Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003064
Original file (20130003064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    5 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003064 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the reentry (RE) code of 3 on her 
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). 

2.  The applicant states she believes the RE code of 3 is unjust.  She had personal issues with her husband at the time, but she is now divorced.  They fought, and the military police were called on various occasions because their fights got out of hand.  They lived on base and she was escorted to stay in the barracks on numerous occasions.  She believes at the time her husband was a big portion of the problem.  He had become a nuisance to her chain of command, making threats, making her job very difficult, and putting her job in jeopardy.  She was in individual counseling and anger management because her problems basically stemmed from her husband at that time.  She does not think her discharge needs to be changed because she agrees with the honorable characterization of service.  She just thinks the RE code of 3 is unjust.  She knows for a fact her chain of command did not like her husband.  He just caused too many problems.  She believes that had they separated a long time ago, she would have remained in the military to this very day and her situation would have greatly improved.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 2 May 2006, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA).

2.  The applicant's records show she completed her initial training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and Redstone Army Arsenal, Alabama.  She was subsequently assigned to the Republic of Korea where she performed duty as an ammunition specialist.  In December 2007, she was reassigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

3.  On 1 February 2008, the applicant was advanced to the rank of specialist, pay grade E-4.

4.  On or about 27 July 2009, the applicant was command referred to behavior health where she was diagnosed with intermittent explosive disorder.  On 
4 October 2010, she was reevaluated and re-diagnosed with the same disorder.  The applicant had been afforded time to rehabilitate but showed no progress and was unable to perform her duties.

5.  On 6 January 2011, the applicant's commander recommended that she be administratively separated pursuant to Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-17 for other designated physical or mental conditions, with an honorable characterization of service.

6.  On 10 February 2011, the appropriate separation authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicant be discharged from the U.S. Army with an honorable characterization of service.  She was not to be transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.

7.  On 6 April 2011, the applicant was accordingly discharged.  She was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JFV and an RE code of 3.  Her character of service was honorable.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 provides that specified commanders may approve separation under this paragraph on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability that potentially interfere with assignment to or performance of duty.

9.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of armed forces RE Codes including RA RE codes.  An RE code of 
3 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a waivable disqualification.  

10.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The SPD code of JFV was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, for a condition, not a disability.

11.  The SPD/RE Codes Cross-Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Duty and Reserve Component Soldiers.  It provides that SPD Code JFV requires a corresponding RE code of 3.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends her DD Form 214 should be corrected to change her RE code because she believes it is unjust.

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was separated from the military due to being diagnosed with an intermittent explosive disorder which prevented her from performing her military duties.

3.  The RE code of 3 established her enlistment/reenlistment ineligibility without a waiver.  The assigned RE code was correctly entered on her separation document in accordance with the governing regulations.

4.  There is no apparent basis for removal or waiver of the applicant’s disqualification that established the basis for the assigned RE code.  The applicant’s contention that the RE code is unjust has been considered.  However, she has not provided any evidence or a convincing argument to substantiate her contention.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003064



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003064



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012325

    Original file (20100012325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 April 2005, the applicant's commander recommended her separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17. Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. These individuals can best advise a former service member of the needs of the military at the time and are responsible for processing enlistment waivers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016478

    Original file (20090016478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 May 2009, the applicant acknowledged her commander's decision to discharge her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 5, section III, paragraph 5-17, other designated physical or mental conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-17 states, in pertinent part, that commanders who are special court-martial-convening authorities may approve separation under this paragraph on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011128

    Original file (20090011128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record contains six formal counseling statements issued between 31 October 2006 and 14 December 2006. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides the Army's enlisted personnel separation policy. The applicant's request to upgrade her RE code in order to reenter active duty was carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014326

    Original file (20090014326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she was separated due to a personality disorder. The psychiatrist further stated that the applicant was stable and did not need psychiatric medications. The applicant has provided opinions from a psychiatrist and psychologist stating that she never had a personality disorder.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013983

    Original file (20120013983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The immediate commander stated the applicant had been diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established RE code 3 as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers separated with SPD code JFV. He was assigned a corresponding RE code 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011294

    Original file (20140011294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her reentry eligibility (RE) code 3 to an RE-1 or a more favorable RE code so she may reenter the military. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established RE code 3 as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers separated with SPD code JFV. She was assigned a corresponding RE code 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004020

    Original file (20130004020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SPD code "JFV" is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of "physical condition, not a disability." Therefore, the applicant's assigned RE code of 3 is also correct. These individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant’s RE code.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007458

    Original file (20130007458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He successfully completed Basic Combat Training (BCT), and AIT and a 2-mile run was the only thing that kept him from being assigned to Fort Stewart, GA. d. He truly wants a chance to reenter military service. On 28 September 2008, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him under Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018630

    Original file (20140018630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The examiner and the reviewer, a clinical psychologist, agreed on a diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. The mental health evaluation dated 24 February 2012 relates that the applicant reported a diagnosis of anxiety and depression about 3 years ago when he was in the military. SPD code "JFV" is the correct code for RA Soldiers discharged service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012570

    Original file (20100012570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of her reentry eligibility (RE) code to an RE code of 1 so she can reenter the Army. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JFV is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of a condition, not a disability. Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on...