Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003455
Original file (20130003455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 November 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003455 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his date of entry on his 28 February 1986 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to read 27 January 1984.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he should receive a DD Form 214 for each of his three enlistment periods between 26 May 1978 and 28 February 1986 with only the last one being shown as under other than honorable conditions.  The fact that he received an Honorable Discharge Certificate for the two earlier periods shows that an error was made in the date of entry on his 28 February 1986 DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, four Enlistment/ Reenlistment Contracts, two Honorable Discharge Certificates, nine Enlisted Evaluation Reports, a Letter of Appreciation, and three training certificates.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 17 September 1964 and served until 11 November 1969.  

3.  On 12 November 1969 he enlisted in the Regular Army with immediate reenlistments on 11 October 1974, 26 May 1978, 25 February 1981, and 16 February 1984.

4.  The applicant was issued a DD Form 214 at the end of his enlistments on 10 October 1974 and 25 May 1978.  

5.  The applicant was issued Honorable Discharge Certificates to reflect the end of his two periods of enlistment on 24 February 1981 and 26 January 1984.

6.  The applicant was discharged on 28 February 1986 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, under other than honorable conditions.  Item 18 (Remarks) of this DD Form 214 contains, in part, the entry, “Immediate reenlistments this period:  810225-840126; 840127-880126.”

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  A DD Form 214 will not be prepared for the enlisted Soldiers discharged for immediate reenlistment in the RA.  Prior to 1 October 1979, DD Forms 214 were issued when a Soldier was discharged for immediate reenlistment.  This practice was stopped effective 1 October 1979.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Effective 1 October 1979, the policy regarding the issue of a DD Form 214 changed.  After this date a DD Form 214 would be only be issued if there was a break in service.

2.  The applicant's service prior to that change was properly documented on separate DD Forms 214.  However, since the applicant did not have a break in service from 26 May 1978 through 28 February 1986, a separate DD Form for each reenlistment period is not authorized.  However, those two periods of honorable service are indicated on his last DD Form 214, in the Remarks section, with the entry indicate he reenlisted on 25 February 1981 and 27 January 1984.

3.  The fact that the applicant was issued Honorable Discharge Certificates at the time of his immediate reenlistments does not demonstrate an error in the preparation of the 28 February 1986 DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003455





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003455



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006112

    Original file (20130006112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 February 1984, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. Effective 1 October 1979, military personnel who were discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment were no longer issued a separate DD Form 214. Prior to 1 October 1979,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026797

    Original file (20100026797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of service from 1 February 1974 to 25 January 1976. He was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of service from 26 January 1976 to 26 October 1978. On 27 October 1978, he immediately reenlisted for a period of 3 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009836

    Original file (20090009836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty this period on 8 February 1977 and he was discharged on 20 June 1981 in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, and his service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. In 1986, the applicant submitted two DD Forms 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States) to the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009223

    Original file (20130009223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The regulation in effect at the time, stated to enter a list of enlistment periods for which a DD Form 214 was not issued when the enlisted member was discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment in the RA. Further, Item 18 of his DD Form 214 shows he had two reenlistments during the period covered by the form.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030243

    Original file (20100030243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not on file; however, his record contains a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 17 October 1986, under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), and issued an under other than honorable conditions discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009051

    Original file (20120009051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1992 correctly shows the number of AAMs he is entitled to. With respect to additional awards of the ARCOM, evidence of record shows orders awarded him two awards of the ARCOM and his DD Form 214 shows these awards. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * adding to additional awards of the AAM, ARCOM, and his appreciation and service certificates to his DD Form 214 * adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009373

    Original file (20080009373.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served on active duty continuously from 1 November 1979 through 10 June 1988 and his DD Form 214 did not accurately document this service. The DD Form 214 issued to him at that time shows he completed a total of 3 months and 13 days of active military service during this period. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 3 months and 13 days of active duty service from 10 August 1978 to 22 November 1978, as evidenced by his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001390

    Original file (20110001390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a statement, dated 1 April 2010, he states he had a prior period of honorable service from February 1976 to September 1978. He was issued a temporary physical profile for back pain on 21 September 1979. On 17 February 1984, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an under other than honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016294

    Original file (20130016294.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant has requested correction of item 11 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 October 1986 to show he held MOSC 17C3O. The applicant has also requested correction of item 12a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 October 1986 to show he entered active duty on 10 March 1977. His record contains a DD Form 214 covering the period 10 March 1977 to 13 July 1978.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014692

    Original file (20110014692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Prior to 1 October 1979, DD Forms 214 were issued when a Soldier was discharged for immediate reenlistment. He completed 2 years, 9 months, and 19 days of creditable active service and he should have been issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service.