Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023090
Original file (20110023090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023090 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to void his 10 October 2004 discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

2.  The applicant states he retired from the New Jersey Army National Guard (NJARNG) on 1 May 1999 and was transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank of chief warrant officer three (CW3).  He states he requested to be transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) in hopes of finding a unit and being promoted, but neither of those happened.  He decided to resign from the IRR.  He states he unknowingly signed an unqualified resignation form letter provided by the USAR Personnel Command (now known as U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)) which he believed would transfer him to the Retired Reserve and allow him to receive his identification (ID) card and use the benefits he had earned.  He states he never intended to resign his "Retired Reserve status."  He requests assignment to the Retired Reserve so he can receive a retired ID card.

3.  The applicant provides two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); assignment orders to the Retired Reserve, dated 16 September 1969; unqualified resignation memorandum, dated 13 September 2004; National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); and eligibility for retired pay memorandum, dated 10 September 1997.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 13 November 1956.  He was serving in the NJARNG in the rank of CW3 when he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter), dated 10 September 1997, which notified him that he was eligible to receive non-Regular retired pay upon application at age 60.

3.  On 1 May 1999, he was honorably discharged from the NJARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve.

4.  On 5 June 2003, the applicant was transferred from the Retired Reserve to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) based on his request.

5.  On 24 August 2004, he was notified that he had been nonselected for promotion to the rank of chief warrant officer four (CW4).

6.  On 13 September 2004, the applicant submitted his request for unqualified resignation as a Reserve officer in the USAR.  He stated he was no longer interested in participating in any facet of the USAR.  He understood that if his resignation were accepted, he would be entitled to an honorable separation and would be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.  On 10 October 2004, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

7.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from HRC which states the applicant's request should not be approved unless he can provide evidence to show he was led to believe he would be transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged as he requested.

8.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment.  He responded that he did not know what an "unqualified resignation" was at the time of his request and he believed he was going to be returned to his former status in the Retired Reserve.  He further states he did not receive a separation briefing and thus was not advised that he would be losing benefits.  He believes the Army has a responsibility for ensuring that Soldiers are properly advised.

9.  A review of the Integrated Web Services portion of the applicant's official records shows the applicant was contacted in February 2004 regarding participating in Task Force Global Patriot.  The applicant declined and indicated he was not interested in any volunteer opportunities.  In September 2006, he contacted officials at HRC and indicated he had been given the wrong information regarding his unqualified resignation and desired to have his discharge voided and to be transferred to the Retired Reserve so he could use his benefits.

10.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Army Reserve – Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail, and transfer of USAR Soldiers.  Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of Soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve. 

11.  Army Regulation 135-175 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve – Separation of Officers) provides policy, criteria, and procedures for the separation of officers of the ARNG of the United States and the USAR.  Paragraph 1-9 states, in part, that an officer whose resignation has been accepted or whose discharge has been directed will be separated on the date specified in orders or as otherwise directed by Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA).  The date of separation, specified or directed, will not be changed without prior approval of HQDA, nor can separation orders be revoked subsequent to the specified or directed date of separation.

12.  Due to Departmental changes implemented in 1999, certain benefits, such as commissary and post exchange privileges, accrue to Reserve members with more than 20 years of qualifying service for retirement at age 60 and who have terminated their Reserve status.  Personnel in this category are required to present their 20-year letter to the nearest military ID card facility to obtain a benefits card.

13.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve – Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-Regular Service) implements statutory authorities governing the granting of retired pay to Soldiers and former Reserve Component Soldiers.  It states that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of application, but must have attained age 60, completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service, and served the requisite number of years of his or her qualifying service as a Reserve Component Soldier.  Soldiers who have received a 20-year letter may make application for retired pay 6 months prior to reaching age 60.

