Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002877
Original file (20130002877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    5 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002877 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his date of induction as 
9 June 1968.

2.  The applicant states he was inducted into the Army of the United States on    9 June 1968, and not on 9 June 1969, as shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214
* Envelop mailed from the Republic of Vietnam (No date stamp shown)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows in Section IX (Disposition of Inductee by Armed Forces) that the applicant was inducted on 9 June 1969 and ordered to report to Fort Jackson, South Carolina, that same day.

3.  Special Orders Number 111, Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Knoxville, Tennessee, dated 9 June 1969, show the applicant was inducted on that day and ordered to report to Fort Jackson, South Carolina, no later 2400 hours that same day.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant reported to the Reception Station at Fort Jackson on 9 June 1969, and commenced basic combat training on 16 June 1969.  He subsequently served in the Republic of Vietnam in 1970 and was released from active duty on 14 December 1970.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted on 9 June 1969.  It also shows he was released from active duty on 14 December 1970.  He completed 
1 year, 6 months, and 6 days of creditable active duty service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as in effect at the time, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provided that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provided for recording the date of induction and effective date of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his date of induction as 9 June 1968.

2.  The evidence of record consistently shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 June 1969.  There is no documentary evidence showing that he had entered the service a year earlier.  His DD Form 214 shows this same date of induction.

3.  There is no evidence of an error or injustice in this case.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002877





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002877



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028316

    Original file (20100028316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the ARCOM and Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 and b. adding the Army Commendation Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008959

    Original file (20080008959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows he was discharged on 22 January 1971, under conditions other than honorable, in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, for the good of the Service, with Separation Program Number (SPN) “246,” and issued a DD Form 258A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060625C070421

    Original file (2001060625C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years on 11 July 1968. The applicant was wounded in Vietnam and is entitled to the PH. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) awarding him the PH and the GCMDL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020855

    Original file (20110020855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 20 December 1971 to show: * Two awards of the Purple Heart * Three awards of the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device * Two awards of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device 2. His DA Form 20 shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in Vietnam from 28 April 1969 to 1 April 1970 * item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), he was promoted to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021773

    Original file (20100021773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows he was in the custody of the law at the time he was inducted into the Army of United States. Paragraph 5-5b of the same regulation states that an individual claiming erroneous induction because of a procedural right as provided by the Military Selective Service Act of 1967 may submit a request for release from custody and control of the Army. The available evidence shows he was charged with a Selective Service violation on 15 June 1966, for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010026

    Original file (20140010026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his completion of the Methods of Instruction (MOI) course was omitted from his DD Form 214. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant has provided a certificate showing that he completed the MOI course in 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005355

    Original file (20090005355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 24 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000664C070208

    Original file (20040000664C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart he was awarded in Vietnam for injuries he received in combat on 21 September 1968 be added to his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, during his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084996C070212

    Original file (2003084996C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no entry in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations), of the DA Form 20, showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show these awards as authorized awards because they were awarded to his unit after he had been released from active duty. c. amending the applicant's DD Form 214, Block 24, to correct errors and to include other awards and to read as follows: Purple Heart; Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal; Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004622

    Original file (20090004622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 29 May 1968 through 28 April 1970. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the ARCOM...