 2nd Battalion, 9th Artillery, 3rd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division.  He knows a few former Soldiers who were assigned to his unit and they were awarded the Valorous Unit Award.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and pages 2-4 of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 September 1964.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 13A (cannoneer).

3.  His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 30 December 1965 to 3 September 1966.

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) while serving in Vietnam he was assigned to Battery C, 2nd Battalion, 9th Artillery, from 30 December 1965 through 30 August 1966.

	c.  item 38 he departed Vietnam on 31 August 1966 en route to the U.S. Army Personnel Center, Oakland, CA for separation processing.

	d.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal 
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* one overseas service bar

4.  On 3 September 1966, he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee and he was transferred the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 26 days of total active service with no time lost.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* one overseas service bar

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 9th Artillery was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for the period 22 April through 20 August 1967 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1972.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Valorous Unit Award is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy of the United States while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict in which the United States is not a belligerent party for actions occurring on or after 3 August 1963.  The unit must have performed with marked distinction under difficult and hazardous conditions in accomplishing its mission so as to set it apart from and above other units participating in the same conflict.  The degree of heroism required is the same as that which would warrant award of the Silver Star to an individual.

7.  Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia) prescribes Department of the Army policy for proper wear and appearance of Army uniforms and insignia, as worn by officers and enlisted personnel of the active Army and the U.S. Army Reserve, as well as by former Soldiers.  It states:

	a.  Unit awards are authorized for permanent wear by an individual who was assigned and present for duty with the unit at any time during the period cited or who was attached to and present for duty with the unit for at least 30 consecutive days of the period cited.

	b.  An individual who was not present with a unit during the period cited for permanent wear of a unit award may be authorized temporary wear only for the duration of assignment to the unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows his unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award well after his departure from Vietnam.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004053



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004053



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003621

    Original file (20120003621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request the applicant provides the following documents: a. a letter from the applicant to a VFW MSO, undated, in which he states he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, but he never received his other awards, including the: * Purple Heart (3 awards) * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (2 awards) * Presidential Unit Citation * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun (M-60) Bar * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009872

    Original file (20130009872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge * ARCOM * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * BSM * PH * one overseas service bar 12. One overseas service bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007254

    Original file (20100007254.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 2 April 1968, to show award of two Bronze Star Medals (BSM's) and the Purple Heart (2nd Award). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the same form shows he was awarded the Purple Heart by the authority of GO Number 119, dated 5 July 1967. The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show award of two BSM's and the Purple Heart (2nd Award) was carefully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017874

    Original file (20110017874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show all of his authorized awards and decorations. The applicant provides, in support of his request, a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Air Medal award orders, and Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 17 and 22 (1968), 21 and 46 (1969), 36 and 37 (1970), and 32 (1973). As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080019238

    Original file (AR20080019238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these unit awards. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010772

    Original file (20140010772.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the CMB. During this period, he received campaign participation credit for three campaigns, he received two awards of the ARCOM (i.e., one for meritorious achievement and one for meritorious service), his unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award, and he was recognized by the brigade commander for his combat service in armed conflict against insurgent forces in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016561

    Original file (20130016561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show his Vietnam service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * Vietnam Service Medal with four...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004030

    Original file (20140004030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * One Overseas Service Bar 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004349

    Original file (20110004349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. However, his DD Form 214 only shows the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016222

    Original file (20110016222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). Therefore, since there is no evidence to show that the unit was awarded the PUC during the period he served with the unit, there is no basis to add the award of the PUC to his records as a permanent award. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.