Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003560
Original file (20130003560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003560 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, revocation of his 4 February 2003 U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders and transfer to the Retired Reserve.

2.  The applicant states for some reason he never received his retirement orders and this is causing him problems in getting his retired identification (ID) card and taking care of other important issues such as health care.

3.  The applicant provides: 

* Congressional correspondence
* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty)
* Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated
1 May 2002
* Orders 310-031, issued by Headquarters, 98th Division, Rochester, NY, dated 6 November 2002
* Partially legible expired USAR ID card
* Orders D-02-305034, issued by the USAR Personnel Command, dated
4 February 2003
* Email exchange with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 

or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 25 December 1959.

3.  His record shows he enlisted in the USAR on 28 March 1979 and he held a communications military occupational specialty.  He served through multiple extensions or reenlistments in a variety of assignments and he attained the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.

4.  On 1 May 2002, the USAR Personnel Command (now called HRC), St. Louis, MO, issued him a 20-Year Letter.  This letter notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60.

5.  Orders 310-031, dated 6 November 2002, reassigned him from his troop program unit (TPU) to the USAR Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) - Reinforcement), effective 1 November 2002, a voluntary reassignment.

6.  Orders D-02-305034, dated 4 February 2003, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR effective the same date.

7.  The applicant's records do not show that he requested a transfer to the Retired Reserve.  Likewise, his records do not show he reenlisted in the USAR.

8.  Army Regulation 140-10 sets forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR Soldiers.  Chapter 7 of the regulation relates to the removal of Soldiers from an active status and states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the USAR through multiple reenlistments from
28 March 1979 to 4 February 2003.  There is insufficient evidence to show he

reenlisted (or was denied reenlistment) or requested a transfer to the Retired Reserve.  Accordingly, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

2.  There is no evidence in the available records and he provides none to show he requested a transfer to the Retired Reserve.

3.  The applicant was a senior noncommissioned officer.  He knew, or should have known, that a transfer to the Retired Reserve is not automatic and must be requested.  He did not do that.  He did not question his discharge status for nearly 10 years.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide substantiating evidence to show he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

5.  However, a memorandum, dated 29 October 1999 and issued by the Under Secretary of Defense, states former members of the Reserve Components who are eligible to receive retired pay at age 60 under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731, but who have terminated their Reserve status are entitled to receive benefits provided under Title 10, U.s. code, chapter 54.  ID cards reflecting the appropriate benefits have been available in Real-time Automated Personnel Identification System (RAPIDS) sites since December 1999.  Reservists with more than 20 years of qualifying service for retirement at age 60 and who have terminated their Reserve status must simply take their 20-year letter to an authorized military ID card facility in order to obtain an ID card.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003560



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003560



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015298

    Original file (20090015298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be retained in the USAR. The applicant's ARPC Form 249-E shows he did not attain 50 retirement points for 2 years after his transfer to the USAR. There is no evidence the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001870

    Original file (20080001870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080001870 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. However, by regulation, members of the Reserve Component (RC) who are eligible to receive retired pay at age 60 have the option to be removed from an active Reserve status by either being discharged or transferred to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023090

    Original file (20110023090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to void his 10 October 2004 discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from HRC which states the applicant's request should not be approved unless he can provide evidence to show he was led to believe he would be transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged as he requested. After reviewing his request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006804

    Original file (20140006804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his November 2009 U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders be revoked and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant provides: * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter) * Discharge Orders 09-300-00028, dated 27 October 2009 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Army Reserve Personnel Command Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007883C070205

    Original file (20060007883C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve- Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), Paragraph 2-1a indicates that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1) attained age 60; (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service; and, (3) served the last 8-years of his or her qualifying service as a Reserve Component (RC) Soldier. It would now be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021586

    Original file (20120021586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 1 June 2004 U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders be revoked and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Photograph of a military identification card * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter) * Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) * Orders D-06-419231...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006819

    Original file (20140006819.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be changed to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. At the time of his discharge he had 20 years of qualifying to receive retired pay upon application at age 60. There is also no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007207

    Original file (20100007207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military records to show that she was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) (Retired). The applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60; discharge orders; AHRC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points; orders assigning her to the USAR Control Group...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004966

    Original file (20130004966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 December 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130004966 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. After reviewing the applicant’s presentation and evidence of record, the board of officers recommended the applicant be separated. The applicant is requesting transfer to the Retired Reserve simply because he is concerned that he will lose entitlement to the benefits associated with having completed 20 or more years of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008542

    Original file (20060008542.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a non-regular retirement and that he be issued a 20-year letter. His discharge order from AR-PERCEN, St. Louis, shows reason as "Completed 20 or more Years Reserve Duty." In a 6 June 2006 letter from HRC-St. Louis, the applicant was informed that he was never issued a 20-year letter, only an order that incorrectly notified him that he had 20 years of service.