14.  Army Regulation 135-180 further states it is the responsibility of each qualified individual to submit his or her application for retired pay.  The DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits) is the only form on which application for this pay will be made.  Approximately 6 months prior to reaching age 60, eligible Soldiers assigned to the Retired Reserve will receive a DD Form 108 from HRC.  Individuals who do not hold a current military status may obtain a DD Form 108 from offices of State adjutants general, Reserve training centers, or from the Commander, HRC, ATTN:  AHRC-PDR-RCR, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Department 420, Fort Knox, KY  40122-5402.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's honorable discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

2.  The applicant's contentions have been noted; however, they are not supported by the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record.  Inasmuch as the applicant had previously requested transfer to the Retired Reserve from the NJARNG, it is reasonable to presume the applicant understood that in order to be transferred to the Retired Reserve, a voluntary request on his part was necessary.

3.  After reviewing his request for unqualified resignation, there is no doubt that the applicant understood that he would be discharged instead of being transferred to the Retired Reserve.  The language in his request leaves no doubt as to his intentions at the time.

4.  Although his discharge will have no effect on his right to apply for retired pay at age 60 or his entitlement to benefits, his failure to elect transfer to the Retired Reserve vice discharge has allowed him to not be subject to recall since his discharge in 2004.

5.  Inasmuch as the applicant is eligible for "gray area" benefits from a discharged status and his retired pay will not be jeopardized by his status, there appears to be no basis to void his duly-constituted discharge orders.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023090



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023090



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002118

    Original file (20150002118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from the USAR on 7 April 2006. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018132C070206

    Original file (20050018132C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the applicant's records show he did not complete the last 8 years of qualifying service while a member in an authorized Service, as specified in Title 10, USC, 12732. The evidence of record shows that at the time the applicant received orders transferring him to the USAR Control Group (Retired) he had completed 20 years of qualifying service and was 45 years old. However, the applicant's last 7 years of USAR service were non-qualifying.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021482

    Original file (20130021482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer to the Retired Reserve. c. An HRC letter, dated 12 July 2005, informing the applicant that he had been considered, but not selected, by the 12 April 2005 Army Reserve Components Selection Board. The applicant's separation processing documentation is not available for review; however, the 24 October 2013 HRC letter shows he signed a memorandum, dated 27 March 2006, for an unqualified resignation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018049

    Original file (20140018049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her retirement points and records to show she completed 20 qualifying years of service toward non-regular retirement. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Non-Regular Service) states in paragraph 2-1 that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have: (1) attained age 60, (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016406

    Original file (20140016406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. The applicant's record is void of orders or any evidence that shows his resignation was accepted and processed by AR-PERSCOM or that shows he was ever issued orders discharging him from the USAR Control Group. On 1 May 2014, the applicant submitted a request to HRC requesting his MRD be adjusted to account for his breaks in service from 19 January to 16 August 1993 and from 27 October 2003 to 2 November 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001675

    Original file (20140001675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records should be corrected to show he completed 1 year of qualifying service for retirement year ending (RYE) 4 May 2007, instead of 11 months and 22 days and a total of 282 creditable points. He requested to resign in his 28th year of commissioned service as his mandatory removal date (MRD) was approaching and he wanted to enlist in order to complete 20 years of service in the USAR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003575

    Original file (20070003575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070003575 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. At no time prior to his ETS had he ever received a briefing stating that his records would be subject to a promotion board during his IRR (civilian) status. His obligation to serve ended on 30 December 1997;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000274

    Original file (20120000274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 August 1998, the Director, Personnel Actions and Services, USAR Personnel Command, St. Louis, MO notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60 (20-Year Letter). He was transferred in the Retired Reserve in May 1999. Evidence also shows the only reason the applicant's Retired Reserve status changed was because he desired to pursue an active duty career in the USAF which would both help with their need for dental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104104C070208

    Original file (2004104104C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve in lieu of being discharged. An Under Secretary of Defense Memorandum, dated 29 October 1999, granted former members of the Reserve Components (RC), who are eligible to receive retired pay at age 60, the entitlement to receive those benefits authorized by chapter 54 of Title 10 of the United States Code, which are normally associated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069937C070402

    Original file (2002069937C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he served as an enlisted member of the Army National Guard in Pennsylvania and then New Jersey, from 24 April 1980 through 26 June 1987. The applicant was correctly discharged according to regulation and law for two-time nonselection for promotion to CPT and is not eligible to be reinstated in the Reserve as an officer beyond the correction date of 12 February 2001 above, although he may be eligible to enlist which can be determined by the...