Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016222
Original file (20110016222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 22 February 2011 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016222 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).  He also requests that the medal be replaced.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the PUC in Vietnam while assigned to the 7th Battalion, 13th Artillery and that he lost the medal but he still has the ribbon. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 
17 December 1965.  He completed basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and advanced individual training as a cannoneer at Fort Sill, Oklahoma.  He was transferred to Fort Irwin, California pending activation of the 7th Howitzer Battalion, 13th Artillery Regiment.

3.  The applicant was assigned on-the-job training (OJT) as a supply specialist and he was subsequently awarded the military occupational specialty of a supply specialist.

4.  On 8 October 1966, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit and he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 13 November 1966.  He departed Vietnam on 21 September 1966 and he was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 9 months, and 9 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Good Conduct Medal, and Vietnam Campaign Medal. 

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  It fails to show that the FSM's unit was awarded a PUC during his assignment to the unit or the PUC for Vietnam.  However, his unit was awarded the PUC for DEFENSE OF KOREA. 

6.  Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia) states unit awards are authorized for permanent wear by an individual who was assigned and present for duty with the unit at any time during the period cited or who was attached to and present for duty with the unit for at least 30 consecutive days of the period cited.  Individuals who were not present with a unit during the period cited for permanent wear of a unit award may be authorized temporary wear only for the duration of assignment to the unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he was awarded the PUC while in Vietnam has been noted and appears to lack merit.  The 13th Artillery Regiment was not awarded a PUC for its service in Vietnam.


2.  However, his unit was awarded the PUC for service in Korea and it is common practice that unit awards (ribbons only) be issued to members assigned to the unit to be worn while assigned to the unit only.  Once individuals leave the unit they are not allowed to continue to wear the unit award unless they served with the unit when it was earned.

3.  Therefore, since there is no evidence to show that the unit was awarded the PUC during the period he served with the unit, there is no basis to add the award of the PUC to his records as a permanent award.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016222



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016222



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018485

    Original file (20100018485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. The letter he provided from his company commander is considered to be an official document of record; however, it refers to the unit engaging in ground combat after the applicant's departure from the unit. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081194C070215

    Original file (2002081194C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be amended to add medals for his service in Korea, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the "ACM" (presumably the Army Commendation Medal), the Vietnam Campaign Medal with device 1960, the Vietnam Service Medal with one or two bronze service stars, the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), the Valorous Unit Award (VUA), the Vietnam of Gallantry Cross...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011639

    Original file (20110011639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the 101st Airborne Division was awarded the PUC during World War II and that it was passed on to him because he was in the unit. Evidence shows his unit was cited for award of the PUC from 2 June to 20 June 1966. ____________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005738

    Original file (20130005738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile actions on three separate occasions. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to base correcting his DD Form 214 to show two additional awards of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006442

    Original file (20070006442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 11 August 1966 through 9 August 1968 based on completion of a period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010283

    Original file (20130010283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. replacing the entry in item 9 of his DD Form 214 with "28 Nov 46"; b. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214; c. adding the following awards to item 24 of his DD Form 214: * VSM with three bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011892

    Original file (20090011892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. A Soldier may wear the unit award temporarily if the individual was not present with the unit during the period cited but was subsequently assigned to the unit. The evidence of record shows that the 13th Signal Battalion was awarded the PUC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001003

    Original file (20080001003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the unit listed in Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his 26 June 1968 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The DD Form 214 he was issued upon his REFRAD shows his last duty assignment was Battery A, 7th Battalion, 18th Artillery. The evidence of record also confirms that neither the applicant's unit in the RVN or his unit at Fort Benning were awarded the PUC during the periods of his assignments to these units.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005845

    Original file (20110005845.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * any Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Valorous Unit Award (VUA), or Meritorious Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004518C070206

    Original file (20050004518C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Special Forces Tab in the applicant's service personnel records. A DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 18 November 2004, amended the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 September 1968 to show the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Bronze Star Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit...