Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018630
Original file (20140018630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  18 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018630 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record by changing his reentry (RE) code of 3 to RE 1.

2.  The applicant states that shortly after he started basic training his mother had a heart attack.  He was worried about her health but when he asked to talk to someone about this he was discharged for having anxiety and depression.  Only when he tried to reenlist did he discover why he was discharged.  He sought out and was evaluated by two psychologists to prove that this diagnosis was wrong.

3.  The applicant provides his personal statement and copies of a DA Form 3822-R (Report of Mental Status Evaluation), dated 21 June 2007; a letter, dated 9 September 2010, from a clinical psychologist; and a mental health evaluation, dated 24 February 2012 from another clinical psychologist. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 May 2007 and did not complete initial entry training.

3.  A 21 June 2007 mental health evaluation shows the applicant complained of being sad, nervous heart palpitations, cold sweats, muscle tension, irritability, difficulty sleeping, and vague non-specific suicidal thoughts with no intent or plan.  The problems had not improved since entering the military and he complained of worsening symptoms of anxiety and depression.  He attributed his problems to poor adjustment to the military and wished to be discharged.  Mental health service counseling appointments had not helped.  The examiner and the reviewer, a clinical psychologist, agreed on a diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood.  There was no mention of his mother’s health being a significant issue.

4.  Separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17 was recommended.  No discharge package is located in the available records.

5.  His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of a condition–not a disability.  Item 26 (Separation Code) shows the entry "JFV" and item 27 (RE Code) shows the entry "3."  He had completed 2 months and 1 day of active duty service.

6.  The applicant submitted in support of his request:

	a.  A 9 September 2010 letter from a clinical psychologist who related that the applicant was depressed because his mother had a heart attack.  His drill sergeant suggested that the only way he could get a week off was to accept discharge.  He waited several years because he was told that was necessary.  The clinician found no diagnosable disorder.

	b.  The mental health evaluation dated 24 February 2012 relates that the applicant reported a diagnosis of anxiety and depression about 3 years ago when he was in the military.  His mother had a heart attack and the applicant was given a leave of absence due to mental health problems with the provision that he could return after 2 years.  The examiner stated that the applicant had, at some prior time, exhibited symptoms that warranted the reported diagnosis, but he did not currently meet the diagnostic criteria for an adjustment disorder.  The examiner deferred any other diagnosis.

7.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Table 3-1 includes a list of the RA RE codes.  A code of "3" applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is writable.  However, those individuals are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states the SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations that identify reasons for, and types of, separation from active duty.  SPD code "JFV" is the correct code for RA Soldiers discharged service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17.

9.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers.  This cross reference table in effect at the time of his discharge shows the SPD code of "JFV” has a corresponding RE code of 3.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) states: 

   a.  Paragraph 5-17 provides for the separation of Soldiers on the basis of other physical or mental conditions not amounting to disability that potentially interfere with assignment to or performances of duty.  Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, disorders manifesting disturbances of perception, thinking, emotional control or behavior sufficiently severe that the Soldier’s ability to effectively perform military duties is significantly impaired.

   b.  Paragraph 3–9 provides that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case.

11.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records), the regulation governing the Board’s operation, requires that the discharge process must be presumed to have been in accordance with applicable law and regulations unless the applicant can provide evidence to overcome that presumption.  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The discharge process must be presumed to have been conducted in accordance with regulations.

2.  The medical reports he submitted as evidence were reviewed; however, they do not suggest that the separation was erroneous or unjust.

3. The applicant was discharged, on 17 July 2007, before he finished training, for a condition-not a disability.  He was assigned an RE code of "3."

4.  The RE-code of "3," establishing his ineligibility for enlistment/ reenlistment without waiver, was correctly entered on his separation document in accordance with governing regulations.

5.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for programs or benefits.  The applicant is advised that although no change is being recommended to change his RE code, this does not mean that he is permanently disqualified (at least from the Army) from reentering military service.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  __X_  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018630



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018630



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2001-072

    Original file (2001-072.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also on January 31, 2001, the CO recommended to the Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC) that the applicant be honorably discharged for unsuitability, in accordance with Article 12.B.16., based on his diagnosed personality and adjustment disorders. of the Coast Guard Instruction for completing discharge forms states that a member’s DD 214 should show a separation code and reenlistment code “as shown in the SPD Handbook or as stated by [CGPC] in the message granting discharge authority.” The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013598

    Original file (20130013598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that his RE and SPD codes should be changed because he did not have Hypothyroidism when he entered military service and recent test results confirmed that he does not have Hypothyroidism. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant's separation action or SPD and RE codes are based on the medical condition of Hypothyroidism.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013983

    Original file (20120013983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The immediate commander stated the applicant had been diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood. The SPD/RE Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's separation established RE code 3 as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers separated with SPD code JFV. He was assigned a corresponding RE code 3.

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2005-134

    Original file (2005-134.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Coast Guard Instruction for completing discharge forms states that a member’s DD 214 should show a separation code and reenlistment code “as shown in the SPD Handbook or as stated by [CGPC] in the message granting discharge authority.” The narrative reason for separation on the DD 214 must be whatever is specified by CGPC. The applicant was diagnosed with an anxiety and adjustment disorder and his CO recommended his discharge pursuant to Article 12.B.12.a. In light of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020139

    Original file (20120020139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The examining psychologist found the applicant met the criteria for administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17 (Other Mental Disorders), and strongly recommended the applicant's expeditious separation. His record is void of any documentation, and he has not provided any documentation, that shows he suffered any physical or mental injuries or incidents during his period of service in Iraq. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003975

    Original file (20110003975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record contains (and counsel also provides) a DA Form 4856, dated 25 February 2010, which shows the applicant was counseled by his company commander to inform him that he had been diagnosed with "5-17a(9) 'other disorder' per Army Regulation 635-200 and Army Regulation 40-501." It stated that the SPD code of JFV was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, for "Condition, Not a Disability" when a...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2008-127

    Original file (2008-127.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, CGPC stated, the applicant was not diagnosed with a personality disorder, but with an adjustment disorder. of the Personnel Manual, and the separation code to JFV when the diagnosis of personality disorder was absent, uncertain, or not supported by inappropriate behavior.6 In this case, CGPC recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s DD 214 to show separation code JFV and Article 12.B.12. Accordingly, the applicant’s DD 214 should be corrected to show “Condition, Not a...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2011-075

    Original file (2011-075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On September 25, 2009, the Discharge Review Board (DRB) changed the applicant’s separation code from JNC to JFY (involuntary discharge due to adjustment disorder) and the narrative reason for his separation from “unacceptable conduct” to “adjustment disorder.” The applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder while in the Coast Guard. The Board corrected that applicant’s record to show Article 12.B.12.a.12 of the Personnel Manual as the separation authority, JFV as his separation...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2005-082

    Original file (2005-082.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Coast Guard Instruction for completing discharge forms states that a member’s DD 214 should show a separation code and reenlistment code “as shown in the SPD Handbook or as stated by [CGPC] in the message granting discharge authority.” The narrative reason for separation on the DD 214 must be whatever is specified by CGPC. The record indicates that the applicant was discharged due to a diagnosed adjustment disorder, not a personality disorder. Therefore, the Board agrees with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018523

    Original file (20110018523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, his diagnoses met the criteria for an administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental conditions. On 29 July 2010, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other physical and/or mental...