Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012267
Original file (20130012267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012267 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was discharged in the rank/grade of specialist fourth class (SP4)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3.

2.  The applicant states he did not realize it was wrong but attributes the error to the fact that his social security number was also wrong for a period of time.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on                  16 September 1966.

3.  Unit Order Number 14, issued by Company C, 43rd Engineer Battalion (Construction), dated 14 April 1967, appointed the applicant to the permanent grade of PFC/E-3 on 14 April 1967. 

4.  Unit Order Number 77, issued by Headquarters Company, 6th Convalescent Center, dated 18 November 1967, appointed the applicant to the temporary grade of SP4/E-4 on 18 November 1967.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee on 5 September 1968.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 20 days of active service.  It also shows in:

	a.  item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank), SP4 (temporary);
	b.  item 5b (Pay Grade), E-4;
	c.  item 6 (Date of Rank (DOR)), 18 November 1967; and
	d.  item 30 (Remarks), "Item 5a:  PFC (P) E-3 Appointed 14 April 1967."

6.  Letter Orders Number 08-1321520, issued by the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, dated           23 August 1972, show he was discharged from the USAR on 15 September  1972 in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed policies and procedures regarding separation documents.  It also established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It stated the purpose of a separation document was to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service at the time of separation from active duty.

	a.  Section III (Instructions for Preparation and Distribution of the Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) contained guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214.

	b.  It states that all available records would be used as a basis for preparation of the DD Form 214, including the Enlisted Qualification Record, Officer Qualification Record, and orders.  The instructions for:

		(1)  item 5a stated to enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary (e.g., SP4 (T));

   	(2)  item 5b stated to enter the pay grade;

   	(3)  item 6 stated to enter the DOR for the grade shown in item 5a; and

		(4)  item 30 stated the "Remarks" section would be used to complete entries too long for their respective items.  Specifically, if the grade shown in item 5 was not permanent, enter the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank; otherwise enter the date of appointment to the permanent grade.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed to the rank of PFC/E-3 (permanent) on 14 April 1967 and he was subsequently appointed to the rank of SP4/E-4 (temporary) on 18 November 1967.  The applicant's DD Form 214 properly shows his temporary rank, pay grade, DOR, and date of permanent appointment in items 5a, 5b, 6, and 30, respectively.

2.  The DD Form 214 provides the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service at the time of separation from active duty (emphasis added).  Therefore, there is no basis for correcting the rank shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  Letter Orders Number 08-1321520, dated 23 August 1972, serve as proof of the fact that he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 at the time of his discharge from the USAR.  His DD Form 214 also shows he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 at the time of his release from active duty.

4.  In light of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ___x ____  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012267





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012267



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001834

    Original file (20110001834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of the specific time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements, and are reflected as: a. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002778

    Original file (20120002778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Korea and that he was separated in grade E-5. However, his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Korea or that he was separated in the grade of E-5. Records show the applicant served in Korea for 1 year and 1 month, from 7 April 1967 through 6 May 1968, and that this service is recorded in item 22, block c of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013644

    Original file (20110013644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 13 February 1967 to on or about 24 June 1967. With respect to his rank, the evidence of record shows the applicant was permanently appointed to the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 on 21 December 1966. With respect to the Purple Heart, the applicant was evacuated to military medical facilities as a patient during his service in the Republic of Vietnam; however,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006770

    Original file (20130006770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The instructions show for: (1) item 5a, enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation; (2) item 5b, enter the pay grade; and (3) item 6, enter the DOR for the grade shown in item 5a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from his DD Form 214 the entry in: * item 5a and adding "SP4" * item 5b and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015217

    Original file (20140015217.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as that of SP5/E-5. He responded and provided a copy of SO Number 292 (his separation orders), issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Dix, on 19 October 1967 listing his rank as "SP5." Although his record is void of any orders promoting him to SP5/E-5 while on active duty, his DA Form 20 and a USAAC Form 368 shows that he was promoted to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 effective 25 September 1967...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011138

    Original file (20100011138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Evidence shows his last permanent appointment was to PFC/E-3, which is appropriately entered in item 30 of his DD Form 214. However, the permanent pay grade and date of appointment, if different from items 5a and 5b, will be entered in item 30, as correctly reflected on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000285

    Original file (20150000285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders indicate this promotion was temporary; however, his DA Form 20 shows this promotion was made permanent on 23 September 1969, under the authority of Army Regulation 600-200, paragraph 7-22a. An individual could not be promoted to SGT or staff sergeant if the promotion would cause a surplus of by-grade authorized NCO personnel in the unit to which the individual was assigned. There are no orders promoting him to the rank of SGT in his records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014160

    Original file (20090014160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document also shows the applicant's rank was SP4. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was REFRAD in the rank of SP4/E-4 with a DOR of 9 July 1972 because he held that rank when he was separated from active duty and also at the time he was discharged from the USAR. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the correct rank, grade, and DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006018

    Original file (20110006018.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 April 1969, the U.S. Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, OK, published Special Orders Number 94 ordering his separation from the Regular Army, effective 25 April 1969. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a cross-reference. However, on 19 March...